IME, it's a coin toss, with any difference getting lost in the noise. This seems to be confirmed by various ballistics programs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They will if it keeps dying. MattThat's why I specifically said SR IBS score. Let's face it, your not going to change anybody's mind in the IBS to use neutral targets. It ain't gonna happen, you know it, I know it and everybody who associated with the IBS knows it. I have no doubt that some 6MM cartridges are better at long distances. As long as they keep those targets that are in use now for IBS short range score, 95% of the time a guy with a 30 is going to win.
Jim, I certainly see your logic but show up at a score match with a .370 load/rifle and I can pretty much guarantee you'll finish dead last.yes the 30 is accurate but the real reason is the diameter. A 100 yd score target the 10 ring is .500 plus .308 =.808, you get a 10. 308 plus .062 = .370 you get an X. Now when you hit 300 yds. the wind enters the picture and most of the time they can't shoot a 250. Run the numbers on a 105 6mm. bullet and a 112 to 118 30 cal and you will find that the plain old 6br with a 105 will come out on top with equal quality bullets and barrels. There argument is, it's about x's...... right at a 100 you take a sub .1 gun and shoot at a 1/2" 10 ring then it is about x's, but when the wind blows at longer distance it is a different story at 2-300 yds. the higher BC. 6 mm will hold it's own. Look at the groups they are shooting at 600 yds. and they can't go back to the sighter. ..... and don't have field full of flags....... jim
I will say this a bullet that moves half as much in the wind has the advantage.
The wind has more affect on the out come at longer range than anything. Maybe it is just how long range shooters load is what makes them shoot in .3 at 600 yds but are not capable shooting in an inch and a half at 300
....... but they can shoot in an inch and a half at 1000
....... i would guess that loading for longer ranges is a little more precise..... I found that out a long time ago....... jim
I very much agree that bc is a bigger factor as distance increases. I also agree with Toby, in that in SR we have a more precise read on the wind and unless caught in a big switch, the difference of BC is minimized.I will say this a bullet that moves half as much in the wind has the advantage. The wind has more affect on the out come at longer range than anything. Maybe it is just how long range shooters load is what makes them shoot in .3 at 600 yds but are not capable shooting in an inch and a half at 300....... but they can shoot in an inch and a half at 1000....... i would guess that loading for longer ranges is a little more precise..... I found that out a long time ago....... jim
Ok, 3" aggs at 1000.. so what would that be at 300???. How many short range guys weigh powder to the .01? How many measure and trim and point bullets? how many anneal? how many separate by seating pressure ? how many weigh primers? Loading for short range is very crude and they will jump in and say it isn't needed. How do they know if they don't try some of these things. jim
Then you don't know anything about the IBS. You have a better chance of doing Pam Anderson than getting the IBS to change anything.They will if it keeps dying. Matt
A 10fps ES creates 0.1" of vertical (0.033 MOA) for a 6PPC at 300 yards, but >3" of vertical (0.33 MOA) for a Dasher at 1000 yards.
For SR, keeping up with tune from match to match is more important that loading practices designed to minimize ES.
Then you don't know anything about the IBS. You have a better chance of doing Pam Anderson than getting the IBS to change anything.
Then you don't know anything about the IBS. You have a better chance of doing Pam Anderson than getting the IBS to change anything.
With their past history of changing things being a prime example of, "If it aint broke, fix it until it is", behind them, the IBS has nearly accomplished killing a great sport. Overall attendance has been down for the last several years. The 6 power classes are nearly dead and will soon be completely gone.
You hit it right on the head Eddie.With their past history of changing things being a prime example of, "If it aint broke, fix it until it is", behind them, the IBS has nearly accomplished killing a great sport. Overall attendance has been down for the last several years. The 6 power classes are nearly dead and will soon be completely gone.
I see you have no clue what I'm talking about, Short range shooter hold more precisely for wind? if so how can you miss an 1.5" 10 ring at 300 yds? You have more flags out in one match than 1000 yd. shooters have in all the matches put together in a year. As far as bullets Spencer made some of the finest long range bullets made. I see this is a waste of time ....... jim
Are you referring to this match? :http://internationalbenchrest.com/results/score/2015/Ashe County/Nationals/AsheCountyNationals.phpTo the original post, the BC on the 30 cal is a little bit better than the 6 at those weights.
For the rest of this thread, the 2015 IBS 300 yard national was won by a 6 dasher. In fact, 3 of the top ten that year at that match ran a 6 dasher for the 300 agg. Their were others that also shot a 6 of some type, dasher, br, brdx and brx, but not a single ppc. Again you won't find this on the equipment list, but many IBS shooters are bringing a 6mm variant to the line in the 300 yard matches. I think it has the advantage in windy conditions, but I tend to lose the bullet holes when the mirage gets bad, so each person will believe differently on the subject based on personal experience.
Are you referring to this match? :http://internationalbenchrest.com/results/score/2015/Ashe County/Nationals/AsheCountyNationals.php
I don't know which 3 of the top 10 it was but I can name most of the ones that it wasn't.
