• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Freedom Benchrest allow 40lb metal Rear Rest?

There will be a change and if you saw what was being used you would think otherwise. All my life I restored classic muscle cars and sports cars and built and rebuilt engines. I dont want to slap a bunch of 25 to 40 pound plates with channel iron wrapped in tape and sluck them to a match.
 
There will be a change and if you saw what was being used you would think otherwise. All my life I restored classic muscle cars and sports cars and built and rebuilt engines. I dont want to slap a bunch of 25 to 40 pound plates with channel iron wrapped in tape and sluck them to a match.
please let us know the secret Dave, obviously you know something
 
There will be a change and if you saw what was being used you would think otherwise. All my life I restored classic muscle cars and sports cars and built and rebuilt engines. I dont want to slap a bunch of 25 to 40 pound plates with channel iron wrapped in tape and sluck them to a match.
Then dont slap on plates. Just because another guy is doing it doesnt mean you have to.
 
To get away from rear rests I want to use the front rest and current rules to make a point. I go to matches and see guys using hammers to drive the steel or carbide feet into the concrete or wood bench surfaces. It’s very common practice. Why do they do it? Obviously to eliminate horizontal movement of the rest. That is a mechanical process no different that driving a nail into a board. Under Freedom rules should this be legal? The way I read it, no. You have effectively increased the weight of the rest to several hundred pounds, maybe more.

From the Freedom website;

“The Front and Rear Rests may not be
mechanically attached to the bench, rifle or to the other rest.”

I’m not trying to stir the pot. I’m trying to show how rules get pushed to the maximum and the rules themselves need to be very specific and concise. Why not keep the old rules for LG and HG and come up with a true Unlimited class in Long Range Benchrest? Allow anything in that class to push the envelope while not pushing shooters out of the sport because they don’t have the means, time or desire to keep up with the new technology.

Just a thought.
Dave.
 
To get away from rear rests I want to use the front rest and current rules to make a point. I go to matches and see guys using hammers to drive the steel or carbide feet into the concrete or wood bench surfaces.
If a shooter did this at my club they would not only be ask to leave but they would be told to leave and never come back. This would be considered destroying club property and it’s not allowed.
 
Went over to the welding shop this morning and contacted the Tampa Zoo about hiring out a monkey. Looks like there have been other inquiries about renting out a monkey. Hmmmm
 
I myself love to see the inventions some people bring to the match to try to wring out that extra inch of accuracy. For myself due to the fact that I have a fulltime job with limited time to test and reload like to abide by the KISS system. It just makes it more enjoyable to me, especially when the stars align and end up shooting small groups and good scores. One thing I would love to see is someone make a superlight tac type aluminum chassis with integral 3''-4'' fore end and rear bag rider so it would be more of a bench rest chassis. I'm sure its been done but it needs to be brought to market.
 
thanks, just to clarify a bit more and a quick question... "Sand Bags are required for the Front or Rear Rest System and must fully support the front, sides and rear of the rifle while in the Rest system. Size and thickness of the sand bags are not limited."

So, the sand bags must support the rear of rifle while in the rest system...but the sand bags do not need to "contact" the rest/bag rider mounted to the buttstock. IF this is correct I am thinking to use very thin bags under and along the sides in a rail system with roller bearings...or maybe attach roller bearings to the bag rider and have those roll back and forth across and along teflon rails over a very thin layer of sand...might not be pretty but should be pretty slick. Being able to adjust for windage without creating a pinch point is probably the most important aspect to consider. Might be easier to just to use a mini coaxial set up like our front rest. Fun project!
Interesting note. They probably need to add….”and must contact the rifle”.
 
If a shooter did this at my club they would not only be ask to leave but they would be told to leave and never come back. This would be considered destroying club property and it’s not allowed.
I shoot at quite few ranges over the Season, and every one requires “Super feet” under the rest spikes to protect the bench tops.

Of course, that is Short Range.
 
I shoot at quite few ranges over the Season, and every one requires “Super feet” under the rest spikes to protect the bench tops.

Of course, that is Short Range.
It is the same at Landsend Benchrest Club (SRBR) in Whitewater, CO and Western Colorado Rifle and Silhouette Club (LRBR) also at the Jarvis Shooting Complex in Whitewater, CO.

Ya pound spikes into our benches, you'll be escorted to the door.
Superfeet are required.

CW
 
I myself love to see the inventions some people bring to the match to try to wring out that extra inch of accuracy. For myself due to the fact that I have a fulltime job with limited time to test and reload like to abide by the KISS system. It just makes it more enjoyable to me, especially when the stars align and end up shooting small groups and good scores. One thing I would love to see is someone make a superlight tac type aluminum chassis with integral 3''-4'' fore end and rear bag rider so it would be more of a bench rest chassis. I'm sure its been done but it needs to be brought to market.
The MDT Elite has been modified exactly like what you’re saying and works phenomenal. I think Curt Knitt set the “tac” gun record with a 1.3xx” 4 target agg. It is awesome and anything BUT lightweight.
 
Adding all that extra width and weight to the butt stock doesn’t guarantee a winning combination. Some with the least still finish near the top.

 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,252
Messages
2,214,396
Members
79,472
Latest member
edix
Back
Top