• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Benefits of a tuner

I always thought that a tuner would work in 600/1000 Shooting by tuning the load to the best ES and SD possible, then using the tuner to adjust the harmonics of the barrel. However, I rarely read of many long range shooters doing this.

I am 100% positive that the tuners I use in competition work, because I do shoot competition on a regular basis and have learned to use the tuner At opportune times.

In Short Range Group or Score, a tuner will not cure sub par bullets, a non optimum powder charge, a mediocre barrel, or any other of the usual items that we are trying to optimize In order to achieve a competitive tune.

It is simply a tool that allows you to change something instantly when things get a little ragged.
Jackie, a lot of guys have tried that in LR. It just doesnt work out. Some es even at 1k is not a bad thing. I dont know why but the best groups seem to have a little es. Not a lot but around 10. Im not saying the 2 and 3 ft es groups cant be good, but its uncanny how many tiny ones have around 10-12.
 
I’ve never touched a tuner. My rifles don’t have them. I’ve considered getting one to play with. My assumption has been that just as trajectory changes with changes in DA, so do groups. My theory is that a tuner could help dial that out.
 
I did this test with my best load in a 6mm BRX trued Rem 700 1-8 29'' Krieger barrel McMillan Tooley stock . I put a DSB Open on . The reason I went with this one because the there was minimal metal to be removed to install it . I also have tuner brake but I will go back to just a tuner.

I shot 2 groups and let it cool moved the tuner 2 marks and so on . This was all shot same day same load thru out .
So I do believe you can use the tuner to get a couple nodes that work that will get the most out of the rifle .
I feel this not a good example of what a tuner is capable of.
In competition there's no cool down period between shots, in your testing you let it cool after a couple groups.
For validation reshoot it with no cool down just like your battling it out for X count.
 
I'm a SR Score shooter. Last season, I made the decision to work with a tuner on my 30BR. After some legwork, I went with Mike Ezell's PDT 7 oz. unit for a variety of reasons. Mike fitted the tuner to my Kreiger 17 twist barrel I'd been shooting as it was a known quantity. The accuracy w/o the tuner remained the same as before any muzzle work for fitting the tuner was done. When conditions were finally decent enough to test the tuner, I followed Mike's proceedure with three shot groups @ 100 yds. The test target is posted below:
bshBqSNh.jpg


The next day, I continued on with the testing. The wind speed was up a tick and the direction had changed 180 degree but it was about as good as we get here. This is that target:
vB105nkh.jpg


The sine wave is very evident...though not as as evident as Mike likes to see. We have differing opinions on that and the cause/effect. ;)

I shot the tuner for the rest of the season and won a Grand Agg, a couple yardages and usually finished in the Top 5 in registered NBRSA competition. I also won a 200 and the Grand w/o the tuner. Did the tuner make the barrel shoot smaller? No. Did it give me another tuning aid? Yes. Did I use it as a tuning aid during competition? A couple of times. In some respects, a 30BR is probably the worst test subject for a tuner due to it's broad tune window with H4198. But there's no question as to whether the tuner acts like it should. It does.

Did it help me? In one instance, yes. At the end of the season, we had a club match that was a combination of Group and Score. We shot five Group targets (5 shots) for an Agg and then we shot five Score targets for an Agg. It was high 40's that day with gusty winds from 4-5 o'clock at 15-20 mph. We started with the Group portion and there was almost a bullet of vertical on my targets. I decided to leave the vertical 'in' to possibly(?) dampen the horizontal a bit. I ended up winning the Group Agg with a .214. All the other competitors targets showed a bunch of horizontal 'weather reports'. Mine still had the vertical but it was less than the others horizontal. In the Score portion, I took the vertical out with two numbers on the tuner. Being really careful with the flags, I ended up winning the Score Agg also. This was the second year in a row for me with the Group/Score win. Kinda' fun. :)
fWOuRq8l.jpg


Mike just fitted a new Bartlein 17 twist for his tuner and that's on the gun now. Once the load is finalized w/o a tuner, I'll repeat the process. This barrel is a bit shorter than the Kreiger so it will be interesting to see if the sine wave acts similar.

For what it's worth......
 
Last edited:
Another example

IMG_6834.jpegIMG_6835.jpegIMG_6836.jpeg

I have a notebook full of these targets that travels with me to every match for reference.

I have several friends that are tuner paralyzed…… just cannot bring themselves to adjusting their tuner at a match.

Being willing to put in the work and use/spend the resources to learn how to use the tool was fundamental I’m my understanding.

I do develop/learn at longer ranges in conditions.

