• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Bottom Eject?

Guys,

Are there any real world advantages to building a LR BR rig using a bottom eject action?

I want to order a Borden BRMMF but Im unsure whether to go RBLPRE or RBLPBE

I would welcome any thoughts or experiences, the case will most likely be a BRA but also maybe something based on the 6.5x47 size.

My current rig is RBLPRE and that works great, I wasn't sure if bottom eject has any benefits though.
 
The only advantage I see is you don't have to do something to catch the brass. It falls directly under the stock. I've always laid a towel down anyway and now that's ALL I have to do to catch my brass.
 
Well your not gonna do a 47 case. They are set up for br cases, which is what you should run anyhow in LR BR. The lack of ejector does a couple things. You can run hotter loads and not get extractor flow. This is not worth much but if your right on the edge it may help cases live longer. You dont have to remove the ejector to check headspace or seating depth. Cases fall in a pile and dont get thrown off the bench or get dinged necks. It comes down mainly to personal preference and there are guys that love it one way or the other. Its not going to effect your groups or how you place. You cant go wrong either way
 
Well your not gonna do a 47 case. They are set up for br cases, which is what you should run anyhow in LR BR. The lack of ejector does a couple things. You can run hotter loads and not get extractor flow. This is not worth much but if your right on the edge it may help cases live longer. You dont have to remove the ejector to check headspace or seating depth. Cases fall in a pile and dont get thrown off the bench or get dinged necks. It comes down mainly to personal preference and there are guys that love it one way or the other. Its not going to effect your groups or how you place. You cant go wrong either way

It does affect your groups and where you place when your brass tumbles off where its not supposed to and breaks the zone youre in. Even more so when you hear brass hitting the ground from the next bench and you think you may get em mixed up!!
 
Guys,

Are there any real world advantages to building a LR BR rig using a bottom eject action?

I want to order a Borden BRMMF but Im unsure whether to go RBLPRE or RBLPBE

I would welcome any thoughts or experiences, the case will most likely be a BRA but also maybe something based on the 6.5x47 size.

My current rig is RBLPRE and that works great, I wasn't sure if bottom eject has any benefits though.

I saw on their site that there are drop ports that will work for 284 Win, so it seems 6.5x47 should work???
 
If you go with a BRL (long action)
How is the bolt converted from a left port eject to a bottom eject when an action is converted to a bottom eject? I have a Teddy action RB/LP that I have considered having converted to drop port.
 
I have a couple not so brilliant questions;
1) Are you installing the ejector at 12 o-clock and the extractor at 6 o-clock?
2) How dot they load rounds without the round falling through the bottom?
 
I may be making an over simplified assumption, but it sounds as though any rifle can be converted by replacing the bolt and leaving the mag or bottom metal out.
 
It would be easy on a Savage, make plug to fit the magazine opening that has the proper size cut out for the case to drop through. Take the ejector out and pug it, remove the extractor and replace it with a Sako style at 6:00 and it would be the safest because of the second set lugs that block the raceways Plus you could cone the bolt face and barrel and it would feed better....... Jim
 
Oh, so the bottom port is only wide enough to allow the case to drop through. This also helps with the loading as the opening being narrow makes it easier to insert the round into the chamber without it dropping through.
Cool concept.
With my XLR Evolution chassis, I could make an insert that would lock into the magazine well that would restrict the opening. Then all I would need is a Remington 700 bolt with the 6 o-clock ejector.
 
Sounds good except for on a rem. two lug when it is closed the 6:00 sako extractor is in the race way. If it blows a case you will be the first to know. I believe when Stiller came up with this he used a Remington extractor at 6:00 to be safe....... Jim
 
Sounds good except for on a rem. two lug when it is closed the 6:00 sako extractor is in the race way. If it blows a case you will be the first to know. I believe when Stiller came up with this he used a Remington extractor at 6:00 to be safe....... Jim
Well I do NOT use a Sako extractor on the bottom eject actions so your comment does NOT apply. The extractor I use is internal to boldface and there are no external cuts to the bolt body
 
The no ejector thing is a big deal for me. Meaning, I like not having one to remove when finding length at lands.

The Kelbly TG ejector works great and doesn't put pressure on the case head when the bolt is in battery. Best of both worlds even if you don't use a drop port.

PremierAccuracyActions36.jpg
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,900
Messages
2,206,088
Members
79,207
Latest member
bbkersch
Back
Top