For any given chamber pressure, the 300 AAC BLACKOUT is capable of higher velocity.
Meaning, the 300 Whisper(R) cannot make 2280 fps with that bullet at the same OAL and pressure.
The dimensions of these two cartridges are nearly identical - the AAC is 7/10 of a MM longer on the neck which doesn't even matter as that space is consumed by the bullet in both chamberings. They have the same parent case, therefor the same maximum pressure abilities, and the body taper is nearly non-existent in both. Case capacity also seems to be nearly identical (25 vs 26) for the two. They're both close to each other and the AAC seems to be a way of getting around using the Whisper name - they changed it enough to call it their own. The difference between the two is splitting hairs and it's obvious what the AAC makers did.
Cite your sources for thinking that the 300 AAC is somehow able to do something the Whisper isn't with equal loading lengths. If you trim the necks of the AAC you've pretty much got Whisper brass. It's somehow less capable then? Come on now.
People buy off the shelf ammo for 308 and that does not need any forming. Less than 15% of shooters reload, but factory brass for 300 AAC BLACKOUT is coming out soon at a low price.
People buy .30-06 off the shelf that does not need any forming. What's the point of that statement? the AAC will still be a novelty cartridge, it'll never be as available as 223 or as cheap. Most people that shoot popular novelty cartridges reload it or shoot very little if they don't. That AAC brass could be used to make Whisper brass nearly as easy as range pick-up 223.