Glass bed, pillar bed or both?

[dragman]

Both, why leave anything to chance.

 

[tomswede]

Bingo! I have a Remington 40-XC that I shot back in the 1980's. I was in the habit of snugging the action into the stock whenever I shot. Unfortunately, the stock did compress. I realized that when the screw protruded far enough into the action that I couldn't close the bolt. Having pillars installed took care of that problems.

Could have ground the bolts down to solve that issue quickly.

 

[tomswede]

To get these advantages of the pillars that action and lower metal needs to test on them. Otherwise the support is indeterminate.
Given the choice I like to eliminate the problem and shoot my tube guns

 

[holstil]

My testing has shown if bed properly and torqued properly there will be no issues with regard to loosening. I prefer full contact with bedding only no pillars.

 

[corning]

Could have ground the bolts down to solve that issue quickly.

I did, but the stock kept compressing.

 

[holstil]

Ive never seen anybody pillar bed a stock without bedding as well. You want your action to have full contact- not sitting on 2 points.

Agree to a large extent. I like to tighten against the surface of the foot print of the action as opposed to two small pillars.

 

[fatelvis]

I wish someone would do a test, or study and the accuracy potential of a rifle that was pillar bedded only, bedded only, pillar and bedded, and with a factory bedding block. I’m not sure how they would do it, but I would be very interested in the results!
But you know what they say: you can wish in one hand..... lol