• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

IDOD/AutoDOD - Neck Turning Marvel?

@Jager, if I am reading your spreadsheets correctly, it looks like you are trying to take .0005" off of your expanded necks.

Here is what I learned about my AutoDoD. I shoot .284 and 7-6.5 PRC. Once expanded to 7mm and fire formed, my case necks are just under .015" on average. As thin as .0143" thick on some parts of the neck and as tick as .0152" on other parts of the same neck. The runout of my brass after firing w/o sizing is between .0015 and .002 measured in the AutoDod case holder and carefully turning the collet holder.

I want may case necks to be .0135". That is taking an average of .0015" off. See the problem? My runout is equal to the amount of brass I want to take off.

So, one solution is to change reamers to one with a tighter neck that will allow me to take more brass off case neck. Instead of a .316 reamer/chamber neck diameter, I am going to switch and experiment with a .315 or .314 and turn my necks down to .0125 taking .0025" to .003" which is greater than the runout.

The AutoDoD is quite an investment and if it doesn't work in your current system you have to decide if it is worth it to change upstream processes or components to experience the expected benefit.

You put together a vary readable and respectable review. I know it will help a lot of folks considering ways to speed up or reduce some of the tedium in parts of the process. Well done, Sir; well done!

Hank

Thanks, Hank. You raise some excellent points.

My neck-turning target is a nominal .010, with a slight bias to the heavy side. The manual PMA tool I used in these examples was factory-spec'd at a nominal .010. My particular example of that tool comes in closer to .011 using my neck-turn process and my lots of both Lapua and Peterson brass.

You're absolutely right that case runout makes a huge difference with the IDOD. Blake makes it very clear, both on his web site and in the instructions for the IDOD, that the amount of brass we're removing must be greater than the case runout.

The .30 BR, after being formed from 6 BR, loses thickness in the neck. Because of that, even with a negligible runout of ~.001 it barely squeaks by that IDOD requirement. That may very well be part of the problem.

The benefits I imagined getting from the IDOD/AutoDOD were:
  1. Extreme precision with respect to case neck concentricity and thickness, bettering the .0002 - .0003 case neck variation I typically see with my manual process.
  2. No session-to-session variability. Cases turned today, if from the same lot, would turn to the exact same dimensions as those turned a month ago, or a year ago.
  3. Speed and efficiency - the ability to turn a bunch of cases relatively quickly.
  4. Dry process - eliminating the messy lubricating oil that we typically see with neck turning on a mandrel.
I'm not a machinist, nor a mechanical engineer. But looking at the design of the IDOD, I'm increasingly cynical that the level of precision we're talking about (less than .0002") can be achieved in a system with two fixed halves, with no float on either end, and with one end having the requirement for quick and easy removal/insertion of the case... at a price point that works at the consumer level.

I would like to be wrong!

I'm sending Blake the six IDOD cases I turned here and he's going to try and see if he can replicate the problem.
 
Last edited:
Having never used one, I can't comment on the machine. But having made lots of 30BR cases over the years, the runout comes from the base of the new neck...this used to be the upper shoulder area before being expanded. I refer to it as 'the lump'. The neck needs to be straightened relative to the case body...which isn't so easy to do because the 'lump' is what is tilting the neck.

If you're mechanically expanding the necks ( not pushing the necks over a mandrel chucked up in a lathe), here's a simple way to straighten the necks while addressing the 'lump'.


Good shootin' :) -Al
 
Thanks, guys.

Had a really nice chat with Katie from F-Class Products a little bit ago. She says they'll make it right one way or another. Bryan is off hunting with his boy for a few days - best of luck to them. She'll discuss this with him when he gets back.

We'll see if there's anything to be done.
Since so much is the set-up it seems to me that they could send previous buyers a modular block with cutters set to perfect alignment. That would be much more helpful than returning some correct cases.
 
