Do you feel the thickness of the base of the case effects seating depth, or are you just throwing that out as general information?I've found the thickness of the base of the case can vary ...
I just don't expect perfection. Close as i can get it to what i want is all i can do.
My seating stem got loose once or twice, it's now loktite'd !
These simple things will improve seating consistency very much. Except, instead of imperial wax, I use graphite or Neolube. Your note about spring back is exactly why I mentioned in my comment that using the mandrel right before seating will help a lot.A mandrel is definitely gonna play a big factor in getting consistent neck tension. I also would use some imperial wax on the inside of your neck very very light amount. You also need to keep in mind your brass may spring back as well. Hopefully that’s helpful
Everyone else has their 2 cents in. What’s two more.I sent the Wilson seater stem to Ronnie because it was was not making the consistant proper contact on the bullet.
He opened it up a slight amount and polished it to what now appears to be perfect contact with the tip of the bullet.
Thanks for responding!never stated that sorting bullets by OAL would lead to more consistent BTO measurements.
i have had problems when using an ill fitting stem (too near the tip) on light jacket varmint bullets, even with what i will term a 'reasonable' amount of 'neck tension'. one bullet i tried (i believe it was a nosler small caliber) had no lead under the contact area and the stem would collapse the jacket to varying degrees, causing some bullets to be seated long, even though the coal length looked about right.I don't even know how I could intentionally make my seating depths vary as much
Everyone else has their 2 cents in. What’s two more.
Yes, some the stamp is barely visible !Do you feel the thickness of the base of the case effects seating depth, or are you just throwing that out as general information?
I’m a firm believer in the Accuracy One tool. I’ve only been shooting 600 yard matches for a year and a half but inconsistent results on paper and in seating consistency. First match last year I got small group, the next several matches groups anywhere from 1.5” to 3”. I anneal after each firing, very anal in the loading process but still not happy. Bought the before the last match and practice was great. Best group just over 1”. The next day at the match I shot a .941” group and won the match. I am very confident knowing ever round in each group of five was within .0005”. I’m hooked.I agree, the shoulder to bullet ogive is probably the most important measurement when it comes to seating depth/distance to lands. I've contemplated getting the Accuracy One tool several times...I need to just bite the bullet and get it.
I have their primer pocket and primer seating depth tool and it's very high quality.
It was a similar deal for me. It made an immediate difference on target with no other changes to my routine.I’m a firm believer in the Accuracy One tool. I’ve only been shooting 600 yard matches for a year and a half but inconsistent results on paper and in seating consistency. First match last year I got small group, the next several matches groups anywhere from 1.5” to 3”. I anneal after each firing, very anal in the loading process but still not happy. Bought the before the last match and practice was great. Best group just over 1”. The next day at the match I shot a .941” group and won the match. I am very confident knowing ever round in each group of five was within .0005”. I’m hooked.
Yes, I like my Accuracy One gauge and it is my primary tool to verify seating depth. However, every seating die made indexes off the case base while the A1 gauge indexes off the shoulder. If your sizing die produces a very consistent shoulder bump, then it doesn’t matter. But if you have significant variation in your shoulder bump, that will be directly related to variance in measurement from the Accuracy One gauge and bullet jump to lands.I’m a firm believer in the Accuracy One tool. I’ve only been shooting 600 yard matches for a year and a half but inconsistent results on paper and in seating consistency. First match last year I got small group, the next several matches groups anywhere from 1.5” to 3”. I anneal after each firing, very anal in the loading process but still not happy. Bought the before the last match and practice was great. Best group just over 1”. The next day at the match I shot a .941” group and won the match. I am very confident knowing ever round in each group of five was within .0005”. I’m hooked.
What stamp, the head stamp?Yes, some the stamp is barely visible !
Exactly what I do. The die rests on the shoulders instead of the base and you get amazing consistency of bullet ogive to shoulder.Gluing (locktight) a flat washer in the base of the seater will make the die reference off of the shoulder istead of the base. This will eliminate any error in your shoulder to base dimension of your brass.
View attachment 1518139
I like the way you thinkGluing (locktight) a flat washer in the base of the seater will make the die reference off of the shoulder istead of the base. This will eliminate any error in your shoulder to base dimension of your brass.
View attachment 1518139
Is the stem making good contact all the way around and not bottoming outI checked the seater stem last night when I got home from work, inspecting it with a magnifying glass and good light.
There were clearly no cracks on the stem, I then turned it over and put a bullet in the stem pressing down on it and still no seperations.
Next thought is to try some other brands of bullets, I have some Bibs to try and some Barts.
@Bc'z yes after having it drilled out and polished it is making perfect contact.Is the stem making good contact all the way around and not bottoming out
