Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
thanks for reminding me- i need to get some stems--Why are seating dies not designed to contact the bullet based on the ogive called out for that caliber?
Instead we've got this weird crap going on where the seating stem is pressing on the nose somewhere.....
Many years ago I tried to get the machinist that made the Hoover tipping dies to make one. Mic McPherson suggested one years ago and I presented that to the machinist as a new product but it got shrugged off. The prototype is based on a Redding Comp Bushing sizing die but with an insert matched or machined with a chamber reamer or throating reamer matching your throat. I messed with it a little but put it aside years ago saying I'll get back to it but haven't.Why are seating dies not designed to contact the bullet based on the ogive called out for that caliber?
They still don't look like they come anywhere near where the lands actually touch the ogive or do they?Only 2 calibers available now, but I have been using the 7mm for 3 years now and they work great.
The problem with the smaller OD stems is when you get them close enough to the actual land touch point is they want to crack and split because they become too thin.Basically a hollow tube of the correct ogive diameter.
So.....The problem with the smaller OD stems is when you get them close enough to the actual land touch point is they want to crack and split because they become too thin.
So.....
It's not possible to design dies with a larger diameter seating stem on the die body?
They still don't look like they come anywhere near where the lands actually touch the
Correct review, yet the underlying assumption posed is that you need to be as close to the pressure ring as possible. Having used the Blake stem for several years now, my experience has shown this seater to be extremely consistent, bullet after bullet. That tells me the assumption may not be correct.They still don't look like they come anywhere near where the lands actually touch the ogive or do they?
This is what I described with the Mcpherson/Redding bushing die concept. A larger diameter seating stem (the bushing) with the proper internal profile. The bushing is relieved to clear the case neck so it can come down far enough to contact the land touch point.It's not possible to design dies with a larger diameter seating stem in the die body? I'm not talking about making the seating stem thin. Just making the seating stem contact the bullet at the ogive.
Sending a PM. Perhaps someone already addressed this and I just haven't seen it.Correct review, yet the underlying assumption posed is that you need to be as close to the pressure ring as possible. Having used the Blake stem for several years now, my experience has shown this seater to be extremely consistent, bullet after bullet. That tells me the assumption may not be correct.
I think I see what you did there. I will study it more.I agree with the OP that this is the best approach and I have patented a seater die that does this. superior-precision.com
PM sentThis is what I described with the Mcpherson/Redding bushing die concept. A larger diameter seating stem (the bushing) with the proper internal profile. The bushing is relieved to clear the case neck so it can come down far enough to contact the land touch point.
I agree, Paul...there's a reason the Wison stems are sized that way.On a Wilson die, I believe having the stem very close to bullet diameter also helps guide the bullet straight into the case. Not sure if a bigger stem diameter would have a big enough advantage to offset the lost bullet guidance? Interesting discussion though.
Paul