• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

6mm br shorten to 6mm ppc capacity

I can say, the first chamber I had cut, Dowling used a 22 PPC reamer held short with a .242 or 243"??? neck. That barrel had a shorter FB and I did polish the inside of the necks..... Tony Boyer style.

As you can see on the attached Walldog reamer print, I have an effective freebore of .0643", that helps keep the bullet out of the "old shoulder area" of the case neck and give a tiny bit more capacity.
With this reamer, I did have to go up in powder a touch to get the accuracy I was looking for, but that is not an issue at all.

CW
CW,
Very interesting. Yes my reamer was a very short throat. No way for us to avoid the stepped neck unfortunately. I always wondered how people were getting away with this, and I had the step from hell! Lol. Mystery solved. Nonetheless it is an amazing little cartridge, and was fun to whip up on the 6PPC guys every once in a while! Good times and very fond memories.
Paul
 
CW,
Very interesting. Yes my reamer was a very short throat. No way for us to avoid the stepped neck unfortunately. I always wondered how people were getting away with this, and I had the step from hell! Lol. Mystery solved. Nonetheless it is an amazing little cartridge, and was fun to whip up on the 6PPC guys every once in a while! Good times and very fond memories.
Paul
If you look at the talldog improved reamer print, the base of the bullet is nowhere near the old shoulder/neck junction. .013" neck wall thickness does not get buggered up nearly as much as .008" when it accidently hits the floor.

CW
 
If you look at the talldog improved reamer print, the base of the bullet is nowhere near the old shoulder/neck junction. .013" neck wall thickness does not get buggered up nearly as much as .008" when it accidently hits the floor.

CW
My .22Waldog was a .248 neck so it was quite challenging to id bore and od turn and end up with a loaded round of .246. You have about .003 to play with total! Fun stuff, but you had better be dialed in when you start cutting....
Paul
 
Was always curious about a shortened br case with a good .22 bullet on it with today’s propellants.
My all-time favorite .224 was (stole, "naming" concept from Dan Dowling) the 22 IdiotDog - a .200" short
22BR - every bit the equal of my John Ambler chambered 22 Waldogs. Making the chamber .200" short creates about .222 Remington capacity . . . making the brass takes some time, however, THAT is/was part of the "fun". o_O;) RG

P.S.: edited to correct myself incorrectly calling the (-).200" BR, "IdiotMag" - THAT is another story! I also made and used the 'BIG/TALL IdiotDog'. :p
 
Last edited:
My all-time favorite .224 was (stole, "naming" concept from Dan Dowling) the 22 IdiotMag - a .200" short
22BR - every bit the equal of my John Ambler chambered 22 Waldogs. Making the chamber .200" short creates about .222 Remington capacity . . . making the brass takes some time, however, THAT is/was part of the "fun". o_O;) RG
Randy,
in the Precision Shooting article I posted in one of the posts above, the writer was shooting a 20 Little Stubby. Which, according to the article, is a .195" short BR necked down. Your, 22 IdiotMag, is nearly identical in size. What chamber neck diameter did you go with? At 200 short, you might have .018 to .02" material to play with???? This is an awesome thread.

CW
 
Anybody know the difference in capacity of a 22 Waldog vs a 220 Beggs/Russian. Just wondering about pushing the shoulder, really more the neck/shoulder junction, back just a bit and then blowing the shoulder out to say 30°. Might be an easier way to get very close to a Waldog with less trouble. Most of these kinds of things have been tried already.
 
Randy,
in the Precision Shooting article I posted in one of the posts above, the writer was shooting a 20 Little Stubby. Which, according to the article, is a .195" short BR necked down. Your, 22 IdiotMag, is nearly identical in size. What chamber neck diameter did you go with? At 200 short, you might have .018 to .02" material to play with???? This is an awesome thread.