I fashioned a neck "peeler" from a 6mm expanding mandrel and part of a Forster outside neck turner, DC motor and controller, and some cheap drive components off eBay. The turner and mandrel rotate as one unit (rather than the case). Oil the mandrel and manually advance the case neck over the mandrel and into the cutter. This can be a mild interference fit because the oil film generated will open the neck slightly from hydrodynamic pressure. You press the neck against the rotating mandrel and slowly advance it to a hard stop. Links:



The movie looks and sounds appalling, but the mandrel runout is negligible. I'm not an expert on neck turning; I only made this because I had some old drive parts laying around and had to process 500 rounds of Lapua .223 brass (thicker neck than other brands) into 6 x 45. Perhaps there's no real advantage over neck turning, but it was a fun winter project.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2098 copy.JPG
    IMG_2098 copy.JPG
    53.5 KB · Views: 29
Last edited:
Hello, just got back from Hunting with my dad and two younger boys, unfortunately our hunt success went about as well as the turning of your 30 BR brass.... No success.

Thank you for the detailed review. The 30 BR is the absolute worst case to neck turn in our machine, has always been and I am sure always will be. The reason is simple on why, the deformation of the amount of material being spread into all kinds of directions, it is just nearly impossible to do all that expansion and then expect not only the concentricity to remain good enough to turn about the axis of the body, but also the same amount of material being pushed to be consistent around the axis of the body as well.

First, lets negate we are even talking about neck turning here, lets talk about the physics that is happening. We are rotating about an axis, and then we are taking that same axis (body of the case rotation) and then having a set of cutters that is true about that axis of rotation. So the cutters, nor the machine know or even care what case or what case neck thickness you are trying to achieve.

After the cut is made what we are seeing is the RESULT from rotation of the body of the case about its axis, with a relative resulting solution, the case neck thickness, and variation.

This is why we say you have to have LESS neck to body axial runout then the amount you are trying to remove.

The machine is not some magical device that will magically make any necks straight or when turned, make them straight, but what the machine can guarantee is that the TURNED area (hopefully the entire neck inside and out) will be coaxial and congruent thickness.

Think of it this way, you have a row of cones and these cones are in a "S" pattern. You drive your car next to the cones and only hit the ones that are hanging out the most. Ok, now move your car over even more and now you are hitting more cones, keep doing this until you have moved your car over the amount that the cones are spread apart.

Now lets compare it to a barrel that is being chambered. Can I chuck a barrel on my lathe, indicate the OUTSIDE of the barrel and then chamber it and expect the chamber to be concentric to the rifling? No, but why not? Because you have to make sure your chamber is concentric and coaxial to the rifling, but why is the rifling not concentric to the outside? Because in the machining process it was not made concentric enough on the ID and OD to use the OD for chambering concentricity.

Now that I hopefully have made it what physically is happening when rotating about one axis and truing a feature of that part (the case neck) to be coaxial has a mathematical function.

If the case body is being held concentric and coaxial, meaning the case holder to case fitment is correct (different lots of brass, etc. can make it to where a case may not be held coaxial and or concentric in the case holder, therefore not forcing the concentricity and coaxial alignment to be true to the spindle of the machine), and the amount of material being removed off of the wall thickness, is MORE than the amount of case body to neck coaxial alignment, then it is physically impossible for the machine to not cut necks that are coaxial and congruent on thickness rotationally around the neck.

From what I see you are attempting to remove less material than the amount of runout that the case neck to body coaxial alignment is, prior to turning. This will never work unless you remove more material than you have of runout.

This doesn't just apply to 30 BR, but to any lathe operation, even if you were turning a piece of steel in your lathe, and it had .030" of runout, but to get to your desired diameter, you could only remove .025". It would be physically impossible to cleanup that piece of steel to be nice and round all the way around, correct? Same physics apply here on neck turning when datuming off of the body of the case.

