This afternoon I hauled the .45-70 1895 Marlin, a mess of one gallon milk jugs a chronograph and some ammo to the range. A couple of friends were with me and we had a blast. Here's the numbers & photos:
350 gr Hornady FNSP, 50 gr H4198, RP case, CCI 200 primer. MV today was 2086 fps.
Results: bullet recovered in 6th jug. Retained wt 296 grains, .846" diameter
350 gr Swift A-Frame, 50 gr H4198, RP case, CCI 200 primer. MV = 2046 fps.
Results: bullet recovered in 7th jug. Retained wt 345 grains, .710" diameter
Swift and Hornady bullets
Swift and Hornady bullets, fired and unfired.
To me it's obvious that the Hornady expands more and sheds more weight. The Hornady would be my choice for deer, and likely for most game. It has been my standard hunting load for several years. I was very impressed with the performance of the Swift however. It's an expensive bullet, and apparently a friend and I got what we paid for. Excellent weight retention. Magazine photo perfect mushroom and good expanded diameter. Was a bit surprised that it only penetrated into the 7th water-filled jug.
Ten jugs were lined up on a bench at 20 yards for the test.
More tests to follow as time permits. Regards, Guy
350 gr Hornady FNSP, 50 gr H4198, RP case, CCI 200 primer. MV today was 2086 fps.
Results: bullet recovered in 6th jug. Retained wt 296 grains, .846" diameter
350 gr Swift A-Frame, 50 gr H4198, RP case, CCI 200 primer. MV = 2046 fps.
Results: bullet recovered in 7th jug. Retained wt 345 grains, .710" diameter

Swift and Hornady bullets

Swift and Hornady bullets, fired and unfired.
To me it's obvious that the Hornady expands more and sheds more weight. The Hornady would be my choice for deer, and likely for most game. It has been my standard hunting load for several years. I was very impressed with the performance of the Swift however. It's an expensive bullet, and apparently a friend and I got what we paid for. Excellent weight retention. Magazine photo perfect mushroom and good expanded diameter. Was a bit surprised that it only penetrated into the 7th water-filled jug.
Ten jugs were lined up on a bench at 20 yards for the test.
More tests to follow as time permits. Regards, Guy