jackieschmidt
Gold $$ Contributor
Randy Selby can be pretty obnoxious at times, but sometimes he does make sense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can’t stand himRandy Selby can be pretty obnoxious at times, but sometimes he does make sense.
What’s wrong with respecting his life long experience?Can’t stand him
That’s about 350 yards doable for us Creedmoor Boys!Randy Selby can be pretty obnoxious at times, but sometimes he does make sense.
Me either, painful to listen to and usually he is captain obvious.Can’t stand him
Not his experience, it’s how he speaks as though he is the authority and anyone who had other experiences are unreasonableWhat’s wrong with respecting his life long experience?
I probably spoke out of turn, I have watched very few videos of his work. Actually I probably envy and want to hear stories from men this age that got to hunt a lot of animals before it came so cost prohibitive.Not his experience, it’s how he speaks as though he is the authority and anyone who had other
Randy Selby can be pretty obnoxious at times, but sometimes he does make sense.
He once wrote about the 223wsm but when challenged on it admitted he had no real experience with this calibre. Enuff said.Nathan Foster in NZ is that expert and I urge you to explore his website fully to examine the vast experience gained as a guide and long range shooter.
He also has several books on rifle selection and long range game shooting and works closely with some of the big projectile manufacturers on their projectile terminal performance.
In frustration with a 7mm RUM he developed the 7mm Practical that performs very nearly as well but doesn't suffer from premature throat erosion and I have seen one of these shoot a sub 3" group at 1000yds.
Just sounds like good old school common sense stuff to me. In today’s world of the truth does not apply to me, I guess he would make no sense.Randy Selby can be pretty obnoxious at times, but sometimes he does make sense.
My 338 Federal on a Tikka T3 just rolls dem lil piggies wid does 200gr Hot-Cor..Speer Hot-Cors for 35yrs and counting![]()
I have watched the majority of his videos, and he is a mixture of fact and opinion. The problems arise when he starts stating his opinion as fact.Just sounds like good old school common sense stuff to me. In today’s world of the truth does not apply to me, I guess he would make no sense.
As a hunter I have learned to HATE solid copper bullets. I know many of you think they are wonderful but I have tried, Barnes, Hammer, and Cutting Edge and simply do not see the terminal performance good bullets create like Terminal Ascent, Bondstrike, Partition, Ballistic Tip or Accubond. Do copper bullets kill deer? Sure but honestly I can kill a deer with a 22 rimfire, that doesn't make it the right bullet.
Even non premium bullets like CoreLokt, SST, and Hot Core perform better than copper in my opinion.
I have many different calibers and have tested copper bullets on deer for three years from 6mm Creedmoor to 300Rum same inconsistent performance half of the time. I like to dump a ton of energy on Target with a strong chance of a passthrough. I am not bragging guys but most of the deer I shoot with Bondstrike or Terminal Ascent FALL OVER IN PLACE, BANG FLOP. I know, I know sometimes they just run regardless but I am telling you out of the last 7 deer shot with Bondstrike bullets they were 100% bang flops (I shoot high shoulder towards the neck). I rarely see this from copper, they do not go far but they do go unless I neck shoot them.
I truly gave solid copper a fair chance, among my many friends I have seen the inconsistency of especially Barnes. To slow doesn't open well, to fast it pin holes. I just do not have time for it and I am over it. Rant over
The final straw was last night my friend had a perfect heart lung with 130ttsx from a 30-06 about 100yards, tracked that stupid deer for an hour went over 100 yards. We skinned it out at my house and it once again was a PIN hole through and through, perfect shot but horrible expansion and complete pass through dumping little to no energy in the deer.
One note in fairness: Copper can be very destructive bullets WHEN heavy bone is hit. I will also concede solid coppers have a place in Africa.
I know all the fans of copper will chime in here with stories and pictures of devastated deer they have killed with copper, good for you, my experience is they are INCONSISTANT, do great one time and the next who knows.
I will be selling off every solid copper bullet I own shortly, I have a bunch!
I'm thinking a roast with a container of whipped cream behind it. To me, lungs feel like whipped cream. Another option instead of the roast (for when you don't hit bone) would be a package of bacon. I always liked Paul Harrel's "meat target" which was ribs, then a bag of oranges, then more ribs.For the suggestion box:
ballistics gel will show you what damage your bullet does, or cheaper, buy a roast, wrap it in plastic wrap, and shoot it.
You didn't get around it, you fell right in their trap, essentially they took your gun and you stood right there and let them do it, that's what they wanted you to do.
I have no agenda.I still have my guns. Except the ones I sold back in the 80's. And several new ones bought in the last several years. Don't push your agenda by analyzing people you know nothing about.
I think that DRT‘s methods of using compressed tungsten may very well be different than how other bullet manufacturers use compressed sintered copper/tin alloys. I’ve not always been impressed with the lead free Nosler BT nor the Varmint Grenades, and from personal experience have seen them not live up to their marketing. That is why I bought enough to try out…and see if there is a difference. They do seem to measure and weigh like lead, and that does promise a little better ballistics vs copper or tin.As for the "new technology" that is not yet available in America, regarding the DRT bullets, he is keenly unaware that we have had such technology in lead-free design here in the U.S for well over ten years, in the form of varmint bullets - such as Hornady NTX, Nosler lead-free Ballistic Tips and Barnes Varmint Grenades as three I can recall offhand that use sintered, compressed compounds. So - why haven't our lead-free ammo producers made them in big-game bullets? I'd go out on a limb and say one doesn't want the bullet to come apart and dump all its energy on impact - which is what that guy seems to think is ideal. If it worked so well on varmints (and they DO), my guess is we would have seen such a product already for big game. Sounds to me like this guy is hoping to be the "expert" to persuade his government to not go lead-free. For that, I don't blame him - but let's get the facts straight - otherwise one loses all credibility on what he says that is true.