Now lets address the next phenomenon. Why do we turn necks in the first place? I mean sure you can run a no turn neck, many do correct? Even with success, so there is nothing that says to win you have to turn, right? Why do we do it? We do it to eliminate a variable that we can control. What are variables we cant control in shooting? Well the wind, image shift in mirage in a boil, the jacket thickness concentricity to the lead core of the bullet, etc. So what we do as shooters is do our best to eliminate every variable possible to be able to have the least amount of variables during the shooting cycle so that the variables we cannot control have the least amount of effect on our accuracy we desire.

As a mechanical engineer I am exposed to all sorts of forces and variable in the industrial industry. With that it is a known mechanical attribute that when you have a cylindrical force on an object in the static state, if that force is not consistent around the entire cylindrical force, you get more force on one side of the object, then you do on the other. So when the firing cycle of the cartridge happens, there is more force on one side of that bullet than the other if you have inconsistent forces holding that bullet in. So what many bench-resters try and do (from what I am told, I am not a BR shooter) is soft seating. So that there is hardly any force on that bullet from the case neck and the lands of the rifling set the seating depth. Why would you want to do this? Because now the case neck variable has little to no effect on the bullet release.

So back to why do we neck turn, we neck turn to control a variable and to have that variable be as consistent as possible. Think of your box of 500 Berger bullets. Excellent bullets as can all agree, but how many national champions are grabbing bullets out of the box and loading and shooting? If I had to guess, not many if any at all. Well why is that? That is because even though they are the best bullets available they still require us as shooters to take the variables we can measure and sort them, bullet genie, oal, ogive to base measurements, meplate trimming and pointing, etc.

Now I am going to let you know if you have survived my ranting for the last few paragraphs and got this far into my post, what I have found in approximately 100,000 rounds of actual ballistic fired testing at ranges usually at 1000 yards.

When people say you turn to an EXACT thickness, meaning lets say your at .011" after expanding your 6 BR brass to 30 cal, and you need to be at exactly .010" thickness. Ok, that may be true, but what is more important in my findings is that you have CONSISTANT thickness across all cases and across all portions of that case neck, inside and out. What I mean is, if you could get exact, perfect cleanup at .009", why would you go to this magic number of .010" In my testing, having increased loaded round neck to chamber clearance always helps and never hinders, why though? Because you want that neck to be completely out of the way and release that bullet perfectly consistently to allow the bullet to be guided by the freebore of your chamber, and then hopefully coaxial to your barrel's rifling, and then on to the point of aim at your target. I was told this early on by multiple national champions in F class that at the time were running up to .009" loaded round to chamber neck clearance!!! Holy cow, this was before I ever even designed the IDOD. I asked why so much clearance when most I had heard at that time were running .003" to .004" loaded round clearance, and there reply was that it seemed to be more accurate.

So I started doing my own testing, I tested accuracy, brass life longevity, work hardness, etc of turning necks thinner and thinner and thus increasing the neck to chamber loaded round clearance higher and higher.

What I found was there was nothing I could find on the target for accuracy going from .004" to .012" loaded round to chamber neck clearance that would inhibit accuracy, nor brass life.

When I hear guys talk about a "skim cut" on brass necks, cleaning up 70% or whatever percentage they are trying to achieve, what are we achieving here? Why would you want only 70% cleanup? Do you want only 70% accuracy? Many are afraid of too thin of necks and it does not make physical sense when you look at all of the physics involved.

Now lets talk about mandrel turning, as that is what this post is comparing you posted. Ok, so we take a piece of material (we are talking just material at this point, not a case neck) and you form it (expand your case neck). We have all heard about that if you expand your imperfections on the inside of the case to the outside and then turn them, then the id and od will be consistent.

Well how can that physically be? Doesn't ALL materials have some sort of elasticity? In the engineering world this is called elastic modules and also yielding of material can be in this discussion as well. If you take any material, say a coat hanger, and bend it, does it stay at the point you bent it? No, because that piece of material that you have forced into a new shape has a yielding factor. Yielding is where the point that a piece of material does not go back to its original shape.

