A patent must be defended in order to be valid. Regardless of how big or small the issue may be. So they have precedent (and lots of money) on their side.Pivot drains/drops have been around for a while. I don't know nothing about patent law, but what leg does VISTA have to stand on?
Precisely what they hope going in. Then the cease and desist order will come.30$ / per might be the cheap way to stay in business?
According to REX, he has several patent attorneys who have already offered to represent him for FREE. He has stated that Supertrickler is here to STAY and will not be going anywhere.Litigation cost on this type of lawsuit will likely easily exceed 50k.
Sadly true…Many years ago, I was involved in a lawsuit brought on to my firm from a large corporation. I always had thought that if you didn't do anything wrong - you had nothing to worry about. Wow, was I naive. Answering a lawsuit costs money. If one intends to go to court to be heard, they can kill you during the period of discovery, whereas your attorney must answer to all their requests (many thrown in that shouldn't have anything to do with the suit) - but still - you must answer. And you keep paying your attorney to answer their demands for information. In the end, your attorneys will say they recommend you settle, as there is always that "chance" of losing. They will bring that up right after telling you what the daily court costs are for a jury trial. Staggering. In such a case, Vista can then order your product to not be sold with those features - and request a crazy price to "make them whole" for the units thus sold to date. This is a very effective way for larger corporations with deeper pockets to punish other firms with smaller legal funds. In the end, you could be vindicated - but you have to look at the cost to get there. And it won't be cheap, I can tell you that. While there are laws to prevent companies from suing without merit (called malicious prosecution), it is very difficult to win such a case, should you seek a suit to prove that and recover. While that 50K might sound unreasonable (regardless of whether it is baseless), it may prove to be the lessor in cost. I think that idea another posed of negotiation with Vista would be the best scenario.
According to REX, he has several patent attorneys who have already offered to represent him for FREE. He has stated that Supertrickler is here to STAY and will not be going anywhere.
That may be good, depending on the quality of the free representation.According to REX, he has several patent attorneys who have already offered to represent him for FREE. He has stated that Supertrickler is here to STAY and will not be going anywhere.
As a friend who's business was sued for patent infringement said "My lawyers said I can win the suit but I'll go broke doing it!"Litigation cost on this type of lawsuit will likely easily exceed 50k.
Small companies have more difficulty pushing back during examination when prior art is dug up from the past in my experience with the patents I have been involved with. Seems like larger companies may be able to frequently get more favorable results on flimsy claims, possibly because they have teams of professionals working on it, vs a couple engineers and the filing lawyer that was hired pretty much hourly to handle the paperwork.Someone was taking a nap during a prior art search.