• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Lets talk about antiquated/out of style reloading practices

I commend you for the effort you put into your reloading and not debasing me cause I do not do it.
heck, truth be told, you are probably smarter and definitely saner than me because of my chosen path. seems like insanity sometimes what br guys go through just shoot 5 rounds into a little bitty group!! have a great day and it was nice talking to you.:D
 
Just goes to show that these type targets are pure luck, otherwise it would happen more often. This is not meant to take anything away from the shooters that shot the records.

well here are the NBRSA records as of 2003. Most of the scores were pre 2000. While I agree there is always a bit of luck involved, in particular when environmental effects are concerned to me it seems as if the technology of today seems to have had little effect on the average shooters groups

http://www.benchrest.com/records.htm

No AMP annealers, no Autothrows, hydro presses, or Sartorius scales could have influenced those scores.

Now I am no world class shooter but in the four years since I got serious about the hobby I have improved and am getting a lot more .2's and .3 and am starting to get the rare .1 group. Almost all of the techniques and tools I reloaded with this morning were available 20 or more years ago. Only new tech I used is a electronic scale and that is more because of the time factor involved than because of any effect on my ammo quality. Just speaking for myself here but practice at the range seems has seemed to help me shrink my group sizes more than any reloading room technique or toy. Now my shooting gear has improved, but even that is pretty much the same as what was being used 20 years ago
 
Last edited:
Just goes to show that these type targets are pure luck, otherwise it would happen more often. This is not meant to take anything away from the shooters that shot the records.

No doubt they're statistical anomalies AND it took exceptional shooters to have the capability of doing it. Both things can be true. SRBR shooters are well aware of the randomness of a single small group, that's why match winners are based on aggregates.
 
Inside neck reaming?? I think the burnished finish inside the neck is ideal. I can’t see where a bunch of tool marks would be of any benefit.

After 40 years of tool making in one venue or another, I got reaming
down pretty good. Straight and smooth. Actually it's easier then doing
a chamber. Once you got your setup made....run with it. ;)
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,252
Messages
2,214,888
Members
79,496
Latest member
Bie
Back
Top