This applies to brass also, why is it I can expand my brass with a .308 expander, but my .308 diameter bullet does not just nicely slip in and out of the brass case with ease? The same applies here, so we have now discussed that even though you are expanding the imperfections of the material to the outside, that is physically impossible as the thicker portions of the case neck that the was expanded with your expanding mandrel did not expand at the same distance as the thinner portions, therefore your thickness imperfections are now still on the inside.

So now you turn on a mandrel, ok, so the cut looks nice and shiny on the outside, you have now made the outside of the case be nice and round, it will not be coaxial to the body of the case body, and the inside of the case neck is not round and as consistent as the outside. But it makes the guy or gal turning the brass feel good because it is a nice shiny cut around. Well then you take your micrometer, and measure around, you find a variation (just like the original posters comments were) that it is not consistent as you would like it. Why though? Because when the brass was formed with a big force of extrusion and punches, the brass did not flow the same everywhere and you still have those imperfections on the inside even after you mandrel turn.

Now onto the salesman part of me, as I have shown my mechanical engineering knowledge, I will talk about the success of ID and OD turning.

In the F class world, many national championships have been won, records have been set, and shooters that were good shooters for years that just switched recently to ID and OD turning are now winning even after turning conventional methods. Now lets keep it real here, all of these shooters could of potentially done the wins they have with other methods, certainly.

After 400+ units being sold all over the world, the IDOD and AUTODOD work well when certain parameters are met. If I buy a race car and it overheats in traffic, is it the cars fault, or is it because the race car was designed to run at certain parameters and if those parameters are not met, then issues will happen, sure.

After all of this and the issues, we will gladly take the machine back, for a full refund if you are not satisfied. I get it is a lot of money but it takes a lot of money to manufacture. Its not like I have 500.00 of overhead cost in these units, and making 2000 dollars profit on each one. The bearings used are the highest precision Japanese bearings available, everything is meticulously assembled and manufactured, then there is QC checks, but multiple people, etc.

Compare the number of parts and precision on the IDOD and AUTODOD to that of a Bat Nuevo action that cost about the same. Which product do you think has more time, and parts overhead built into the product?...
 
Hey Bryan. The OP here. Thanks for the long explication. Sorry the hunt wasn't a success, but time in the woods with your boys and your dad... well, just doesn't get any better than that, does it?!

I agree with most of what you wrote. Including the oft-repeated (mis)belief that running a mandrel through a case neck will somehow magically push all the imperfections to the outside.

And I also agree that, because a 6 BR case loses thickness in the neck when it is necked-up to .30 BR, the .30 BR might be a marginal candidate for use on the IDOD (I mentioned that just a few posts above, in post 22).

Where I'm seeing things differently than you is in the distortion you describe. If I was seeing case runout of .004 and .006 like you describe in your video, I'd certainly agree that that's not going to end well.

But that's not at all what I'm seeing. The runout of my .30 BR brass, using my normal forming process, before neck turning, is typically around .001.

Because of that negligible runout, I was doubtful that your new .30 BR .330 Neck FL Sizing Die would be helpful. I bought it in spite of those doubts. Alas, as you can see in the spreadsheet screenshots I shared in my original post, the new die didn't improve things, nor did it make things worse.

At that point, with the cases formed and ready for neck-turning, with negligible runout, six samples were sent through the IDOD; six samples were sent through a manual, handheld PMA tool.

The manually-turned samples all turned out fine. The IDOD-turned samples all turned out unusable.

I'm happy to be told that I'm doing something wrong. Or that the .30 BR is simply not a suitable candidate for the IDOD. I'd just like an answer to the mystery.

