Somebody is gonna be pissed they dropped one of these fancy cases under a bench. Only one there today. About .015 shorter than the 7mm-08 case on right side. What's the point?
Attachments
Last edited:
WOW! Put yer thinkin' caps on.Somebody is gonna be pissed they dropped one of these fancy cases under a bench. Only one there today. About .015 shorter than that right side case. What's the point?
Serious swipe on that case.
Nope, not the Simpsons Good Little Cartridge.7mm SGLC.
I must be old to remember this one!
I wasn't calling it a Simpson clone. The point is many have been down the 7mm-08 road and there's not much difference in performance between most of them.i just mentioned an early one.Nope, not the Simpsons Good Little Cartridge.
All the SGLC is, is a 7mm-08 improved with 40° shoulder.
You could say 7mm-08AI, but Ackley never did anything with the 7mm-08 cartridge.
And that same reasoning would apply to a 6.5, and thus the Creedmoor was born.WOW! Put yer thinkin' caps on.
First, weight for weight, a 7mm can get much higher BC's than a .30 cal. Meaning 180 VLD's, ELD-M's have higher BC's than the same 180 gr. weight bullet in .308. If you go with heavier bullets in a .308, you lose velocity.
Second, the reason it's shortened is because you need that extra little bit of room to seat super high BC bullets out farther where the ogive isn't down in the neck.
Third, the bullets need to be within a given OAL because if they aren't they won't fit current action lengths.
You and I could jump right to a long action, but can the military? No....they can't. They've built everything around one action length, 2.8".
Yes. But, those implementing the round didn't garner enough support in accessories. Meaning the 6mm and 6.5mm don't feed well from any known magazines. It may only be a follower, but try finding one. This cartridge supposedly has the same taper as the .308/7mm-08.And that same reasoning would apply to a 6.5, and thus the Creedmoor was born.
