QuickLoad is a guide. I use it, as well. According to what changes you make in entering information, it changes the output. Using my cartridge length and barrel length, it is 60,321 psi at 32.5. That’s with the standard weighting factor.
Many well made rifles do not show traditional pressure signs ,other than velocity, until 70+++ psi.So your saying with that QL. with me running 33.4 gr. Varget with a 103 VT. I'm up over 75,000 psi? I don't understand these numbers, not saying there not right, but with my Dasher I can go up to like 34.1 before I get any pressure. So please explain how that QL. program can decipher from one rifle to another? No WAY
Joe Salt
Internal volume of case in grains of water, filled to the top of the neck.What kind of info do you need to put mine though Quick load? I'll gladly give you what I have.
Joe Salt
Who said anything about jamming bullets?Did you calculate start pressure? Mine is 10,535 psi with the bullet 0.010" of the lands. The default weight factor is 0.40, the 6 Dasher is 0.57 by my calculation. For 32.2 gns of Varget the pressure is 72,742 psi and 3013 ft/s in a 29" bbl. The max psi for the Dasher is listed at 65,000 psi.
The default start pressure for cup/core bullets is 3625 psi, add 7,200 psi for a jammed bullet, if jammed the total start pressure is 10,825 psi. Now subtract ~29 psi for every 0.001" off the lands. This is 290 psi and the total start pressure is 10,535 psi.
As you can see the max pressure for 32.2 of Varget is 72+ which is ~ 7,000 psi more than default of 65,000 psi.
What is your start pressure?
In QL every function relates back to velocity which accounts for all variables.
It is a starting point for calculationsWho said anything about jamming bullets?
You are ~80 000 psi using all my parameters for a 29" bbl.I'm going the same speed as you just at 3000 fps at 33.4 of Varget and just touching the lands. Water volume I done it once can't remember, just guess.
Joe Salt
So using the "stock" values, and only changing coal, powder, and powder charge, I am within 15-20fps, and way under pressure. Labradar and magnetospeed verified.It is a starting point for calculations
Looks like your chamber is too tight at the back end.
I’ve been getting the same velocities with both brands of brass. I do believe the work hardening of the base of the Lapua from fireforming loads leads us to believe the Alpha is running into higher pressure quicker. Using a fireforming load for its first firing changed my results as far as pressure signs in subsequent firings.
New Alpha weighed within 4 grains of fireformed and chamfered Lapua.
I loaded up some of my Lapua brass that had been fired in my chamber, cut by the same person and same reamer:
View attachment 1175993
Notice the scrapes near the head. I shot some of OPs brass and loads in my rifle and it ejected perfectly. I usually run the same load thereabouts, in both brands of brass, and it does pretty well. I’ve tested a node 1 grain higher that was also good, but I didn’t want to trash my brass that quickly.
Lapua, 3rd firing:
View attachment 1176006
Alpha straight out of the box with only a mandrel ran through the mouth. Same load:
View attachment 1176007
Do I trust the actual velocities of the Shotmarker? No. Do I trust the shots measured from the same Shotmarker at the same time with no change in setup to correlate? Absolutely. SD and ES has shrank significantly on 2nd and 3rd firings. I’ve repeated my results with a borrowed magnetospeed.
OP is waiting to hear back from the gunsmith today. I believe the winners were those that said a burr or tight spot in the chamber. The action and brass is solid.
Same barrel and twist, same reamer, same smith. The rear of the chamber needed to be polished, as that solved the issues.Is your reamer specs the exact same as OP? Also I wounder why Alpha doesn't make their 6 Dasher brass as an optional small flash hole?
Thanks for the info.Same barrel and twist, same reamer, same smith. The rear of the chamber needed to be polished, as that solved the issues.
I honestly don't believe that the different flash hole size matters that much in this case. I'm a nobody, though, so grain of salt and all.