With all respect, I think that is a distinction without a difference. We subsidized roads for motor vehicles, airports for airplanes, railroad tracks for trains. Each of those are a particular design. Now that these legacy industries have to compete with a start up guy who makes electric cars when everyone laughed at him, suddenly subsidies bad? Very few industries in America have paid their own way without help. Almost every industry received some kind of start up help. The sale of tractors is subsidized by government loans to farmers.@fn1889m, all those subsidies were for infrastructure and to develop the country and economy. Subsidizing charging networks qualifies, and I can accept that within limits (not however to hundreds of $billions in a decade!)…. But there's never been a massive subsidy for a particular design of a consumer product such as motor vehicles.
-
https://www.fsa.usda.gov/programs-and-services/farm-loan-programs/index
I am neither for nor against subsidies as such. Each one should be evaluated based upon benefit versus cost. I personally think we should give electric vehicles a foot up. But the truth is, it’s probably not going to be necessary in the long run. (Except as we compete with other countries that do subsidize their industries.) They are in general a pretty good product that can compete head on with ICE vehicles overtime. But compared to the Enormous amount of tax dollars paid to subsidize other industries, directly and indirectly, electric vehicles and charging networks don’t even tip the scale.
Last edited: