Sure it could kill a deer at 200 yards, but the question is WHY? I dressed a buck last fall for a buddy, 3 hits with 208 AMaxs, subsonic out of a 300 BO, 35 to 40 yard shot. No expansion, no exits. The deer died, but .....
I agree. My experience with subsonic on hogs at 50 yards or so was not that encouraging.I
Sure it could kill a deer at 200 yards, but the question is WHY? I dressed a buck last fall for a buddy, 3 hits with 208 S-Maxs, subsonic out of a 300 BO, 35 to 40 yard shot. No expansion, no exits. The deer died, but .....
II my opinion, if you are going to be shooting past 50 yards, use a different rifle / load.
Same goes for "long range hunting" and the .338 Lapua newbies. They'll shoot factory ammo once a year and think it qualifies them for the title "Long Range Hunter".A problem with subsonic hunting is there are a lot of people who read about it on the Internet, watch TV and YouTube and say this is what I want to do. They have little hunting experience and don't practice at all ranges and conditions that may be encountered in the field. Just sight it in from the bench and go. And to compound the problem we can add night vision (hogs). Just because someone can afford it doesn't mean they know how to use it.
The people at Lehigh, and others on this board, subsonic hunting is what they do and they have practiced enough to hunt and know when not to. The only guy I have hunted with using subsonic had an assistant calling range.
So yes a 300 Blackout can hunt deer, in the hands of a person who is willing to make the commitment to doing it right.
M
A 338 Lapua and a few YouTube videos don't make you sniper. That could hurt a lot of feelingSame goes for "long range hunting" and the .338 Lapua newbies. They'll shoot factory ammo once a year and think it qualifies them for the title "Long Range Hunter".