Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was quoting the guy that had varget and ball powder mixed. It works very well to get ball powder out of extruded powder. People screw up at times at home and sometimes you don't have to throw something away if you can fix it.So you have seen this possible contamination on numerous occasions?
Mmmyeah...maybe 30 years ago I saw an article somewhere about people sieving W-W 748 into coarse, medium, and fine particle size. Don't remember the claimed accuracy/velocity spread improvements though. These nuts of course were using different mesh sizes. So I join that recommendation mainly because the TB is so much larger.go to walmart and get a SS mesh collider strainer. The holes are large enough for some types of ball to fall through but not varget.
I have seen several people try this and has worked each time
I have a jug from the same lot number that has yet to show signs of contamination. The unique shape of the different powders makes it relatively easy to detect contamination in this instance. Makes one wonder how often stick shaped powders, having different burn characteristics, become commingled and are not detected?I picked up two 8.8 jugs this weekend. I only opened one and it has trail boss contamination. Contacted Hodgdon, they had me send in some pics, waiting to hear back. Lot number MEM7792 both jugs. I’m only seeing very very very minimal pieces mixed in. Like if I had to guess, one piece per half pound but haven’t dumped any out. Just shaking it up and looking at it. Sucks cause I got these on sale with price match for 383.
Well, there ya' go. always a catch, eh.I got these on sale
Did you shoot any of the lot number? Curious to see if you noticed anything unusual about it? And why is this not being recalled. Kinda assume if it was very unsafe that would force a massive recall. But since it’s minor contamination, they are just replacing on a case by case basis?I have a jug from the same lot number that has yet to show signs of contamination. The unique shape of the different powders makes it relatively easy to detect contamination in this instance. Makes one wonder how often stick shaped powders, having different burn characteristics, become commingled and are not detected?
That release form is a corporate cover-your-ass.Hodgdon got back to me. Told me to dispose of the jugs, and not use the 200 rounds I already loaded. They will send out two new jugs once I sign the release form. No sorry for the inconvience or wasted ammo.
I’ve not loaded any rounds from the lot in question. A visual inspection was performed by pouring a large amount onto a sheet of 18X48 paper after reading this thread. Only powder sticks were observed, no little donuts.Did you shoot any of the lot number? Curious to see if you noticed anything unusual about it? And why is this not being recalled. Kinda assume if it was very unsafe that would force a massive recall. But since it’s minor contamination, they are just replacing on a case by case basis?
I guess it’s a good thing they replaced it but I agree with you and another response to your post that a heart felt were very sorry and here’s a 3rd 8 pounder for all your trouble with our product!……we all know that they probably have $10 out of pocket per jug which is very cheap compared to the lawsuit your wife would have filed if the bolt ended up in your brain pan!… very poor customer service at best!… I have many 8 lb and 1 lb jugs of Varget I better check my lot numbers!Hodgdon got back to me. Told me to dispose of the jugs, and not use the 200 rounds I already loaded. They will send out two new jugs once I sign the release form. No sorry for the inconvience or wasted ammo.

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.