CW
Clay, the 22 IdiotDogs were made using my original .242" neck 22BR reamer - long ago, I went away from those THIN neck-walls (your post #42). I am going to chamber one soon, but will use my new JGS, .250" neck reamer. The IdiotMags shot so well, I intend to enjoy the nostalgia trip, albiet via THICKER neck-walls!:D

Since 1997, I have, "off & on", been messing with .220x30* Russian, but not as successfully as during, "the old days", with the 22IdiotDog . . . gotta, "eeny-meeny-miney-mo" between the two new barrels and get to cutting!;) RG

P.S. Wish I'd have caught on t' the neck thing sooner . . . I'd have a drawer full of more useful reamers - about Y2K, began paying attention to Hugh Henriksen and things got much better. :D

Edited to correct cartridge name: 22 IdiotDog.
 
Last edited:
Anybody know the difference in capacity of a 22 Waldog vs a 220 Beggs/Russian. Just wondering about pushing the shoulder, really more the neck/shoulder junction, back just a bit and then blowing the shoulder out to say 30°. Might be an easier way to get very close to a Waldog with less trouble. Most of these kinds of things have been tried already.
Beggs experimented with the Nk/shoulder radius and arrived at a more functional re-sizing experience. I originally opted for the .220x30* to have capacity ~equal to the (-).125" Waldog (short 22PPC): my second Waldog was 0.100" short of PPC. The [.220x30*] concept was to eliminate/reduce the fire-forming.

The down-side is that the tapered case body, even with a 30* shoulder, pretty much mimics .22/250 (or, any tapered case body cartridge) case length issues. With the Russianx30*,when FL/bump/Nk sizing, I must stay on top the case length.

Capacity wise, I expect that the Beggs version is the same ballpark, however, Gene worked out the "excessive" case lengthening - for that reason, I rate his version superior. ;)

The .220x30* capacity, as with the (-).100"Waldog is very close to .223 Rem., or, another of my OLD favorites, the .222&1/2: 28.0 Gr. of Win 748 and a 52/53 gr. bullet is usually pretty close to what a given barrel will "want". :D RG

P.S. Adding this to slow/stop hijacking Clay's thread - "believe-it-or-not", I will have nothing more to add.o_O
 
Last edited:
Beggs experimented with the Nk/shoulder radius and arrived at a more functional re-sizing experience. I originally opted for the .220x30* to have capacity ~equal to the (-).125" Waldog (short 22PPC): my second Waldog was 0.100" short of PPC. The concept was to eliminate/reduce the fire-forming. The down-side is that the tapered case body, even with a 30* shoulder, pretty much mimics .22/250 (or, any tapered case body cartridge) case length issues. With the Russianx30*,when FL/bump/Nk sizing, I must stay on top the case length.

Capacity wise, I expect that the Beggs version is the same ballpark, however, Gene worked out the "excessive" case lengthening - for that reason, I rate his version superior. ;)

The .220x30* capacity, as with the (-).100"Waldog is very close to .223 Rem., or, another of my OLD favorites, the .222&1/2: 28.0 Gr. of Win 748 and a 52/53 gr. bullet usually pretty close to what a given barrel will "want". :D RG

P.S. Adding this to slow/stop hijacking Clay's thread - "believe-it-or-not", I will have nothing more to add.o_O
Please continue to add to this thread!!!!!

BTW, @Larry Koch started this thread wanting to know more about a TallDog. Thanks Larry

CW
 
P.S. writer Dick Wright had some funny story's about his Talldog., shoot bugholes one day and not so much the next. Think he left a box up on the roof at Kelbys...lol
Speaking of Mr Kelby I remember seeing him placing high at one of the Super Shoots shooting a 22-45..... What is that? Some 222 variant?

Great thread.
 
P.S. writer Dick Wright had some funny story's about his Talldog., shoot bugholes one day and not so much the next. Think he left a box up on the roof at Kelbys...lol
Speaking of Mr Kelby I remember seeing him placing high at one of the Super Shoots shooting a 22-45..... What is that? Some 222 variant?

Great thread.
Dick shot mostly with a Lil' Dog which was the Br case shortened more than the Talldog and necked to 22 caliber.
 
Isn't ppc brass hard to get now? It's been mentioned several times " back when brass was hard to get"
This was before lapua made 220 russian, the brass available was pretty poor quality, hence the 262 nk, it took that much to clean it up. That was the 90s and people were selling ppc brass that would barely hold a primer for $1 each. Primers were less than a penny each then just for some refrence.
 
