Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/documents/ddtc_getting_started.pdf
After reading the entire thread and (what appears to me to be) applicable areas of the DDTC including the above linked document I don't see how these regulations can be construed to include items NOT to be exported. I think that attempts to enforce them on recreational/sporting arms and such that are sold for domestic use would be shot down on legality issues although the financial burden to the plaintiff would be extreme.
I will post a response (assuming I get one) from the DDTC Response Team concerning the application of this rule set to articles intended for recreational/sporting use.
It comes from:
Title 22, Subchapter M, Section 122.2(a)
"Any person who engages in the United States in the business of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing defense articles...."
This is included in the document you reference under the first paragraph of Section I, "Registration"
"In accordance with the AECA, registration with the State Department (via DDTC) of all U.S. persons that manufacture or export defense articles..."
It's independent of whether you export or import. If you manufacture defense articles at all, you are required to register and pay the fee. The change is that this hasn't been enforced for gunsmithing activities in the past. Now it will be.
"Any person who engages in the United States in the business of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing defense articles...."
......
"In accordance with the AECA, registration with the State Department (via DDTC) of all U.S. persons that manufacture or export defense articles..."
It's independent of whether you export or import. If you manufacture defense articles at all, you are required to register and pay the fee.
I screwed up the reference. It should be 122.1(a). I agree, vote for whoever the Republican is. We know what the other side will do. This new interpretation will do nothing to make us safer and the current administration knows it. This is done purely out of spite.
NRA/ILA has issued a bulletin. I do not recall seeing their response/actions to the rule.Has anyone contacted the NRA? Can we fight this via the Congress?
Here you go, only takes a few minutes;Has anyone contacted the NRA? Can we fight this via the Congress?
SEE: http://bulletin.accurateshooter.com...mpose-itar-registration-burdens-on-gunsmiths/
As explained in our Daily Bulletin article dated 7/29/2016, this registration requirement does NOT require actual export or even intent to export. This is very clear from section 122.1 of ITAR:
§122.1 Registration requirements.
(a) Any person who engages in the United States in the business of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing defense articles, or furnishing defense services, is required to register with the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls under §122.2. For the purpose of this subchapter, engaging in such a business requires only one occasion of manufacturing or exporting or temporarily importing a defense article or furnishing a defense service. A manufacturer who does not engage in exporting must nevertheless register.
Here is the DDTC document you guys should read: https://www.pmddtc.state.gov/compliance/documents/ITARRegReqFirearmsManufacturers.pdf
Yes, this is kind of crazy. Why should the Dept. of State have ANY control over products that never leave US borders? I do believe this is being done to extend federal enforcement power over gunsmiths without going through Congress. As long as some agency run by political appointees can set the registration requirements and annual fees, with zero Congressional oversight, this is very dangerous. The next "Guidance" document from the DDTC could say "Fees increased to $25,000 per year".
Regulations don't get "voted on",, they just get imposed!So bare with me, now dose this take effect immediately? Or dose it still get voted on?
Not only is it in effect it dates back 5 years . Punishment can be 10 years and a million $ fine per each violation . LarrySo bare with me, now dose this take effect immediately? Or dose it still get voted on?
Nate they were required by law to have it 5 years ago . Or when it was put into law. Larryhttps://blog.princelaw.com/2016/07/25/ddtc-issues-guidance-on-itar-registration/
Gunsmiths who do any machine work will now have to register with The State Department and pay $2,250.00 that does nothing for them or their customers.
You can thank Obama and Hillary for this.
Nat Lambeth
Time started when the law was made 5 years ago. Any gun work that was done previously can be charged with both a fine and jail time for each job . And if you apply for the license it would make them aware of previous work. LarryAre they going to send out a form or are you suppose to contact (who)? How does this work to working on your own guns? How much time does a person have etc.
DG