• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

184 Hybrid results

Did you do any load development? I am thinking of doing nothing but changing Bullets.
Richard I did a full work up. I think you will find you might need a little bit more power to get your speeds. Or at least I did.
 
Here are the results, observations and takeaways from a 3x1,000 match 8/3/19.
First, a little background on the rifle system and how I arrived at this point. The barrel is a Bartlein 5R in 8.25 twist. It is a med. Palma contour finished at 32". I'm a sling shooter and the scope on the rifle is a 10-60 March.
All sizing was done on a Co-Ax press with a custom Whidden die. Bullet seating was accomplished via and arbor die cut with my chamber reamer. Powder weight was measured with an A&D FX 120i with auto trickler.
It has been shooting the 183 SMKs' very well and since I won 400 of the Hybrids at the BSWN, I thought I'd give them as close to a heads-to-head test that I could. I need to preface the following load data by saying that A. I moly coat all my bullets, and B. these loads are safe in MY rifle. Please use good sense in trying them.
My "go to" load is 56.5 gr. of RL-23, Tula LR-M primer and the SMK's seated .015" off.
I took that exact loadwith the 184's and played with the seating depth from a .015 jam to .040" off. It was no surprise to find that the hybrids while being very tolerant of seating depth, preferred being jumped .010".
Whether by luck or design, the two bullets B2O measurement are with-in .003" of each other. Basically, the two are interchangeable in my rifle without moving the seating die adjustment.
I quickly settled on a load that was running 2,950 fps. with and ES of 4.
Range conditions were p. sunny with mirage and very light and switching wind building throughout the day. By the 3rd match, mirage was becoming a serious problem, and even dialing down the scope only helped, but didn't solve the problem. I think it was the cause of more vertical on target, as opposed to match two.
My 1st match was a wash as the ShotMarker target I was on, had the wrong target size selected. The target owner had only recently received the unit, and was just learning it. Oooops!
I have posted pics of both the target and the stat box for matches two and three. For a load that was un-tested at 1K, I was happy with both the vertical and the SD of the load.
Conclusion:The hybrids shot virtually the same come-up as the 183"s, however, my "X" count was lower that the Sierras being shot in similar conditions. I found that the Hybrids had a little more B2O variance as well as OAL variance as compared to the Sierras, but I trim/point ALL bullets being shot at 1K, so that is a moot point.
All in all, I think the Hybrid bullets with a little more fine tuning in the seating dept. are capable of much better results than I had yesterday, shrinking the vertical considerably.
I hope this helps,

Lloyd

berger1.jpg berger2.jpg berger3.jpg berger4.jpg
 
I’ve had great luck with the 184s . Fired 800 or so .... As Lloyd stated come ups are very similar to Sierra 183 which I used for 2-3 seasons in f class . Running 235 fb and 1-8.5 twist , 15 jump . Running straight 284 with 4350 @ 2790 in 30” barrel . Shehane with 4831sc @ 2890-2900 with 32” . Lot that I have sorted pretty good .
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
170,273
Messages
2,290,199
Members
82,630
Latest member
Gunner9330
Back
Top