What’s it take to be competitive in each on?
Isn’t prs more on the shooter? A half minute rifle with a good shooter.
Isn’t f-class more like benchrest, a tuning/wind reading/money game?
I suspect some people in prs don’t even reload. A lot of people are not interested in the tuning part. I can count on one hand the people that I know personally that take part in the real tuning part. Probably people want to just shoot and not pull their hair out trying to get a gun to shoot in the 1’s. Add to that, the shooter/rifle interface, actually shooting the rifle instead of the rest, is a whole different game. More real/practical.
I don’t take part in either but I get it. The practical side of it. More people are interested in something that relates to real world shooting. Bipod on the hood of the pickup shooting a coyote kinda stuff. Less time in the lab, more behind the gun.
There are fewer course standards in PRS because the MD can decide on the degree of difficulty for the course, however....
It takes a tight gun to win in PRS just like it does in F-Class, if we are talking about more than one day and in many types of weather.
Imagine if the F-Class and BR games were to suddenly count all the sighters, and spent the whole match jumping from 600, to 800, to 1000, for just one shot each under time pressure?
Imagine if all PRS matches were at known distances and used prone but had 22 minutes to shoot 15 to 20 for record?
Most PRS guns that are in the top page, are shooting pretty tight. Most F-Class guns have no choice but to shoot tight if they are competitive. It turns out, both types of competitor consider being under 0.5 MOA to be their standard, otherwise they know they are leaving points on the table.
I am sure there are some beginners who come to both games with guns that cannot clean a standard F-Class target at 600 yards on a windless day, but that doesn't matter since the shooter and wind call effects will swamp that error. They won't make Master with those stats, but they can have fun learning and climbing while they figure it out.
By the same token, the PRS folks who are on the top of the page have rigs that are shooting under 0.5 MOA for the duration of the match, and the same is true when discussing the MA and HM level in Highpower and F-Class.
There are very few examples of folks shooting factory ammo in either game and doing well for any duration.
The vast majority of (above average) PRS folks reload, and do it pretty well when tested.
In the end, both games are pretty tough in terms of the performance of the weapon system in order to be competitive. The field target games force better marksmanship and shooting under pressure, and they require better physical ability.
When you take a good smallbore 3P shooter, and have them try the rimfire version of PRS, they do very well. I have not seen the opposite (having a good rimfire PRS shooter try 3p) to date, but I am not going to claim I could possibly know either. Their guns and ammo are shooting very tight at the top levels.