With the stroke of a pen, the EPA can set mileage goals that can't reasonably be met by the auto industry. And they are considering it.It has not been implemented, and not likely to be. I do not support such mandatory sales quotas. It might very well get there though. Plug in vehicles were nearly 10% of sales last year. Though sales do appear to be slowing their year over year increases.
The Federal government is subsidizing the auto industry's production of EV''s with OUR tax money. For instance Elon Musk made $513 million dollars in environmental credits issued by governments around the world because he manufactured EVs and he was able to sell these credits to other auto makers who couldn't meet environmental requirements.
I really don't care either way. For me, at my age, I don't plan to ever buy another vehicle, but if I do, it will be a cheap/throw away internal combustion engine car. The main point of my post is that if they had started an organized and thoughtful transition to EVs in areas where EVs could be used to meet the needs of people living there, and if they had strengthened the electrical grid to support those areas, they might have started a change that could be sustainable (I really hate to use that stupid word).
But, they didn't. And the whole (solar, wind, and EVS) change to sustainable energy is crumbling. Because it's a liberal/elite pipe dream that is not based on reality. The reality is that the expense of the whole pipe dream is on us, the average guy. And it's based on faulty and manipulated science. This country is on shaky ground.