You may want to check POST #1 ?Are you shooting off a bipod or a front rest? That will determine what type bag you will need.
Edgewood are USA made too, call Ryan and he can hook you up!SEB makes good bags, but protector is USA made and first class.
Something like this would be a very good option for the OP‘s butt-hook stock.If you're using a traditional bipod like the Atlas shown in the image, I would suggest that a squeezable rear bag might be a better option than a sand-filled, "eared" rear bag. Typically, F-TR shooters using ski-/sled-type front bipods that have their own [front] elevation adjustment use eared rear bags. In contrast, those using a traditional, pre-loaded front bipod may benefit more from a squeazable rear bag to provide better elevation adjustment. I favor the the oversized rear bean bag listed below, but other size options are available.
![]()
Red Tac Gear Tactical Pillow
triadtactical.com
Bean Bags/Shooting Rests - Triad Tactical Inc
triadtactical.com
I think that’s a mini range cube. I like it also for that type stock with a bipod.https://www.brownells.com/gear/range-gear/shooting-rests/mini-range-cube-bag/?sku=100035576This is what I use with a bipod. $35 on Amazon.
That's the way to do it, trouble is that he's got one of those gap toothed stocks designed for PRS where the precision level is lower than that of benchrest or F Class. God only knows who designed that kind of stock but I have one that I'm going to try and create a solution that fills that damn gap. Got a deal on the stock but the time required to fix the design may end up costing more in the long run.I use a Protektor 13A rear bag w/slick side ears and 3/4" spacing between the ears on my Pro Varmint MTR. Repeatability is almost as good as with a one pc rest.
Bill
Ron I totally get what your saying about that stock design, but mostly I wanted to thank you for the chuckle I got from it.That's the way to do it, trouble is that he's got one of those gap toothed stocks designed for PRS where the precision level is lower than that of benchrest or F Class. God only knows who designed that kind of stock but I have one that I'm going to try and create a solution that fills that damn gap. Got a deal on the stock but the time required to fix the design may end up costing more in the long run.
AnytimeRon I totally get what your saying about that stock design, but mostly I wanted to thank you for the chuckle I got from it.
I use a Rock Jr. Front rest with a Geissele squeeze type bag kind of like you are referring to and very much prefer it to my eared leather bag. I have two squeeze bags with different amounts of material to accommodate the wide range of stocks and rifles I have to shoot.If you're using a traditional bipod like the Atlas shown in the image, I would suggest that a squeezable rear bag might be a better option than a sand-filled, "eared" rear bag. Typically, F-TR shooters using ski-/sled-type front bipods that have their own [front] elevation adjustment use eared rear bags. In contrast, those using a traditional, pre-loaded front bipod may benefit more from a squeazable rear bag to provide better elevation adjustment. I favor the the oversized rear bean bag listed below, but other size options are available.
![]()
Red Tac Gear Tactical Pillow
triadtactical.com
Bean Bags/Shooting Rests - Triad Tactical Inc
triadtactical.com