CJ6
Silver $$ Contributor
Bolt gun or AR data?Lyman goes up to 27.
Bolt gun or AR data?Lyman goes up to 27.
All my powder has been bought new, and is separated in clearly marked original containers. It was definitely H335.Are you sure that the powder has not been contaminated by someone accidentally putting a fast burning powder in it?
If I had a situation where my gun blew up, and everything measured correctly, the first thing I would blame is the powder.
Thing is, other than this reloaded box of 250 rounds, the rifles had been fired lots before, no problems.What do you mean when you say we tested the powder? How did you test it? Is the powder commercially packaged H335 or milsurp pulldown. Did you check the bullet dia with a mic? Bad brass? Unsupported case head in the chamber? Maybe an issue with the rifles not the ammo?
Can only find case measures, not chamber measures anywhere, even Brownells.Have you measured your chamber? If the barrels from the two blown up rifles are still around.
The reason I ask is if the chamber were right at 1.760, the cases that are 1.765 would be crimped by the throat and cause higher pressure.
Brownells sells a really cheap chamber measure.
If you have a borescope you can insert a case into the chamber and insert the borescope from the muzzle.
I was thinking after reading so much, that a number of variables might have happened. A charge on the high side, yet not over published specs, along with smaller volume military brass, and then the longer case crimping causing a pressure spike. Even with those variables, would that cause the bolt carrier to split, the upper crack, and the ejector to fly out? Along with a destroyed magazine. Maybe the small variances just added up?The bold print is conflicting.
Just like in the last thread where the gun blew up, your load is suspect. The last one blew up with less powder, loaded to a longer length. So this load was hotter than the last. And again the charge weight was over max in some data, and a starting load in others.
One more piece of information is trim length. 1.765” is over max length. At that length, a cartridge with 0 headspace could have as little as .007” clearance from the end of the neck to the the transition taper in the chamber to bullet diameter. There the case neck will pinch the bullet and cause a pressure spike.
New brass, or brass sized with the die touching the shell holder for maximum headspace, will most likely give you brass that is at or below minimum spec. About .010” shorter than max length.
What that will allow is for the case to move forward in the chamber .010”, where you have .007” clearance. Effectively headspacing off the rim of the neck. Then the neck stretches when fired creating a tighter crimp.
Overcharging and crimping the bullet in the chamber due to Long brass is a pretty likely answer.
Yes,it is possible that a long case could have caused it. Realize also, that inconsistent lengths also cause inconsistent crimp force. If your die was set to properly crimp a case at 1.755, and you run in a case at 1.765, much greater crimp force is applied. Regardless of what you have been told, 223 brass will rarely chamber much past 1.770, and the brass has been stretched so far by then that case head separation is likely. The reloading specs are there for a reason. Internet BS is just that.Hey, I am willing to learn. I just wanted facts and personal experiences. According to all the data I have read, none of those variables should have caused this. You can bet, I will be more meticulous in further reloading, and I am going to trim under spec, like the new brass you get. No more mixed brass, I'm going to start with new. Defensive because I wanted information or comments like yours, not someone's opinion of 'double charges' which they were hardly that. They were all within book specs. I always start two grains under max. and usually stay there. Lyman goes up to 27 so I don't see the problem. Do you think it might have been a long case that crimped in the chamber, and still locked up? I have read numerous reloaders who load up to 1.800 and they have had no problems. I don't get it, but I won't do that. How do you 'test fire' a charge weight safely?
Have I ever had what happen?Have you ever had this happen, and what happe
Did you contact Hogdon?Commercially packaged in the bottle right from Midway.
What information do you need, and have you ever had this happen?
I really don’t need any more data or info. Between the two threads I think it’s clearly a load problem. The question is what.I was thinking after reading so much, that a number of variables might have happened. A charge on the high side, yet not over published specs, along with smaller volume military brass, and then the longer case crimping causing a pressure spike. Even with those variables, would that cause the bolt carrier to split, the upper crack, and the ejector to fly out? Along with a destroyed magazine. Maybe the small variances just added up?
Have I personally blown up not just one gun, but two? No.Would a case length cause that though? I read lots of threads of guys who don't even trim. They shoot up to 1.800 with no problems. For 250 rounds I weight the first three charges and throw the rest, because usually H335 is close enough to spec, and since the charge weight is 23.5 and Lyman goes up to 27 grains, I figure one grain off isn't goind to cause this. I have to go back and measure BOTH chambers now. The first rifle I rebuilt and immediately went out and successfully shot 20 rounds of H335 at 22 grains. Have you ever had this happen?
YupTwo different AR 15’s blown up with the same load.
Let’s blame the rifle.
Lyman manual uses Colt AR15 universal receiver. jdBolt gun or AR data?