I dropped a box in the mail to you earlier this afternoon. It includes the six IDOD-turned samples (three Lapua, three Peterson) that I tracked and described in my original post; along with the case holder from the machine. I also included seven unturned .30 BR cases (three Lapua; four Peterson) so that you can examine them (and turn them yourself, if you like). I'd be interested in what you think after you've had a chance to look them over. The box should be there Wednesday.

Finally, I'll just say that we're fortunate here at AccurateShooter in that it's not all that uncommon to see a small business owner stop by occasionally to give us some information or clarify some product. What is far less common, though, is to have an owner take the time and spend the effort that you just did. That says a lot.

Wishing you and Katie and the rest of the team the very best. Hope y'all have a terrific Thanksgiving!
 
Greg,

Not sure if you are advocating for or against the AutoDOD for all of the non machinists.

Maybe as a kindred spirit inventor this is more about your experiences than Bryan’s.

I view this thread and the OPs comments as positive, willing to learn and laying out all the facts for future buyers to evaluate.

I really think the OPs comments should be held up as a model for how to review a product you are not getting the results you expected and asking for feedback on what might be wrong.

I think Bryan’s response is honest, transparent and ends with an offer to help or try to make the customer happy.

So, pretty perfect all around.

Hank
 
What a waste of time. My mistake.
To me it wasn't a waste of time. Too many here seem to think that they are rocket scientist, measuring in numbers that are no way repeatable with the devices most of us use. I thought what you wrote was nothing but the truth in how you saw it, same as how the op saw it. I think you may have hurt some feelings. But that is the way it goes. Sorry you took your post down I found it informative. Just as the op's and Bryan's.
 
Sorry I did not see what Greg had said. In my opinion, no need to delete as we are all here on an open forum to help and educate each other.
Bryan, All that matters is I have an AutoDOD, know how to use it, and it's the best neck turning solution currently available to the home handloader.

... and no, I disagree... we are not all here to help and educate each other. There are more here acting in bad faith than not, and I once again forgot that for a moment.
 
Bryan, All that matters is I have an AutoDOD, know how to use it, and it's the best neck turning solution currently available to the home handloader.

... and no, I disagree... we are not all here to help and educate each other. There are more here acting in bad faith than not, and I once again forgot that for a moment.
I did not see any of the other posts. But you think more than 50% here are acting in bad faith?
 
I think this is a great thread with wonderful responses and ideas. I also think probably 95% of the people on this forum are helpful and respectful to others. It is why outta the multitude of other forums I belong to this is the only one I return to on a daily basis, imho it’s the greatest forum on the web for the shooting world.
Wayne
 
Bryan, All that matters is I have an AutoDOD, know how to use it, and it's the best neck turning solution currently available to the home handloader.

... and no, I disagree... we are not all here to help and educate each other. There are more here acting in bad faith than not, and I once again forgot that for a moment.
This isn’t The Hide.. Feel free to explore other options.
 
“Case neck thickness congruency is unparralled (sp) when compared to any other neck turning system!”


The cost was utterly breathtaking. Two and a half grand is an awful lot of money for most of us.

But the promise it offered was tantalizing. Take the one handloading process which many of us find tedious and boring and lamentable and turn it into something almost akin to fun. And end up with a level of consistency and repeatability that bettered anything we had ever done before.

Was there, maybe, a competitive advantage hidden in that very steep entry fee?

I’m talking, of course, about F-Class Products’ innovative IDOD/AutoDOD neck-turning machine.

https://fclassproducts.com/autodod

Precision riflecraft is both a disease and a rabbit hole. It pulls you in, wallet first. I eventually caved, firing off an order to the good folks at @Bryan Blake 's shop. Two months later the large, heavy box showed up.

First impressions were beyond positive. We’ve all received countless packages, of course. This one was, for me, the first time that the packaging itself was an engineering marvel in and of itself. Long before you got to what was inside.

I shoot lots of different rifles. Lots of different calibers. But I’m primarily a short-range benchrest score shooter. And so although I envisioned using Bryan’s new invention in several different applications, my first and foremost use for it was to turn .30 BR brass.

