• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

6BRA Alpha Brass question

That's nuts Bill. I have three different lots of Alpha 6 Dasher brass and each lot is a little better than the lot before. The third lot was so consistent out of the box, I shot them in a 600 yard IBS match and won the two gun without any prep except to turn the necks so I could safely chamber them. I tried it again the following match and won that one also...... no fireforming, no prep, except to turn necks.
I am puzzled why some chamberings are getting so much negative press and others rave reviews?
My only experience is with the dasher brass.
CW
Your lucky I'm happy for you.
I bought a box of dasher for the wife's dasher, used it for barrel break in. Then trashed it.
 
I wonder what die works with an Alpha reamer chamber? I see Alpha markets the Micron die from Bullet Central on their website. I understand Bullet Central used a Wheeler chamber design for the die dimensions. I wonder if the Alpha marketed Micron die reflects Alpha brass/chamber design??
 
Don't have any help for the 6BRA alpha brass ...but it fits perfectly in my 6 dasher. I purchased my own reamer and chambered it .272" neck, no turn.
The loaded round runs .2695" with a little variance.
And a .267" bushing all work together...as just right. Don't have any issues with heavy bolt lift, or brass through the first 400 pcs. Primer pockets were a little tight...solved with Remington 71/2 primer. I have run these cases hard, to see what was possible with different powders. Accuracy is pretty standard Varget and RL15...RL 15 the slight edge. Velocity is 6.5 Stabal 107 gr SMK 3132 fps.
110 SMK 3085 fps, 115 DTAC 3020 fps. The Alpha brass handled it all with no pressure signs or hard bolt lift...bolt lift was normal and easy.
Unless something is different with the 6 BRA brass it's strange to hear about all the problems.
This won't help you with problems Alpha is doing something right with respect to the 6 Dasher brass...at least the 400 I purchased. Just my experience with it so far....Will see what the future brings, brass problem, chambering problem, a miss match. A chamber cast of the rifles chamber may be in order, to compare with the brass you have.
 
Alex alluded to the issue with his response after he talked with Alpha.

The issue as I understand it has to do with the 200 line. The Wheeler BRA reamer has a 200 line diameter of 0.4714. JGS reamers are +0.0005. So in theory you could have a reamer that measures 0.4719 at the 200 line. You then stack another half to full thousandth of an inch after chambering due to cutting fluid and polishing and you could have a 200 line that could be 0.4729.

Alpha has stated that 0.471 at the 200 line is max. So with their (Alpha’s) OCD head brass once your chamber is over 0.471 at the 200 line the brass will not expand enough to grip the chamber at the base of the case. This is what is causing the case to thrust against the bolt.

With the Dasher I believe the 200 line on the reamer print is 0.4707. So with the explanation above this will end up being closer to the stated by Alpha max of 0.471. That may be why people are having positive results with the Dasher and not experiencing the same issues as described by BRA users.

Hopefully this helps make sense of what is happening and why.

The only way I see to correct the issue if you want to use Alpha brass is to have a reamer ground with smaller measurements. But if you choose to do this you will also need a new sizing die to support your new measurement.
 
Many people including me use chambers with .4714-.4715 diameters at the .200 line on all BR variants to stop clickers without having to use small base dies, ring dies, Harrels #4, etc. To make brass that won’t work in the chamber design created by the person that popularized it with published reamer prints everywhere is just hard to imagine. I have a BRA build just starting now. Alpha brass was already purchased that I will have to sell. I am glad I saw this before I wasted any components and spent weeks scratching my head. Back to Lapua.
I am curious, based on first hand experience, what the .200 line diameters were on reamers that produced clickers when using non-Alpha brand brass in a BR or BRA chamber, and what was the minimum diameter number necessary to eliminate such?
 
Yes. That was my advice. Call it something else. Put it on the description it wont work in BRA chambers.
Trust me, Im willing to work with anyone to bring better stuff to our game. I have done a lot of that work. I dont get paid. I just like to see groups get smaller. But when it hurts me because I recomended something that ends up not working it makes me very hesitant going forward.
Sad have 300 neck turned for gun. Never again
 
This CIP link is what the 6BRA cartridge/chamber was based off.
I'm going to say one last thing on this topic and Im done. I was involved in the preproduction testing. We were sent brass. It WAS based on my chamber. I was there. The Alpha guys were very interested in making the best stuff. Now when problems came up I heard many possible causes. I have only heard it was based on the cip chamber recently. Now, at the time of this brass coming out, there was no cip BRA chamber. Anyhow, tightening up the base may just be the way to make this brass work. But if it was originally not supposed to work in the BRA chambers we all had when the brass was designed, it was a big secret from all of us. And now its my chambers fault?
 
