wouldn't this make an ideal round? Would the case eventually need to be resized?
Webster, probably 'No' and probably 'Yes'.
A pointer to what provides ultimate accuracy comes from benchrest shooting practice where shooters resize their brass between relays despite running with only 0.001" neck to chamber clearances and necks that are turned to a thickness consistency of 0.0001". You can be pretty sure that rifles capable of winning BR matches have as concentric chambers as current technology can provide too!
There are all sorts of factors involved in these processes and using the fired case as is may not, in fact almost certainly will not, provide the best mix of the amount of neck tension on the bullet, consistent neck tension on the bullet across a batch of loaded rounds, and alignment with the bore centreline.
A much better answer is to:
minimally turn necks to obtain a consistent thickness within each neck and between cases.
use a bushing sizer die, either neck or full-length type, and experiment with bushing sizes to see what amount of neck tension gives best results.
allied to the the use of bushing dies, dispense with expander balls or other forms of neck expansion. However, a sizing-down only regime should only be employed with neck-turned brass, otherwise variations in neck thickness are transferred from the outside of the neck to the inside and the bullet has to swage the inner walls back out on being seated - that's one reason why nearly all 'standard' dies have an expander.
If simply de and repriming, charging and bullet seating gives good enough accuracy in your rifle for you, there's no particular reason to change practices. If you start to have hard chambering and extraction due to brass flow changing the case shape, simply employ a standard FL sizer die or a more specialised 'body' die to size the case body back down and re-set the shoulder slightly further back.
Laurie,
York, England