So just to add clarity to my post when I said less than ideal I was referring to the .218” /.224” config and the potential to damage jackets I have shot this barrel configuration extensively with 88 hornadays and 90vld bergers in a Bartlien and a Brux without any issues at all. Both barrels performed very well
Barrel length is also a critical factor with respect to jacket failure issues. These issues [potentially] become more of a problem when the barrel length reaches ~30", give or take an inch or two. Barrels in the 24"-26" range (or less) don't seem to suffer the same potential for jacket failures, which is not surprising because it is largely driven by friction. I have never lost a bullet jacket in a 0.218"/0.224" bore/groove configuration that had a twist rate of 7.0. It was only when I went to a twist rate of 6.8 in the same bore/groove configuration that the problem surfaced. The evidence suggests that multiple factors including bore/groove configuration, barrel length, twist rate, and bullet velocity can all potentially contribute to jacket failure, and is likely to be a combination of two or more factors acting together until a critical jacket failure point has been reached. As long as the bullets aren't losing jackets; i.e. multiple factors together creating stresses that are too much for the bullet jacket, a 0.218"/0.224" bore can work just fine. As I mentioned, I shot 90 VLDs out of 0.218"/0.224" 7-twist barrels for years without a single jacket failure. Hopefully, your 0.218"/0/224" barrels won't ever give you any problems.
Something interesting occurred to me in just the last couple days regarding bore/groove configuration, jacket failures, and brass life/pressure. I have a couple new 0.219"/0.224", 6.7-twist barrels I have been testing with heavies. What I am seeing is that overall pressure seems to be lower at a given velocity with the 0.219" bore barrels. I have been able to run bullets at velocities in these 6.7 twist barrels that I know with certainty would have caused jacket failures from a 0.218" bore. So, the 0.219" bore barrels are doing what they are supposed to with respect to jacket failures. However, I have also observed that the peak pressure at a given velocity also seems to be lower in the 0.219" bore barrels. I believe that some of the charge weights I have been able to test at the high end in 0.219" bore barrels without any issues whatsoever would have almost certainly resulted in blown primers in my previous 0.218" bore barrels.
That begs the question, is peak pressure markedly lower in a 0.219" bore barrel? Certainly it would make sense that it should be. The bullet engravement force would undoubtedly be lower in a 0.219" versus 0.218" bore, thereby suggesting a lower start/initiation pressure, which would also translate to lower peak pressure. One of the issues I had in the past when running the 90 VLDs at ~2850 fps in 0.218" bore barrels was extremely poor brass life. The pressures predicted for those loads by QuickLoad were over SAAMI MAX for .223 Rem, so the poor brass life wasn't unexpected, just painful every time I had to buy a new case of Lapua .223 Rem brass. I suspect from my results with the 0.219" bore barrels that I could run the 90 VLDs at 2850 fps from a 0.219" bore barrel and achieve much better brass life, in addition to mitigating potential jacket failures. So it may well be that using the 0.219" bore has a beneficial effect on brass life as well as bullet jackets. In any event, as the remaining 0.218" barrels I own become worn out, they will eventually all be replaced with 0.219" bore barrels, but as they are all 7.0-twist and don't seem to cause any jacket failures, I will happily continue using them until they need to be replaced.