I'm going to say one last thing on this topic and Im done. I was involved in the preproduction testing. We were sent brass. It WAS based on my chamber. I was there. The Alpha guys were very interested in making the best stuff. Now when problems came up I heard many possible causes. I have only heard it was based on the cip chamber recently. Now, at the time of this brass coming out, there was no cip BRA chamber. Anyhow, tightening up the base may just be the way to make this brass work. But if it was originally not supposed to work in the BRA chambers we all had when the brass was designed, it was a big secret from all of us. And now its my chambers fault?
Obviously it’s not your fault or a problem with your well proven chamber. The first batch of brass worked for you and everyone else that bought and used it based on your recommendation.

They changed the brass and did not tell you or anyone. Short and simple. This problem should have been made public as soon as it was discovered. It would have saved a bunch of us time, money and aggravation.
 
Obviously

They changed the brass and did not tell you or anyone. Short and simple. This problem should have been made public as soon as it was discovered. It would have saved a bunch of us time, money and aggravation.
I had both of my 6BRA s rechambered to 6BR. Not in the know ;[
 
I just read through the entire thread and I think I may be having some similar problems as others? I didn’t check the base to shoulder measurement on the new Alpha OCD brass (what is it supposed to be?), but the new brass is difficult to close the bolt on (Alpha reamer w/ .120 FB done by a great ‘smith). I chose a starting load of 30.5gr N150 (w/ Berger 108’s) b/c I have quite a bit of it and have read positive things from guys using 150. Straight away I was getting ejector swipes at 2850-2870fps. Also after a handful of rounds I start seeing lots of tiny brass particles in the chamber and on my bolt.

On the 1x fired stuff I bump the shoulders a thou and they chamber much easier (Micron die), like any other round. Velocity topped out around 2950 with 31.4g N150 (heavy bolt lift, swipes of course). Settled on 30.8 which gave me about 3/8” elevation at 200yd, but it’s only running 2900fps. I haven’t shot enough of the sized brass to know if I’ll still get the brass flakes in the chamber, but I assume the swipes at the lower velocities are from the brass being too hard/undersized at the .200 line and not grabbing the chamber? Not sure why it’s so hard to close the bolt on out of the box when using Alpha’s own reamer (brass prep for virgin stuff is mandrel the neck, trim/chamfer/debur). Anyways, appreciate all the input and info everyone has already posted.
 
I just read through the entire thread and I think I may be having some similar problems as others? I didn’t check the base to shoulder measurement on the new Alpha OCD brass (what is it supposed to be?), but the new brass is difficult to close the bolt on (Alpha reamer w/ .120 FB done by a great ‘smith). I chose a starting load of 30.5gr N150 (w/ Berger 108’s) b/c I have quite a bit of it and have read positive things from guys using 150. Straight away I was getting ejector swipes at 2850-2870fps. Also after a handful of rounds I start seeing lots of tiny brass particles in the chamber and on my bolt.

On the 1x fired stuff I bump the shoulders a thou and they chamber much easier (Micron die), like any other round. Velocity topped out around 2950 with 31.4g N150 (heavy bolt lift, swipes of course). Settled on 30.8 which gave me about 3/8” elevation at 200yd, but it’s only running 2900fps. I haven’t shot enough of the sized brass to know if I’ll still get the brass flakes in the chamber, but I assume the swipes at the lower velocities are from the brass being too hard/undersized at the .200 line and not grabbing the chamber? Not sure why it’s so hard to close the bolt on out of the box when using Alpha’s own reamer (brass prep for virgin stuff is mandrel the neck, trim/chamfer/debur). Anyways, appreciate all the input and info everyone has already posted.
So you are using Alpha OCD brass in a rifle chambered with the Alpha reamer and using a Micron Die.

You have heavy bolt lift / clickers when opening your bolt?
 
Last edited:
So you are using Alpha OCD brass in a rifle chambered with the Alpha reamer and using a Micron Die.

You have heavy bolt lift / clickers when opening your bolt?
On the virgin brass I have a hard time closing the bolt compared to stuff that’s 1x fired and sized. Bolt lift is heavy on anything past 2900fps with the new brass as well

Edit: what are clickers? I’ve seen that mentioned a bunch but am not familiar
 
i just picked up a 6BRA, the Alpha brass that the fella gave me some of the fired brass had pierced primers in them.. some flow to the ejector.. measured at the web .469. I think that there is six cases like that.. bothers me that after the first one he didn't stop and shot the others anyway.. geezleweez!
Necks on fired brass brass was at .271. There were a few that were primed but not shot, virgin.. neck unturned.. measured at the web was .466. and necks are at .266
The sizing die is a Harrell's, marked 2.5, set the die to bump the shoulder back .0025, but the shell holder was not touching the bottom of the die.. if it did, it pushed the shoulder back 10K. There was some fired brass in the bunch that only measured .467 at the web and the necks were sized to .2655.
The brass that was sized and had the .467 web stayed there at that number and the bolt on the action closed without issue..
The brass with pierced primers.. web stretched .003 is trash and will go in the brass bin.
 
Alpha is thinking that my issues were due to the reamer dimension not being to CIP specifications at the base of the chamber. Basically the OCD brass isn't growing to the chamber and its slamming into the bolt face.
Same thing they r telling me right now wat did you ever figure out
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,844
Messages
2,204,300
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top