• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

6BR vrs 6PPC

There were have been all kind of changes tried to the BR case attempting to make it more competitive to the ppc. Search for waldog or talldog I believe was one
They were driven by 220 Russian brass shortage if I remember right. No reason to do this unless you just want to. Then that’s reason enough
The 22 Waldog was a .125 shortened PPC.
 
Some people (like me) just like to swim upstream. I'd rather lose shooting something different than win with the same old piece du jour. I hope I'm not alone......what's the point otherwise?
~Gary
Gary,

You’re certainly are not alone! There are plenty of folks who enjoy tinkering and experimenting! They just have to be different! That’s great! Really it comes down to how a person is geared!

But that’s not me! I’m a competitor first and foremost! When I go to a match I give it everything I have. I want to give myself the best possible chance of doing well. That means the best possible equipment and components that I can get my hands on! If I do well, great! If not, that’s ok to! It just means I’ve got to go home and fix/figure out what happened and work harder!

If I’m experimenting its because I’m looking for a competitive edge or advantage (I have done plenty of experimenting). I’m trying to improve on what I have! I have no desire to be different for the sake Of being different! But to each his own!

Bart
 
Last edited:
Back when Ferris Pindell was trying to make the 81's competitive, the .900 length jackets were problematic. High quality jackets on this long jacket were not concentric enough to win matches. A friend bought 240,000 jackets of .900 in length and ended up wasting time and money trying to win with them. The .825 jacket was very good, but there were problems in manufacturing the longer .900 jacket. He offered the me the whole lot for $24 per thousand, I had no need for them. He could not give the jackets away, 10 years later.

Jacket quality WAS a major issue.

I had a set of dies made for a 75g low drag BT bullet based on the .900 length jacket, what a disappointment. Gene Harwood was also neck deep in the .900 jacket issues as it had been a major stumbling block for a long time.

Gene designed a next generation of low drag which was a 6mm 85g low drag BT on a jacket longer than .900,
J4 had no interest. After Gene died, I sent the bullets to Sierra begging them to consider making them.

So, the issue of jacket uniformity and larger than PPC cases to push those longer bullets are another can of worms. Bart could probably comment on this issue, IF there is an issue today.

Quality .900 jackets are out there but Availability can be an issue. The .900 is what I make my 80 gr Dominators on!

Bart
 
Back when Ferris Pindell was trying to make the 81's competitive, the .900 length jackets were problematic. High quality jackets on this long jacket were not concentric enough to win matches. A friend bought 240,000 jackets of .900 in length and ended up wasting time and money trying to win with them. The .825 jacket was very good, but there were problems in manufacturing the longer .900 jacket. He offered the me the whole lot for $24 per thousand, I had no need for them. He could not give the jackets away, 10 years later.

Jacket quality WAS a major issue.

I had a set of dies made for a 75g low drag BT bullet based on the .900 length jacket, what a disappointment. Gene Harwood was also neck deep in the .900 jacket issues as it had been a major stumbling block for a long time.

Gene designed a next generation of low drag which was a 6mm 85g low drag BT on a jacket longer than .900,
J4 had no interest. After Gene died, I sent the bullets to Sierra begging them to consider making them.

So, the issue of jacket uniformity and larger than PPC cases to push those longer bullets are another can of worms. Bart could probably comment on this issue, IF there is an issue today.
The old adage about good bullets and barrels is true. No case can win without both, consistently. Apparently, the quality issues are resolved and bullets in the weight class that are suitable for them are becoming more popular, as more and more people are shooting the 80 class bullets in something...be it a ppc, grendel, br or something else.
 
Gary,

You’re certainly are not alone! There are plenty of folks who enjoy tinkering and experimenting! They just have to be different! That’s great! Really it comes down to how a person is geared!

But that’s not me! I’m a competitor first and foremost! When I go to a match I give it everything I have. I want to give myself the best possible chance of doing well. That means the best possible equipment and components that I can get my hands! If I do well, great! If not, that’s ok to! It just means I’ve got to go home and fix/figure out what happened and work harder!

If I’m experimenting its because I’m looking for a competitive edge or advantage (I have done plenty of experimenting). I’m trying to improve on what I have! I have no desire to be different for the sake Of being different! But to each his own!

Bart
Then we are experimenting for the same reasons Bart. I do enjoy trying new things but I don't like to spend much time on things that don't work. I'm sticking with the 6 Grendel for now. I'll do a lot more testing over the winter but mainly just to try to get everything from it that I can. The big work, if you want to call it that is done. All that's left is to continue to better learn the cartridge's nuances, IMO.
 
Gentleman you are getting into a “pithing” contest and don’t need to! My question is basically what can be done to make the BR more SHORT range competitive vrs the PPC. Is it reasonable to even try to change it. I’m not a competitor nor will I ever be. Both cartridges have their shooting niche,BUT the cases are very close to each other and different head sizes. I’ve just wondered could the BR be converted into a better short range cartridge OR .... ?
 
