FWIW, not that it’s important, but been told that results in an oblong chamber.It's easy to cut an off-center chamber is a lathe. Just feed it faster than the tool will handle. Now an off-center chamber that is off by a specific amount requires a 4 jaw chuck and a lot of time. I doubt that any receiver manufactures require and off-center chamber in the barrel.
And that's why you shouldn't entirely trust AI.G'day blokes. I was chatting to a mate who shoots an Anschutz in our benchrest competition (I use a CZ), he said that Anschutz suggests that (I've used the AI answer) "Anschutz .22 LR rifle should generally have its action and chamber cleaned every 200–500 rounds to prevent functioning issues, while the bore should be deep-cleaned, using a proper cleaning rod and bore guide, every 500–1,000 rounds or when accuracy degrades." he tends to leave the cleaning to 1000 rounds the dreaded 'carbon ring' builds up in some chambers faster than others.
Well, FWIW, Anschutz has been generally wrong in that regard for some time.G'day blokes. I was chatting to a mate who shoots an Anschutz in our benchrest competition (I use a CZ), he said that Anschutz suggests that (I've used the AI answer) "Anschutz .22 LR rifle should generally have its action and chamber cleaned every 200–500 rounds to prevent functioning issues, while the bore should be deep-cleaned, using a proper cleaning rod and bore guide, every 500–1,000 rounds or when accuracy degrades." he tends to leave the cleaning to 1000 rounds the dreaded 'carbon ring' builds up in some chambers faster than others. My S&W 17 will show a buildup of carbon(?) after a few matches, however, not all of the chambers in the cylinder show the same degree of fouling build-up. Could some chambers be a bit tighter than others?
If you see the buildup at the bottom of the chamber first, thats most probably gravity or some gas + unburnt powder and carbon is leaking back under the case. Did the pressure of firing (23-25 thousand PSI) expand the case to seal the chamber and stop gas leaking back and starting a carbon build up? I really don't see this as a problem if you clean the gun after a session/match at the range with a pull through or bore snake (it's an army thing), I run a dry brush through the barrel and dry patch at home. Shock-horror, sometimes I leave this to the next day... My favorite gun cleaning products are Hoppe's #9 and Mill spec Break Free CLP and good clean brushes. Frequent cleaning won't wear your gun out but it will prevent carbon buildup.
Way back when, they also said a .22 rimfire never needs cleaning!Well.
The dead horse got revived again.
Before the consumer economical availability of "barrel sellers" (I mean bore scopes)
Carbon ring what?.
What are you talking about, never heard of that?
Nobody had, a carbon dissolving solvent in thier cleaning kit.
Because nobody was trying to remove a thing they could not see,
1 step further.
Ask Eley, Lapua.
What were thier tightest ammo test results back in 1980s?
1990s?
And you'll soon find that in the last 10 years of bore scopes, solvents. Special soaking cleaning carbon removing rituals.
The factory testing shows no better accuracy now than back then 4 decades prior to carbon rings and bore scopes.
Just food for thought
Precisely.Way back when, they also said a .22 rimfire never needs cleaning!
any competitive shooter now cleans regularly some even with a bronze brush no less.
Lee
I don't agree on scores at least in RFBR. scores have been the highest they have ever been. most of that is on the ammo, but again almost everyone shooting sanctioned RFBR will clean in some way between targets.Precisely.
And as I mentioned.
Accuracy and scores were eqaul to today's is my point.
Ever sent a rifle to one of the test centers?I don't agree on scores at least in RFBR. scores have been the highest they have ever been. most of that is on the ammo, but again almost everyone shooting sanctioned RFBR will clean in some way between targets.
Lee
I have been to the Lapua Mesa center 3 times last was this past August, I am waiting to go again hopefully in April-May the Midas+ plus I got in August gave me my best scores this ARA past season.Ever sent a rifle to one of the test centers?
Great day great score!!I have been to the Lapua Mesa center 3 times last was this past August, I am waiting to go again hopefully in April-May the Midas+ plus I got in August gave me my best scores this ARA past season.
my cleaning regime is 1-wet VFG pellet then 3 dry pellets during a match between targets at home deep clean with a bronze brush.
Lee
I had more than a great day this past season, I had several enough to win 3 State tournaments and 2 State overall UL in points. I won 7 out 9 tournaments I shot in.Great day great score!!
How m?any times at test center between the 500 or so rounds fired testing your rifles did they clean it
I hate when that happened. Good old days, no limits.I had more than a great day this past season, I had several enough to win 3 State tournaments and 2 State overall UL in points. I won 7 out 9 tournaments I shot in.
This last visit I found the lot of Midas+ after 40 rounds fired. they do an initial 10 shot then follow up with another 10 if it shows promise. they only shoot enough to find the lot that will be the best. I never had to shoot 500 rds. during these times they wouldn't have 50 lots to test anyway. the 2nd time (2019) I went I cleaned the rifles after every 30-40 shots I left with 5 cases of ammo the good old days of plentiful ammo!
Lee
probable should have known something was up when they no longer kept the ammo you tested there.I hate when that happened. Good old days, no limits.
Lee,you’re arguing with an RFC luminary without a clue, might as well be talking to a block of wood.I have been to the Lapua Mesa center 3 times last was this past August, I am waiting to go again hopefully in April-May the Midas+ plus I got in August gave me my best scores this ARA past season.
my cleaning regime is 1-wet VFG pellet then 3 dry pellets during a match between targets at home deep clean with a bronze brush.
Lee
Prove me wrong----Lee,you’re arguing with an RFC luminary without a clue, might as well be talking to a block of wood.
This is the guy says ARA score no better over 25 years.
You can’t fix stupid.
I’d like to see those factory tests. Where are they? And 40 years ago. Maybe Olympic, International guys have that data?Well.
The dead horse got revived again.
Before the consumer economical availability of "barrel sellers" (I mean bore scopes)
Carbon ring what?.
What are you talking about, never heard of that?
Nobody had, a carbon dissolving solvent in thier cleaning kit.
Because nobody was trying to remove a thing they could not see,
1 step further.
Ask Eley, Lapua.
What were thier tightest ammo test results back in 1980s?
1990s?
And you'll soon find that in the last 10 years of bore scopes, solvents. Special soaking cleaning carbon removing rituals.
The factory testing shows no better accuracy now than back then 4 decades prior to carbon rings and bore scopes.
Just food for thought
