Is it still a good idea or has CNC machining changed that? Thanks, James
Al, I have been around matches for 60 years in various disciplines. I have heard many excuses for a bad shot, or a poorly shot match. I have yet to hear 1 person say I did bad because my rings were not lapped or not bedded. Nor seen anyone point to a spot of contact invoving those items and saying, "See there it is, that caused me to miss that shot because my rings weren't bedded." Improperly tightened, over or under, misaligned, yes but never because they did not lap or bed. Just like I never saw with my own eyes the need to check run out of every round loaded, I have never seen a reason to bed or lap. To me improper lapping might cause the need for bedding. Evidently it is not deemed a problem given the outstanding lifetime warranties given by optical companies.So on this we will disagree.Rings can be as precisely made as possible but if the receiver and/or bases are off, the ring/tube fit will still be poor.
I consider the receiver, bases and rings as a single system. When that entire system is right, any scope will perform much better.
For what it's worth. -Al
One of the things that I have commonly seen lapping rings is line contact of the lap at the start of lapping, What this translates to is the scope being bent as the cap is tightened. To me all of the fuss about lapping is a bunch of guys looking for an excuse to skip a step in scope mounting, because they are basically bolt it together and shoot it types. I prefer to listen to people who are top level smiths, like my friend Speedy Gonzales. IMO he knows a lot more about this than you do.Al, I have been around matches for 60 years in various disciplines. I have heard many excuses for a bad shot, or a poorly shot match. I have yet to hear 1 person say I did bad because my rings were not lapped or not bedded. Nor seen anyone point to a spot of contact invoving those items and saying, "See there it is, that caused me to miss that shot because my rings weren't bedded." Improperly tightened, over or under, misaligned, yes but never because they did not lap or bed. Just like I never saw with my own eyes the need to check run out of every round loaded, I have never seen a reason to bed or lap. To me improper lapping might cause the need for bedding. Evidently it is not deemed a problem given the outstanding lifetime warranties given by optical companies.So on this we will disagree.
Respectfully......following that line of thinking, what's your advice to those that win with lapped/bedded bases/rings?Al, I have been around matches for 60 years in various disciplines. I have heard many excuses for a bad shot, or a poorly shot match. I have yet to hear 1 person say I did bad because my rings were not lapped or not bedded. Nor seen anyone point to a spot of contact invoving those items and saying, "See there it is, that caused me to miss that shot because my rings weren't bedded." Improperly tightened, over or under, misaligned, yes but never because they did not lap or bed. Just like I never saw with my own eyes the need to check run out of every round loaded, I have never seen a reason to bed or lap. To me improper lapping might cause the need for bedding. Evidently it is not deemed a problem given the outstanding lifetime warranties given by optical companies.So on this we will disagree.
Most factory actions' tops are not straight, and their scope base mounting holes are not perfectly aligned front to back, or side to side. Think about it. If you have a one piece base and the fit is not perfect, when you tighten the base to the receiver it bends the base a little and even perfect rings that are clamped to it will be misaligned, which will stress the scope. (stress bad, no stress good) With two piece bases the chance of their being out of line with each other is increased because their mounting holes have clearance, which means that you would have to run a straightedge down their sides and tops to confirm that they were in line. Also, if you lap rings for one receiver base combo, and want to switch them to another, you should relap them after coloring the inside the insides so that you can see where the lap is cutting. Generally, factory instructions are not for advanced users. For example, no set of instructions that I have seen gets into the finer points of either mounting or adjusting a scope. I think that the instructions that you mentioned fall into that category.Nightforce instructions say to not lap rings.
I'll venture a guess that they don't trust their customers enough to lap a set of rings. Given some of the things I've seen people do I don't blame them.Nightforce instructions say to not lap rings, I’m not sure what’s up with that.
Yea right. (sarcasm) The only way that you know that rings are correct and aligned is to mount them, and run a charged lap through them for a few strokes. Then you know what you have. Anything else is just assuming. I have lapped a lot of rings. Have you?Bed the rail and use good rings. Lapping is old school.
Al, I will buy the extra confidence factor. Would they have won anyhow? Absolutely. Too those who,win, Congratulations. On the flip, I have won a fair amount of matches. Did those I beat with lapped rings waste their time?.....LOL, that was a joke. JeffRespectfully......following that line of thinking, what's your advice to those that win with lapped/bedded bases/rings?
-Did they waste their time?
-Would they have won anyway?
-Was the extra confidence in their equipment not a real factor?
