Received the GemPro250 and have been working with it for 2 weeks now. Not all good news.
It takes me between 12 and 15 minutes to weigh 20 charges using my RCBS 505 beam scale. With the GemPro it's taking 24 to 30 minutes, double the time required.
I've taken identical loads with powder charges weighed with the 505 and the GemPro, ran them over the new Magnetospeed (excellent chronograph) and the SD and ES numbers are basically the same, or slightly greater with the GemPro charges, so no advantage there. 5 shot groups at 100 yards with 22 & 6ppc's of proven accuracy show no difference.
And finally, the plastic pan and "tweezers" they include are worthless junk that belong in the trash can.
It does do an excellent job of sorting bullets by weight, what I suspect it was originally designed for. Weight sorted a box of 85, 107SMK's that varied from 106.5 to 107.8 (all out of the same box of 100), in about 10 minutes, super fast compared to the time required using the 505.
Since I seldom weigh bullets though, not enough reason to keep it.
It takes me between 12 and 15 minutes to weigh 20 charges using my RCBS 505 beam scale. With the GemPro it's taking 24 to 30 minutes, double the time required.
I've taken identical loads with powder charges weighed with the 505 and the GemPro, ran them over the new Magnetospeed (excellent chronograph) and the SD and ES numbers are basically the same, or slightly greater with the GemPro charges, so no advantage there. 5 shot groups at 100 yards with 22 & 6ppc's of proven accuracy show no difference.
And finally, the plastic pan and "tweezers" they include are worthless junk that belong in the trash can.
It does do an excellent job of sorting bullets by weight, what I suspect it was originally designed for. Weight sorted a box of 85, 107SMK's that varied from 106.5 to 107.8 (all out of the same box of 100), in about 10 minutes, super fast compared to the time required using the 505.
Since I seldom weigh bullets though, not enough reason to keep it.
