garandman
Bolt Gun Bodacious
@PigButtons ... I just bought a stoopit Canik 9mm just cuz it was $450.
Done that in a 2002, great fun and a great car. Standing pedals made heal and toe easy.I only regret selling 2 cars, a 1967 SS Nova, and a 1974 BMW 2002. The first was an all around good muscle car from daily driver to open road, and I won my share in a straight line too. The Beemer you could drive wide open and use every single horsepower regularly. Drive it like a sprint car on gravel roads, tail hung out, steering wheel at opposite lock, big stupid grin plastered on my face. With its totally neutral handling, I could do donuts on frost. Oddly enough, both were great snow cars.
I still have my first bride.
So many people listing the Mini-14. I've got a Mini-30 in the safe I've never fired that I inherited from my dad. It is from the 80's, so odds are against it being a sub 2" gun.
I was wondering when someone was going to mention these piles of garbage! People pay big money for these useless jam-o-matics on GB all of the time, They look cool and all but quite useless and do not feed reliably at all.In my young and foolish days I purchased a tech 9
If you wanted accuracy or reliability, you had better practice throwing it
if it is any consolation, I had a recent occasion to shoot one of these. I also grew up shooting a 20 ga single shot, but this one kicked like a mule. I only shot it 2-3 times as a function check and that was a big plenty.Dad was a part time insurance agent in a small town, back when agents earned sales points. Agents had a catalog to chose "prizes" from. He said he was getting the brother and I a new shotgun for helping mow and clean the church property, single 20 ga New England. That shotgun kicked like a mule for this 9 yo. After the first "practice session for pheasant season" I told Dad it wasn't worth the mowing and painting.
HmmmGlock 34. Long Slide version of the 9mm Glock 17. I bought it to compete in IDPA. I thought the longer sight radius and more weight forward would be an advantage for fast target transitions. Unfortunately, trigger was inconsistent and vague. Plus I hated the ergonomics of the grip (the Glock backstrap doesn't fit any known human hand), and the gun always pointed left when I'd bring it up in "start with eyes closed" dry-fire practice drills. I switched to a SIG P226 and my scores and match standings improved immediately. In fairness, that Glock 34 was VERY accurate. In slow fire I could have near-touching bullet holes at 10 yards. But I was glad to get rid of it. The SIG P226 was equally accurate, pointed better, had a much better trigger (in SA mode) and held its value better. I also much prefer the SIG magazines.
View attachment 1287223
No debate, I have heard this same thing many times. Although many have said that the scope funtioned properly after it's return from NF. I believe they just don't/didn't want to admit that the Comp had a problem. My understanding is that they were fixing them but not admitting a problem..I had 2 NightForce "Competition" models. Both broke, resulting in 6+ inch groups at 300 yards. This was with 2 full blown F-Open rifles. These were NOT the 2013 models>>>they were 2015 models. I sent them back with the targets from the Competition scopes and my "back-up" NightForce 12-42BR model, which is and has been flawless. It did not matter to NightForce, they sent them back as "Nothing wrong with them"! I took them to a retailer who sold used scopes and he knew of the problems with the NightForce Competiton models. But as long as I had the paperwork stating nothing was wrong with the scopes, he bought them from me. Needless to say, I won't deal with NightForce anymore>>>>I now use Kahles scopes exclusively.. I am not looking for a "debate" here>>>>just giving you exactly what transpired..