This seems like reasonable advice.H110/W296 work in 300BO for both supersonic and subsonic. It performs best at higher case fill. For 300BO subsonic loads the 200gr-220gr bullets are seated deep into the case, which effectively decreases the case volume As a result a +9gr H110 charge is approaching full case fill on the available/reduced case capacity in subsonic loads.
With the Grendel the 147gr bullet will be mostly seated in neck and outside of case so there will be a lot of empty space inside the case body. A faster burning powder will do better handling the excess space while still having consistent ignition without being affected by inconsistent powder distribution. You might consider using Titegroup or Bullseye, or even something like Accurate #9.
Well that didn't work. Had to use the cleaning rod to push these out of the barrel (not at the same time). Will up the charge to 6gr and 7gr.
How far down the barrel did it go?
That’s the route I took with my 338 arc.A piece of advise given to me by an old school reloader was that when developing a subsonic load without credit source of reloading data:
It is far worse to get a bullet stuck in the barrel then it is for the bullet to break the sound barrier. Pushing a stuck bullet out of a barrel can be a PITA. Easier to make certain that the bullet clears the barrel (higher charge weight), and then gradually reduce the powder volume until it drops down to your desired velocity.
In 300BO the charge weight to optimize a for subsonic in 8” barrel is different than charge weight for 18” barrel. The additional barrel length results in increased friction/drag on bullet which slows it down. Most subsonic recommendations assume 8”-16” barrel length. This could be an issue for longer barrels, and may require a slightly higher powder charge to ensure it safely clears your firearm. Always bring a cleaning rod![]()
