dmoran: Not one barrel, but two, both Kriegers. One was a sub performer when chambered in 6BRX, was used for fire-forming. When the other barrel was pulled off & I got out of the 6BRX "business", the fire-forming barrel was setback & rechambered to 6BR. It now shoots right alongside my other 6BR's & I would not hesitate to use it in a match, so at least with that barrel, nothing wrong with it.
I have and use my borescope all the time & closely monitor the throat (and the entire bore) for copper & more importantly, carbon buildup. It is kept under control with applications of JB, as required.
For me the combination of (1) less accuracy than my 6BR's, (2) earlier fire-cracking than the 6BR's, (3) very short case life compared to the 6BR's, (4), the work involved in fire-forming, (5) the 1/10" shorter case neck length, (6) and finally, the fact that I just do not "need" the added performance of an "improved" cartridge for my range availability limitations of 600 yards maximum, all came together to put an end to my 6BRX chamberings. The time proven 6BR's do everything I need them to do.
Forgot to mention: Used one of my switch-barrels, pulled off the 6BR barrel & had the first 6BRX installed. Immediately began blanking primers. There seems to be some question on the proper term, but the primers (CCIBR4 & 450's) had clean holes punched out of the center of the primers. Never had that problem when the rifle was a 6BR. Had to send the bolt to Gre-Tan to have the firing pin bushed. Solved that problem. Then the primer pockets started opening up. All signs of high pressure. Guess I could have reduced the powder charge (33 grs. of Varget w/ 105 Bergers was the standard load), but what's the point of a BRX if the ballistics are the same or close to a 6BR?
Just my experience with an "improved" cartridge, for me, not a good one.
A long winded, rambling posting, I know, so will be quiet now. Sorry. :-[