No one makes .30 BR brass, of course. You have to form it yourself. I make mine out of virgin 6 BR brass. Usually Lapua. Sometimes Peterson.

Did I mention that I hate neck-turning?

I’ve been using a PMA tool (both Model A and Model B) and a hand drill. Works great. But fast that manual process is not.

One of the things I discovered some time ago with my manual neck-turn process is that although that process is both easy and straightforward, when I later took a ball micrometer and carefully measured neck wall thickness I could see a very slight difference between turning sessions. Cases turned today, despite using the exact same tools and the exact same process, would inevitably average out very slightly different to those turned a month ago. The difference was tiny, and almost certainly would never show up in results downrange. But I was taking no chances. I limited myself to turning relatively small batches – usually 50, no more than 100 cases – at a time, then kept each batch segregated.

It wasn’t lost on me that the IDOD – if I included the CNC-like AutoDOD option - would change all that.

There’s not an awful lot of information out there on the IDOD. But the handful of YouTube videos that are out there are fairly illuminating. And the color, printed-on-paper owner’s manual that ships with the machine is quite well done.

Once you cut through the newness of the machine, its initial sense of complexity disappears. Its concept of operation is pretty straightforward: A movable, in-and-out cutting head on one end; and a fixed collet on the other end to hold the piece of brass being turned.

The platform holding the cutting head can be moved back-and-forth perpendicularly to its normal in-and-out direction, in very tiny increments monitored with an attached dial gauge, and that’s how you adjust how much brass is being removed from the inside of the case neck. And the cutting head is itself adjusted, again in very tiny increments, to control how much brass is being removed from the outside of the case neck.

The AutoDOD option is like a mini-CNC, totally automating the speed and duration in which a cut is made. And since it’s the tiny variations in speed and duration that we introduce when turning necks by hand, the AutoDOD promises to have each case come out exactly, precisely the same.

The whole design is quite ingenious.

Getting things dialed in – the precise amount you want cut off the inside and the precise amount you want cut on the outside - is a little bit fiddly. And you’ll probably need to sacrifice a few pieces of brass. But that’s mostly a one-time thing. Unless you change caliber or headstamp or decide to change your neck thickness dimension, subsequent neck turning sessions should be pretty effortless.

Alas.

I won’t belabor the hours I spent trying one setup after another. Or the dozens and dozens of virgin Lapua – and, later, Peterson - 6 BR brass (formed into .30 BR) that were destroyed. What I ended up with, every single time, was gross variance in neck thickness.

In sample after sample, I would take a piece of .30 BR brass, formed out of virgin 6 BR, with negligible runout and with minimal case neck thickness variation, and after sending it through the IDOD/AutoDOD that neck thickness variation – the difference between the thickest and thinnest portions of the neck – would blow up. It wasn’t remotely concentric.

I kept persisting in my efforts, destroying more and more brass, because I felt surely it must be me doing something wrong. I re-did my setup from scratch easily half a dozen times.

Finally, after a long interval, I reached out to the good folks at F-Class Products. I received a prompt and pleasant reply with the suggestion that I purchase their new .330 Neck Full-Length Sizing Die (https://fclassproducts.com/purchase/p_3218469/30br-330nk-full-length-resizing-die), along with a .317 mandrel. Bryan recently came out with a video (
) in which he describes how the significant distortion created in forming .30 BR brass needs to be addressed by first over expanding the neck, and then sizing it back down using their precise new .330 neck die.

I had mixed feeling upon hearing this. On the one hand, the need for this new die and this new process suggested that I wasn’t alone in struggling to make the IDOD/AutoDOD work. On the other hand, that new die was itself $215, plus the cost of an oversize mandrel. More concerning than even that, though, was the premise for why this new .330 neck FL-Sizing die was necessary in the first place: brass was being heavily distorted when formed from 6 BR to .30 BR and thus needed to be “fixed.” My measurements told me otherwise.