This was before lapua made 220 russian, the brass available was pretty poor quality, hence the 262 nk, it took that much to clean it up. That was the 90s and people were selling ppc brass that would barely hold a primer for $1 each. Primers were less than a penny each then just for some refrence.
I'm just a pup compared to some in the br game but I don't even remember a pre-220r ppc. Funny that I've never even thought about that because of the timeline of the ppc cartridge and I guess I just assumed, being a wildcat, P&P started with 220 brass. I learned something. It may have been clear to others but I just never knew this. Did they start with x39 brass or what? I've read the history, multiple times but still either forgot or never knew. Wiki says the 220 Russian is from 1961. That might be why I assumed it was the parent(Lapua) all along. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Beggs experimented with the Nk/shoulder radius and arrived at a more functional re-sizing experience. I originally opted for the .220x30* to have capacity ~equal to the (-).125" Waldog (short 22PPC): my second Waldog was 0.100" short of PPC. The [.220x30*] concept was to eliminate/reduce the fire-forming.

The down-side is that the tapered case body, even with a 30* shoulder, pretty much mimics .22/250 (or, any tapered case body cartridge) case length issues. With the Russianx30*,when FL/bump/Nk sizing, I must stay on top the case length.

Capacity wise, I expect that the Beggs version is the same ballpark, however, Gene worked out the "excessive" case lengthening - for that reason, I rate his version superior. ;)

The .220x30* capacity, as with the (-).100"Waldog is very close to .223 Rem., or, another of my OLD favorites, the .222&1/2: 28.0 Gr. of Win 748 and a 52/53 gr. bullet is usually pretty close to what a given barrel will "want". :D RG

P.S. Adding this to slow/stop hijacking Clay's thread - "believe-it-or-not", I will have nothing more to add.o_O
Shoulda known you had probably done it buddy. Seems like it should work and be pretty straightforward but sometimes things just don't meet the eye, too. I might have to give this a try! Straight up 220 Beggs is a shooter but I can't say that they don't still stretch a bit more than my straighter wall 30° stuff, like, well, several...ppc, Grendels and Br's. But the stretch is manageable, just gotta keep an eye on it is all. I'm sure some of that is my own doing as I was never able to get rid of bolt click entirely with either of Genes reamer designs so I went a thou larger at the base than his 2nd design. Really no way around it I guess. I'm moving more brass but it's only a thou and I don't have clickers. It just works.
 
Last edited:
I'm just a pup compared to some in the br game but I don't even remember a pre-220r ppc. Funny that I've never even thought about that because of the timeline of the ppc cartridge and I guess I just assumed, being a wildcat, P&P started with 220 brass. I learned something. It may have been clear to others but I just never knew this. Did they start with x39 brass or what? I've read the history, multiple times but still either forgot or never knew. Wiki says the 220 Russian is from 1961. That might be why I assumed it was the parent(Lapua) all along. Thank you.
Mike, i think lapua made the x39 version and sako made 220 russian back then but the quality of the brass was no where near present day lapua. Lapua started making 220 Russian later. I wouldn't bet the farm on this but i think it's accurate. I was shooting a 6br remington case in those days, the quality of those left a lot to be desired also, I still have the jig i made to drill the flash holes in the rem br brass. I couldn't afford to play this game back then but i dearly loved it so i scrimped and made as much of my stuff as i could just to shoot. This crap is addictive! Also i think the lapua brass was large primer pocket and the sako was small primer.
 
Last edited:
Mike, i think lapua made the x39 version and sako made 220 russian back then but the quality of the brass was no where near present day lapua. Lapua started making 220 Russian later. I wouldn't bet the farm on this but i think it's accurate. I was shooting a 6br remington case in those days, the quality of those left a lot to be desired also, I still have the jig i made to drill the flash holes in the rem br brass. I couldn't afford to play this game back then but i dearly loved it so i scrimped and made as much of my stuff as i could just to shoot. This crap is addictive!
I would not argue a bit either way. The last few years have been a whirlwind. Things are better but I think I lost what little mind I ever had. CRS is real. Lol!
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,057
Messages
2,226,825
Members
80,176
Latest member
toddmcfadden
Back
Top