Lacking the piece that Joe described, the Hornady headspace gauge (an attachment for calipers, dial or digital) is what I prefer, rather than a Wilson gauge, because I think that the Hornady gauge lends itself to more precise work, and is more versatile and when a number of calibers are reloaded, economical. For setting up a sizing die, the important thing is not the absolute number, but rather the difference in readings comparing a fired to a sized case. With this gauge, if you start out with a new, or even a once fired case, neck sizing a case, with relatively stout loads, you will readily observe how the case shoulder dimension reaches its maximum.
When a round is fired both it and the chamber expand together under the peak pressure, and while the chamber snaps back to its original dimensions, the case will retain a small amount of its expanded size, and over several firings growing a little in its dimensions with each, come to a point where when it snaps back from the pressure of firing, that it is in a slight interference fit with the chamber, causing resistance to be felt as the bolt is closed. The closing cams in the front of a typical front lug bolt action combined with the length of the bold handle, provide the mechanical advantage and mechanism to force the case into a chamber that it is ever so slightly larger than. The main locations of this resistance are at the shoulder to head dimension, and the diameter of the case body near the head of the case. By paying close attention to how much we "bump" (push back) the shoulder when we FL size, brass life is enhanced over what it would be if that clearance was increased to that of an unfired case. I believe that there is also an accuracy advantage to cases more closely fitting the chamber that they are fired in. As I mentioned in my previous post, just because one case that is sized in a die that has been set to bump its shoulder for minimal clearance fits the chamber properly, does not mean that all the cases will respond to the die setting in an identical manner, this is due to the differences in hardness and spring back of even new high quality brass, so some experimentation may be needed to find the setting that gives the minimum bump to the springiest cases in the set. This is another application for the aforementioned gauge. Also, as cases harden with subsequent firings, a die that was set for minimal shoulder bump will have to be reset, because of the progressive work hardening of the brass from repeated firings and FL sizings. More advanced reloaders may anneal cases to, among other things, reduce the variance in bump within a given set of cases, at a given die setting.
Finally a word about SAAMI specifications...Rifles vary in the sizes of their chambers due to manufacturing tolerances and reamer wear, so the specifications for new ammunition assure that it is small enough to fit in the smallest chamber that falls within a specified range. This results in ammunition that does not fit most chambers as closely as would be desired for best accuracy. My point being that you have the advantage of knowing the size of the chamber that you are loading for, and so have no reason to recreate the clearances that new ammunition manufacturers must, and if fact have good reasons not to.