+1 for the Lyman Bore-cam.
Note: for barrel cleaning, I prefer the Lyman Bore-cam over the higher magnified Hawkeye borescope.
@Sniper338
Also have a Teslong Bore-scope (NTS150B) that I like very much.
But it only works in 6.5-cal or bigger bores (it has a mirror diameter to big for smaller bores).
It is clearer/better image and better lighting then the Lyman - IMO
I need 20 cal and up.... dats the problemo!
A Lyman is plenty good to scare you with.
Setup up and buy the Hawkeye. It is more money but worth every penny. You will never be sorry you bought it. I couldn't live without mine. Best piece of equipment I have ever bought.Looking for a borescope to check for carbon build-up in my rifles. Any ideas? thanks
Having heard unpleasant stories about the Lyman falling apart on people and also being unwilling to spend $$$ on a Hawkeye (for now), I went for a low-cost optical option at $350: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B077LBTCH1/?tag=accuratescom-20
Been using it for a couple of weeks and it seems to do what I need. It comes with a right angle eyepiece as standard and a cell phone (camera) holder attachment. It will fit down a .22 with the right angle mirror tube and it fits a .177 without it. Without the angle tube you get an image with a blurry center and some detail around the edges, which is probably all you can get optically and much better than no image at all.
It's doing the job so far. Hard to say how it compares since I've not used a Hawkeye or Lyman.
Not trying to be a smart personHaving heard unpleasant stories about the Lyman falling apart on people and also being unwilling to spend $$$ on a Hawkeye (for now), I went for a low-cost optical option at $350: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B077LBTCH1/?tag=accuratescom-20
Been using it for a couple of weeks and it seems to do what I need. It comes with a right angle eyepiece as standard and a cell phone (camera) holder attachment. It will fit down a .22 with the right angle mirror tube and it fits a .177 without it. Without the angle tube you get an image with a blurry center and some detail around the edges, which is probably all you can get optically and much better than no image at all.
It's doing the job so far. Hard to say how it compares since I've not used a Hawkeye or Lyman.
Not lately. I bought to scope to confirm it's not a fouling issue. The scope has confirmed that.Not trying to be a smart person
But does it shoot
That all that matters