CW
 
Here's a copy and paste of a thread I posted a few years ago. I'm not saying that you should skip load development but this is a good example of what you can do with a tuner, once you get comfortable with using them and knowing what to look for...
In simple terms, I don't typically use a tuner to shortcut load work. Rather, I do the load work, tuning for peak potential and a wide powder tune window when possible..then use the tuner to maintain peak tune, typically for the entire life of the bbl if I have the components on hand to do so. If I change anything about the load, I confirm tuner setting and make any changes needed, if any.

I posted this story on another site but thought others may find it interesting and am posting here, too.

The story is based on a rifle I bought last year, which had another maker's tuner on it when I got it. This tuner uses a slightly smaller thread diameter than mine, so rather than cutting an inch of new barrel off, I shot with it, as is.

Here goes...

I've been working with tuners for several years now...won't go back to shooting without one.

I bought the gun a bukys tuner was on, last year. I had built the gun for a friend and he didn't shoot it hardly at all. He wanted to try a Bukys on this gun and except for the tuner, he let me build the rifle as if I were building a gun for myself.

Anyway, first time out with the rifle was at a match. I went pre-loaded with an unkown rifle, unknown load, another maker's tuner and put the scope on the night before the match.

When I got to the match I had not fired the gun and the scope was off considerably, but was on paper with my first shot so, I fired one round on target and adjusted the reticle to the bullet hole.

Then I went to my sighter and fired a 3 shot group. The gun was COMPLETELY out of tune. The 3 shot group was near 1/2".. HUGE!

I made an adjustment based on experience with tuners in the past and fired another 3 shot group....Now the tune was close. I made one more small adjustment and did the same thing..another 3 shot group, and this one was small, maybe a low .1.

I had gone from a gun that was just on paper, completely out of tune, with an unknown gun an unknown load, and someone else's tuner on the gun, to a very competitive tune.

Here comes the good part...I did this in under 2 minutes, during my 3 minute warm-up per UBR!!


That, my friends, is what tuners do!

If you have any doubts about tuners and their use, call me. I love this stuff and am happy to share my experiences with tuners. Yes, I prefer my own tuner for various reasons but for the most part, they all work on the same principle and the above story is a very classic example of that. Feel free to post your own experiences with tuners.

--Mike Ezell


I've done this several times now. You may never beat it but the thing is, you simply can't know if you are getting everything the gun and load can offer unless you do the load work up first. Actually, I know several that use them like this. Just throw a known good load at a new bbl and within just a few marks on the tuner, it may be as good as it can be right there. You just can't know though.
 
Last edited:
Tuners. I have tried them and I proved to myself that I could eliminate vertical at 1K. I travel long distances to matches and prefer to pre-load. I did the load development with the tuner on the rifle with the tuner at zero. The tuner was only there to help re-tune the load if the rifle went out of tune because of temperature, elevation (barometric pressure) etc.

With that being said I believe the key to reliability is simplicity. The tuner adds one more piece to the rifle, a moving part at that. I have since learned to seat long and make adjustments to the tune with seating depth at the match. During load development, I also search for the widest tune window I can find. That may not be where the rifle shoots the absolute smallest, but it will be where the rifle shoots the most consistently. Usually my tune is right on, traveling from PA as far South as GA as far West as MT and lots of places in between. Develop a “Lazy” tune and you probably won’t need to retune period. Go to a match with a super accurate tune that’s right on the edge and you may get away with it, but it will often blow up. Then you better have a tuner or the ability to load, or at least change seating depth, at the match.

Dave.
 
Last edited:
We in FClass have Top Men working on advancing the science behind precision rifles.

Here's 2 of the best I know of testing the arcane and esoteric topic of powder burn rates and the effects of humidity on tune.

1000004330.jpg





And another of the finest LR shooters i know testing the effects of fine tuning your ignition system for optimal results on target.

 
Jackie, a lot of guys have tried that in LR. It just doesnt work out. Some es even at 1k is not a bad thing. I dont know why but the best groups seem to have a little es. Not a lot but around 10. Im not saying the 2 and 3 ft es groups cant be good, but its uncanny how many tiny ones have around 10-12.
Tuners may not be in much use at 600 and 1K, but there is one notable exception on the books. The current IBS 600 yd. HG record (.311)was shot by Bart Sauter using an Ezell tuner.
 
We have been discussing multiple methods. What way do you think Bart was using it
When I replied to Jackie I was talking about guys tuning for low es then using the tuner to bring in the groups. Its been tried and doesnt seem to be the best way. Bart told me how he uses a tuner, its quite different than the common methods. Im not going say how because its been years since we talked about it and dont want to post incorrect info.
 
