It's not as simple as a yes or no answer. But if we assume it does, wouldn't that be free speed with less powder being used to do the same work, kinda thing?Doesn't loading into the lands increase pressure ?
Both myself and my best Friend Ed Bernabeo are jumping my 112 grain 30 BR between .015 and .020.
We have tried every seating depth imaginable, and that’s what it likes.
Kinda same here. When all else fails, try it. Most often, I find the best at some amount of jam but if one acts stupid and just doesn't seem to like what you're doing, by all means, try jumping. I still find it to typically repeat at only a small amount of jump as compared to what some do but jumping, nonetheless. My rule of thumb is from +.010 to -.010. A few a litlle more and a few a little less but it's always close.In all the years I've been shooting and all the barrels I have used, there was only one 6 PPC that shot better jumping. I was ready to pull it and turn it into a Decoy anchor when a buddy suggested to try jumping. So next day, went to the range and just spun the seater and it wound up at .040" jump. First 5 shot group was about an .080" and at that setting was one of the best 100 yard barrels I ever had. I never was able to get it to shoot at 200, it just splattered, but at 100 was great. In those days, like most of us, I was using Button rifled barrels.
Later, Mark Buettgen
Bartlein Barrels Inc.
I am new to this bench stuff, so please bear with me.No. Every competitive rifle I have ever used did best around. 020 to .040 into the rifling. One came alive at .050 into the rifling, pushing the bullet into alignment I would assume. I am sure there's exceptions to this rule, but this has been my experience with some very accurate rifles. Good luck with your testing!
Paul
You don't. It's a terminology thing and the only real reason for "speaking in the various languages" regarding jam and touch etc, are for communicating numbers, mostly on internet forums. To your point...you're right. full jam, in my definition, is as far into the lands a given bullet can be pushed with a specific amount of "neck tension"...another term that gets used/misused..but we know what is meant by.I am new to this bench stuff, so please bear with me.
If you measure hard jam (where the barrel seats the bullet) how do you get .020 to .040 longer into the rifling ? Or am I not quite understanding what you are saying ?
Thanks.You don't. It's a terminology thing and the only real reason for "speaking in the various languages" regarding jam and touch etc, are for communicating numbers, mostly on internet forums. To your point...you're right. full jam, in my definition, is as far into the lands a given bullet can be pushed with a specific amount of "neck tension"...another term that gets used/misused..but we know what is meant by.
Just remember that most or all tools sold for measuring, say touch point, are comparators. They aren't intended to give actual dimensions between say mine and your comparator tool. But if we say touch, that has a meaning, regardless of what the number is on a set of calipers or whatever. So, if I say I'm .010 off of touch, we're speaking the same language is all. Not that it'll shoot best in your gun though and the actual number on the caliper will likely be different, yours to mine....but .010 off of touch is just that. Assuming the same and consistent manner of finding touch is used for both people involved. If only one person...It doesn't matter how you come to a number as long as it's repeatable.
No. Touch is just that...the point at which the bullet just touches the lands. There are methods to measure this to around a thou, consistently, maybe even a little less. But again. as long as it's consistent, it doesn't matter. Your gun and consistent method stands on its own. Remember, touch or jam is just terminology for conversing purposes. Nothing more. Since there's no way to know that my touch will shoot in your gun, it is nothing more than a close place to start...again, for conversing only. If I say my gun shoots best at just touching but our methods vary in how we find touch or even the actual measurement itself..but yours shoots best at your just touch point also...then who cares? You just found what matters. Most people these days consider jam to be touch plus however far into the lands beyond that they are. .010 jam= touch+.010Thanks.
OK ... is jam and touch the same thing (in my rifle) ?
If so, my question still remains.
Absolutely, we have to remember these numbers are relative ONLY. Meaning each rifle will show a different set of numbers. Touch - is simply touching the lands. In the lands - is anything past touch until Hard Jam is reached and Hard Jam is as far as the bullet will go without the bolt seating the bullet deeper into the case.No. Touch is just that...the point at which the bullet just touches the lands. There are methods to measure this to around a thou, consistently, maybe even a little less. But again. as long as it's consistent, it doesn't matter. Your gun and consistent method stands on its own. Remember, touch or jam is just terminology for conversing purposes. Nothing more. Since there's no way to know that my touch will shoot in your gun, it is nothing more than a close place to start...again, for conversing only. If I say my gun shoots best at just touching but our methods vary in how we find touch or even the actual measurement itself..but yours shoots best at your just touch point also...then who cares? You just found what matters. Most people these days consider jam to be touch plus however far into the lands beyond that they are. .010 jam= touch+.010
Thanks Bill! You said it better than I did and in fewer words.Absolutely, we have to remember these numbers are relative ONLY. Meaning each rifle will show a different set of numbers. Touch - is simply touching the lands. In the lands - is anything past touch until Hard Jam is reached and Hard Jam is as far as the bullet will go without the bolt seating the bullet deeper into the case.