Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was thinking the same - like two steps up and two steps down in .3gr steps from the current charge.If the OP could do a powder charge test by exploring incremental powder charge weights on either side of what worked in the past, ..... that would be interesting.
It took me over a hundred shots to get the groups to come down. I had to be very technically sound or else I'd pull shots.You might learn you can’t get used to a chassis. I tried and tried. Wasn’t for me
I know my biggest problem was the flat bottom stock. I didn’t want to spend the time, money to correct it.It took me over a hundred shots to get the groups to come down. I had to be very technically sound or else I'd pull shots.
I moved on as well.
This stock doesn’t have a vblock,the clearance around the Barrel is a lot,the bolts are not bottoming out in the front or back. As you can see there is a recess in the aluminum block on the underside so the bottom metal witch has pillers molded in the bottom metal can fit very nicely and the bolts heads are in direct contact with the aluminum making good contact.The chassis stock in question is a molded in v-block. It has it's own
can of worms over a full one piece aluminum chassis. Biggest problem
with the cast chassis over a mono block, is temperature......I do not bed
my chassis but do rub fit them in tight. I also do not bed my lug. Trick
on my end is to place a piece of .004" mylar tape on the lug face after
checking the lug face cut is true to the V-block. I use 3 screw actions and
tighten them to stock specs. period......Best I can tell the OP to do is to bed
that particular stock, check channel clearance, and do your normal load
work for what you have......Note.....Are the action screws compressing
composite plastic material as it snugs down the action, 0r is there a direct
metal contact at the bottom of the block ??
I had a CZ 527 one time that shot very well. Took it apart and cleaned it. When I went out to check the zero, the groups were horrible.
Took me forever to figure out the problem, but while reassembling, I didn't get the magazine box placed correctly into the action and it was binding against the stock and not allowing the action to sit fully against the stock.
Everything was tight, but just not seated correctly. Once I figured it out and got the magazine box back in correctly, the gun shot like it used to.
In my experience, changing group size with different torque settings, is the gold standard indicator that the rifle is in need of quality bedding work. I'd be willing to bet that if your rifle responds to different torque settings, it will demonstrate action stress with a dial indicator.im wondering if different torque settings would help?