When I replied to Jackie I was talking about guys tuning for low es then using the tuner to bring in the groups. Its been tried and doesnt seem to be the best way. Bart told me how he uses a tuner, its quite different than the common methods. Im not going say how because its been years since we talked about it and dont want to post incorrect info.
@BartsBullets
 
When I replied to Jackie I was talking about guys tuning for low es then using the tuner to bring in the groups. Its been tried and doesnt seem to be the best way. Bart told me how he uses a tuner, its quite different than the common methods. Im not going say how because its been years since we talked about it and dont want to post incorrect info.
IMO leaning what high level testers have found does not work is like handing out money, and time. Thanks.
 
Correct, but the tuner was not used in the way we were discussing.
It clearly was in tune. The method of finding tune might vary but I doubt it would have shot like that, out of tune. Anything is possible, I guess. I have my method of finding a sweet spot and others have theirs. If it works, it works, though.
 
There are many records shot through the years without tuners. My old gunsmith who is gone now said that he shot some of his best groups 100/200 without a tuner. However, the last several years that he shot (6ppc), he never moved it during a match and felt that it gave him a wider node. My own experience with the short game 100/200 ppc and 6BR had varying experiences and it became an issue of simply using a known load with and without the tuner. I had the tuner off the BR at a match and decided to check velocity with my Magnetospeed and just that little bit of weight turned so-so groups into killer groups. I shot the next two strings with chrono and had best 5 group I ever shot with that rifle. I think those responding here who use and sell tuners, know what they are doing. Across 6-7 calibers I have used them on, they have nothing for me past 500 yards. Shooting in the wind simply does not illustrate for me that the tuner is doing any good. If the tuner was responsible for the record, why are the other groups not that small?? I would never take anything away from Bart because he has set records without tuners! However, Like others said, how much time do you want to spend in order to know what the hell you are doing?? My hat is off to those who know!
 
There are many records shot through the years without tuners. My old gunsmith who is gone now said that he shot some of his best groups 100/200 without a tuner. However, the last several years that he shot (6ppc), he never moved it during a match and felt that it gave him a wider node. My own experience with the short game 100/200 ppc and 6BR had varying experiences and it became an issue of simply using a known load with and without the tuner. I had the tuner off the BR at a match and decided to check velocity with my Magnetospeed and just that little bit of weight turned so-so groups into killer groups. I shot the next two strings with chrono and had best 5 group I ever shot with that rifle. I think those responding here who use and sell tuners, know what they are doing. Across 6-7 calibers I have used them on, they have nothing for me past 500 yards. Shooting in the wind simply does not illustrate for me that the tuner is doing any good. If the tuner was responsible for the record, why are the other groups not that small?? I would never take anything away from Bart because he has set records without tuners! However, Like others said, how much time do you want to spend in order to know what the hell you are doing?? My hat is off to those who know!
To me, they are the easiest method to learn. Jme, but I find those with a good head and no preconceived notions either way to be the easiest to help and quickest to catch on to them but I think the same could be said of any tuning method.

Yes, wind and distance are certainly big factors but again, same either way. Which brings us to what tuners really are..they are a tool to tune with. Nothing really more than that.
A good rule of thumb is to leave the tuner alone unless you would get up and change your load. IOW, don't move it unless you know why you're moving it, for sure. But once again, same goes for other methods of tuning.

Do you know how much too bump your load up or down to keep up with conditions. I hope so, or would you randomly just change powder charges. Same kinda thing, yet again. It's a tool, not a crutch.

My method of finding the best base tuner setting is based very much on what I learned about reading group shapes over the years, before we had tuners in centerfire..or most of us. The tuner test I use is just a methodical approach that shows you basically the same group shapes as would happen if you break down powder charge increments to quantities equal to one mark on my tuner and how far between sweet spots. The same test would do the same thing with powder charge increments. The trick is knowing increment values relative to group shape, be that say, one mark at a time or 3 tenths of powder at a time...just an example but that's very close to right if we were only talking a 6ppc and n133.
Just imagine charting out 15 three shot groups, changing powder charge .3 at a time. Essentially the same. I'm just moving a tuner a mark at a time instead of my powder measure and watching what the test shows.

I hope all of this makes some sense. It's so much easier to do than to explain on forums.

Bottom line is, a tuner does very much the same thing as changing powder charge but you can leave your reloading gear at home. That's how I use tuners. There are still others that use them and still change powder charge as well. Not my way but if it works for them, that's awesome by me.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,792
Messages
2,202,872
Members
79,108
Latest member
Nitrogrrl
Back
Top