jelenko
Gold $$ Contributor
I think this has been true for some time and across various sports.if you have best you automatically win.
Golf comes to mind as an example.
I played competitive tennis in high school and college. Same thing.
I think this has been true for some time and across various sports.if you have best you automatically win.
I believe this to be true.Interestingly, I'm not seeing this in the Precision Rifle Series. It had exploded in popularity among younger shooters and firearm magazine publications have leaned more toward it.
The last sentence speaks volumes. . . . Even if you have top shelf equipment, lots of information from sites like this one and even a good mentor to help you out, the learning curve can still be pretty steep.I will also say it’s not $$$$ related. Lots of 4x4 side by sides, boats and campers parked in yards. Neighbors have a side by side highly modified, goes out once a year. Other neighbors have campers and go to “the lake” for 1 weekend a year. I know of a couple of boats that have more hours on them being towed from storage to home and then back to storage, than total hours in the water.
I stepped into various shooting sports in the mid 80’s. Newly married and one kid. I scrimped and saved and bought a gun for said discipline. Then later bought my own loading equipment.
Young crowd knows little of wants and needs today. If they want it they will come to the conclusion they need it, no matter what.
I have also seen the, it’s too hard crowd and the crowd that didn’t win a prize. Take their ball and go home.
Interestingly, by your own comments, someone wins. Sometimes, there is value in being outscored (beaten), especially by your children or those you have coached.I run a monthly long range silhouette match at my club. It's for 22 LR rifles with metallic animal targets at 50, 100, 150 and 200 meters. It's known simply as a "fun match." There are no winners. Your only competitor is yourself. Do better than last time and you can grin about it. If you don't, then there's always next time.
We see anything from iron-sighted 10/22's to Voodoo's. There is no equipment race because there are no winners. The price of entry is whatever 22 you have and a couples boxes of ammo. Honestly, we're all winners because we seem to have silly grins on our faces. By far, the biggest grins come from Dads when their kids outscore them with Dad's rifle. Not long ago, one Dad got beat by both daughters in one match; with his rifle!. That resulted a bunch of grins from the family and from fellow shooters.
No winners, just grinners. And it takes us back to our childhood of plinking at cans with 22's.
Plenty of fun to be had without being in a competition or at a range. Does nobody else just go shoot? Alone or a couple buddies or the kids. They sell targets, and whatever else is available at a range. After 4 threads, could this be the answer, for low attendance? I wouldn’t know. Maybe people are more inclined to shoot what, when, how, and wherever they want, maybe multiple times a day, I do. I do a couple local shoots in the spring but it’s really casual and fun group of people. Maybe I’m not growing the sport but I’m having fun.I live in Charlotte with approximately a million people in the area. In two weeks we will have a 300yd Fclass match with 6-8 shooters, a few years ago it was 30-40 and most were non members. With over 2500 members and consistently growing, it is the same situation for other matches too. Many shooters, fewer competitors, looks to be an age related interest.
True on many points. I shoot F-Class so I am not immune. How many matches have you been to that the shooters are complaining about the pit service or the e-targets being out of calibration at every pause in the match?Its a combination. To some its boring. Thats not to be a put down to either group. Just because someone doesnt like your discipline doesnt mean theyre computer addicted lazy kids. Sometimes people dont like what you like. And the opposite is true, doesnt make an old man a cranky dinosaur because he doesnt like PRS. What we all should be worried about is youth shooting numbers of any discipline. We need to come together and work toward it but ive never seen a bigger group of whiny gotta have it my ways than the 65-80 crowd. Nor have I ever seen a larger group of people my age, (30s) unwilling to humble themselves and learn something. Everybody is a know it all. Kids are suffering from that.
I recently volunteered my time, my guns, my ammo to start a youth shoot at my club. I spoke to 3 match directors. I was told kids today would rather play video games, sit on social media and their parents arent any better Well ok if thats gonna be the attitude then youre driving them away. We should be concerned that numbers in general are dropping. Theyre being programmed to think guns are bad. Its up to mom, dad, grandpa, etc to pass those traditions down.
Mike, I think you are on it.If cost was the reason, PRS and NRL matches that cost $250-300 to shoot wouldn't have 300 shooters and waiting lists to get in. They use $700 tripods for their range finder, $500 bipods, shoot factory ammo, scopes cost double to triple a common benchrest scope, fly to matches, stay three nights at hotels.
Short/mid range benchrest absolutely bores the younger guys to death. You can ask this question every week and no one will come up with an answer on what to do. It's the world we live in. These young guys make more money at 28-35 years old then we ever thought about making. They dont want to come listen to old men talk about their medical problems all day, or talk about how it used to be.