jxb
Gold $$ Contributor
Google it,How was F-class created?
that range is having a F-Tac category at the August Fclass match and allowing brakes. Perfect time to show your support. But I'd rather you join with a real fclass gun.That range has been on my radar, but it’s a bit further than I can travel to try something new. I believe it’s about as far away as you could get from me.
My range already does it. It doesn’t seem to cause problems.that range is having a F-Tac category at the August Fclass match and allowing brakes. Perfect time to show your support.
Not really….. George went about it through the organization and didn’t just show up to a match and expect the rules to be bent for him. He created a new division. So, no, you are not correct.You’re being a smartass but I don’t think you realize the irony of it.
“1. F-Class was named after the founder of this type of shooting: George “Farky” Farquharson of Canada. As he aged, his eyesight and unsteady muscles started giving out. He wanted to find a way to continue shooting with his longtime competition friends. So, he petitioned the Dominion of Canada Rifle Association (DCRA) to allow him to replace his iron sight with a telescopic one, and use something to rest his rifle on, rather than try to hold it still with a sling. Luckily, the DCRA granted his request.”
Hmm kinda like PRS shooters that want to petition to create a division they can use their rifles in.
In other words, my point stands![]()
Nobody suggested showing up to matches expecting accommodation, or at least I don’t recall one instance of such in the thread. I hope that isn’t what you believe I’m advocating.Not really….. George went about it through the organization and didn’t just show up to a match and expect the rules to be bent for him. He created a new division. So, no, you are not correct.
Yes, the OP does suggest creating another division. Many posts in this thread advocate allowing ‘run what ya brung’ to an F class match. That is why Palo Alto range created the Field Precision Rifle class for ‘tactical’ type rifles. It is run on a separate schedule than HP Rifle and can use brakes. F class / sling shooters can also shoot as a practice match but must tolerate brakes. Almost all competitors run no brake or a suppressor in FPR. I think combining the two may lose more F class/ sling shooters than adding brake wielding miscreants. Just kidding about the last characterization.Nobody suggested showing up to matches expecting accommodation, or at least I don’t recall one instance of such in the thread. I hope that isn’t what you believe I’m advocating.
I believe the OP was suggesting doing exactly what George did; creating a new division.
They sure act like it’s the end of the world! LOLShouldn’t be a problem for PRS shooters to remove a muzzle brake to comply with a set of rules.
I don't think @drop_point or the other guy arguing to allow brakes in FClass are a proper representation of the PRS community.They sure act like it’s the end of the world! LOL
And let's not forget there isn't a mirage shield made that will deal with the heat problems that will cause in string fire. Mandatory? That would be a stupendously silly decision on the part of the NRA, CMP or any other sanctioning body for any of the competitive disciplines. Speaking for myself, I'll quit competing if suppressors were made mandatory. Take a look at the rules as written. As is typical, rules restrict what one can use, not require that something must be used. Caliber and chambering restrictions for F-Open and F-TR notwithstanding, everything else in the rules deal with what cannot be used. One is free to shoot F-open with a sling and irons, and the same for F-TR so long as the rifle is chambered in .223 or .308. Optics, front rests/bipods, and rear bags are not required equipment.For those who feel that Suppressors should become mandated by the NRA , I have several thoughts on the issue .
#1 . Cost of both the suppressor , and the Federal paper-work only add to a sport that is already getting out of hand cost-wise , for the average person .
Saying you want to "Grow" the sport , and then adding that cost to a rifle , that already cost from $2,000 - $8,000 , or more is just a little silly , unless the objective is to "price" some out of shooting , so it's "Just Us" , on the firing Line . Beside that is the fact that they are not Legal in all states , but I don't know which they are out-lawed in .
Fixed that for you, Will.You cannot shoot F/TR with any forward support except a bipod. So, you can't shoot over a sack of sawdust, for instance. Perhaps, one could attach a sack of sawdust, with two feet on it, to the rifle with velcro and call it a bipod. There would only be protests if the competitor, so equipped, won a match!