A good gun and brake will shoot under 1/2 inch at 200. I have had some shoot under 3/4 at 400. BR guys cant afford to let anything on the table. The test that was done even showed a PPC lost accuracy. Don't know about your suppressed gun but a brake works by gases hitting a wall and redirecting them. The more walled baffles the better they work. Look at a clamshell and see them baffles. The tests were done, look them up. MattLol plenty happy with that with factory ammo. Got "wrong hole" brake loads shooting under an inch at 300.
A good gun and brake will shoot under 1/2 inch at 200. I have had some shoot umder 3/4 at 400. BR guys cant afford to let anything on the table. The test that was done even showed a PPC lost accuracy. Don't know about your suppressed gun but a brake works by gases hitting a wall and redirecting them. The more walled baffles the better they work. Look at a clamshell and see them baffles. The tests were done, look them up. Matt
A can and and a brake are not the same. The internals and workings are totally different. I have already put 10 shots in 1/4 MOA at 1000 on paper and officially measured. Many times close to that. We shoot 10 shot groups because 5 is a lot easier to get lucky. I would like to see your groups on paper and officially measured. MattMatt I don't shoot benchrest. If you think you need a perfect brake that is exactly .020" over bore then go for it. I know that it isn't needed for my shooting and staying 1/2 MOA to 1000 yards and past. Same with using my .338 can on my smaller calibers. Still very accurate.
I almost didn't put that pic up because I knew I would get these comments but figured what the hell.
A flash suppresser and a muzzle brake are two different animals. They work entirely different and serve a different purpose. An M14 and a custom bench gun are also two different animals. MattMilitary teams shooting their new M14NM rifles saw accuracy problems shooting in the rain. They reamed out the flash suppressors. Good accuracy in downpours thereafter.
An M14 and a custom bench gun are also two different animals. Matt
My point is tests have proven different hole sizes changes groups. I have read various test results from various muzzle brake builders. Almost all say the same thing. For a brake to work efficiently it must have the gas hit the walls. If the walls are farther away from the bullet, it works less effecient on recoil reduction. This is an accuracy site (6MM BR). I stand by my post that a bigger hole loses accuracy. Just like some designs do also.That is what I was trying to get across to you above when you kept speaking of benchrest and talking down my rifle and group as it was due to the brake. My rifle isn't a short barreled, full taper contour barrel, no mag action, large flat bottomed super stiff bedded stock, 60x scope and shooting off a large micrometer front rest with bags holding it rock solid in place. It's not shooting ammo that has had the bullet weight and length sorted, brass weight and internal capacity sorted and super anally prepped, weighed primers etc that BR ammo is. It was shooting factory ammo, actually shots 56-60 out of a new 28" med palma contour barrel, magazine fed action in an aluminum mini chassis stock and a 4.5-27x scope on 20x shot from prone off a bipod with a hand held poly pellet filled sock in the rear but you seem to take out of this that it's not a one hole group because it's a .30 brake on a 6mm. Different games and equipment give different performance and require different performance.That was my point.
This is the rifle that shot the group above. Not a benchrest rifle.not built to shoot sub .1 MOA sized groups but to be easily sub 1/2 MOA with factory ammo and it does that well.
![]()
![]()
I hold my rifle, a 300 WSM really pushes you. MattHave a .338 caliber APA Fat Bastard brake on my .30-338 Norma Improved. The slightly larger diameter doesn't seem to hinder accuracy much...
![]()
Not a BR shooter, either...I like to actually hold my rifles when I shoot 'em![]()