Gentleman you are getting into a “pithing” contest and don’t need to! My question is basically what can be done to make the BR more SHORT range competitive vrs the PPC. Is it reasonable to even try to change it. I’m not a competitor nor will I ever be. Both cartridges have their shooting niche,BUT the cases are very close to each other and different head sizes. I’ve just wondered could the BR be converted into a better short range cartridge OR .... ?

We forgot all about you! Here's a couple of questions. What type of competition will you be shooting? Group or score? How much can your gun weight?
 
Gentleman you are getting into a “pithing” contest and don’t need to! My question is basically what can be done to make the BR more SHORT range competitive vrs the PPC. Is it reasonable to even try to change it. I’m not a competitor nor will I ever be. Both cartridges have their shooting niche,BUT the cases are very close to each other and different head sizes. I’ve just wondered could the BR be converted into a better short range cartridge OR .... ?
Google a 6 TALL dog, not a waldog. And if you aren't competing, NO, it's not worth it imho.
 
I agree with Mike! For short range 100-300 you can optimize the 6BR with a 12 twist barrel and 80 gr bullets. Otherwise stick to the 6ppc.
Actually, I was thinking along the lines of shortening the case and changing shoulder angle, etc but yes, I agree with Bart, changing bullet weight, length, bearing surface and powders is also optimizing a cartridge. :)
 
Bart , you’re forgetting that I’m not nor will I ever be a competitor. I’m just curious because I’ve got rifles with that boltface and want to shoot short range ,1-300 yds. without changing the boltface . Someone else besides Mike has suggested the Talldog which might be a possibility or just a BR set up to shoot your 80-90 grn. bullet .
 
Bart , you’re forgetting that I’m not nor will I ever be a competitor. I’m just curious because I’ve got rifles with that boltface and want to shoot short range ,1-300 yds. without changing the boltface . Someone else besides Mike has suggested the Talldog which might be a possibility or just a BR set up to shoot your 80-90 grn. bullet .
Mike and I both gave you a pretty good answer above!

Bart
 
I agree gentlemen and you gentlemen have forgotten more than I’ll ever know! I think your bullets in a 12 twist BR or Talldog is the way to go.I’m now wondering who would have a suitable Talldog reemer and dies OR for a guy like me just keep it simple stupid and go with the BR . I don’t mind the challenge of the Talldog though !
 
I agree with Mike! For short range 100-300 you can optimize the 6BR with a 12 twist barrel and 80 gr bullets. Otherwise stick to the 6ppc.
If the bullet weight were pushed to say 90-95 grs would one be better off with a 10 twist or stay with the 12 twist. TKS
 
Gary,

You’re certainly are not alone! There are plenty of folks who enjoy tinkering and experimenting! They just have to be different! That’s great! Really it comes down to how a person is geared!

But that’s not me! I’m a competitor first and foremost! When I go to a match I give it everything I have. I want to give myself the best possible chance of doing well. That means the best possible equipment and components that I can get my hands on! If I do well, great! If not, that’s ok to! It just means I’ve got to go home and fix/figure out what happened and work harder!

If I’m experimenting its because I’m looking for a competitive edge or advantage (I have done plenty of experimenting). I’m trying to improve on what I have! I have no desire to be different for the sake Of being different! But to each his own!

Bart
Gary,

You’re certainly are not alone! There are plenty of folks who enjoy tinkering and experimenting! They just have to be different! That’s great! Really it comes down to how a person is geared!..........
Well, right now I'm talking the talk, but not walking the walk, so to speak. I'm doing 6BR, BRA, Dasher, and XC. Couldn't be more conformist if I tried. I've never shot a PPC, but if I were to take up SR BR at this point, I'm to old/tired/lazy to swim up that stream, and do anything else. I've sold my big lathe and mill and am kind of winding down. Not much "tinkering and experimenting" now.
~Gary
 
I agree gentlemen and you gentlemen have forgotten more than I’ll ever know! I think your bullets in a 12 twist BR or Talldog is the way to go.I’m now wondering who would have a suitable Talldog reemer and dies OR for a guy like me just keep it simple stupid and go with the BR . I don’t mind the challenge of the Talldog though !

Most of the competition(s) that I shoot are 100,200, & 300yds or some combination thereof. Three years ago we began experimenting with the 12tw 6br and using 80gr bullets in those competitions. And to summarize the whole thing in a nutshell, Bart hit the nail on the head in post #47 above. The 12tw BR with 80's is what I think you're looking for. That said, I would also add the BRA with a 12Twist and 80's to that list. There are several really great 80gr bullets out there and Barts Dominators are for sure a top consideration.

And to muddy the water a bit there's an awful lot to like about the 12TW 6 Grendel too, I've been quite impressed with it.

We have several PPC's that we shoot so we're able to make a direct comparison of the 3 on any given day, and for what you state that your objective is.... 6br with a 12Tw and 80's is what I'd recommend especially since you're talking 300yds. JME. WD
 
Currently in UBR 300yd records for factory & modified class are held by 6BR with 68gr bullets --custom & unlimited are held by 6ppc with 68gr bullets- there are some exceptional 6bra's shooting 80 & 87 that will have a good chance of breaking these records
JR
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,769
Messages
2,224,023
Members
79,848
Latest member
Rugersdad
Back
Top