In the end, though, it was a no-brainer. Having already invested nearly $3,000 in the IDOD/AutoDOD, a machine which had yet to turn a single usable case, I figured if another few hundred dollars was enough to get it working I’d be happy to pay it.

Having ordered the magic die, and with my query to F-Class Products on where I might obtain the odd-size .317 mandrel having gone unanswered, I looked around and found a 32-caliber .322 carbide expander mandrel from Brownell’s (https://www.brownells.com/reloading...ning/carbide-expander-mandrels/?sku=749014471) which I figured would work. With shipping that was another sixty-one bucks.

Throughout this whole, long saga with the IDOD/AutoDOD I had taken countless micrometer measurements, trying to figure out what was going on. With the new die and the new expander mandrel on the way, I decided to run as controlled a test as I possibly could.

From my diminishing supply of virgin 6 BR brass, I formed a couple dozen .30 BR cases. Half Lapua, half Peterson. From these newly-formed cases, I selected six random samples of Lapua and six random samples of Peterson.

I labeled each of these twelve pieces of brass with a unique identifier, using a sharpie. Three of the Lapua samples would be turned on the IDOD/AutoDOD; and three would be turned with my manual neck-turning process, using a PMA Model B and a hand drill.

Likewise for the six samples of Peterson.

My intent was to carefully measure each piece of brass through its entire lifecycle, from virgin 6 BR, straight out of the box, to fully formed and neck-turned .30 BR.

The rest of the brass I had formed would be used on the IDOD/AutoDOD, in advance of the six cases being tracked, in order to make sure its setup was as optimized as I could make it.

Here are the results of all those tests, first with the IDOD/AutoDOD-turned samples, followed by the manually neck-turned samples:


View attachment 1493671


View attachment 1493672


View attachment 1493673


View attachment 1493674



My first observation is that Bryan’s contention that forming .30 BR brass creates a heavily distorted case appears questionable. With negligible case runout and minimal neck thickness variation, it certainly seems to me that these formed cases are well controlled. For the record, the process I use for forming .30 BR cases is essentially the same as Wes demonstrates here (
), the only differences being that I wet-tumble (rather than dry-tumble) after turning; and I run mine through a FL Sizing die when done.

My second observation is that the extra step of over expanding the case neck using, in my case, the .322 expander mandrel, and then squeezing it back down to size using Blake’s new .330 Neck FL-Sizing die, didn’t really do much. It didn’t materially make things better. Nor did it make them meaningfully worse. Cases were in good shape before they went through that process. And they remained in good shape afterwards.

It's when those cases go through the IDOD/AutoDOD that things go off the rails, with concentricity literally coming apart at the seams. Case neck thickness variation explodes. None of those cases are remotely usable.

In contrast, the cases turned manually, using a PMA Model B and a hand drill, are fine.

A word about measurements. Getting accurate measurements with a micrometer can be a thing, of course, especially as the level of precision increases. To keep this test as grounded as possible, I used a micrometer stand for all measurements, carefully positioning the depth of measurement – how deep into the neck – exactly the same for each reading. After the first reading on each sample, I rotated the case just a tiny amount, took another reading, rotated another tiny amount… and so on, until I had rotated through and measured the entire circumference of the case neck. Typically ten to twelve measurements for each. And noting both the smallest dimension and the largest dimension.

To say that this was tedious and time consuming is an understatement. But since concentricity – dead precise case neck thickness – lies at the very heart of what the IDOD/AutoDOD promises to provide, and since that’s the very thing I wasn’t getting, I felt it important to spend that time and make that effort.

Curiously, in the handful of YouTube videos out there that showcase the IDOD/AutoDOD, Bryan’s included, I’ve not seen anyone do that. What you see instead is guys hurriedly taking a spot reading or two and, I guess, assuming that what they measured must hold for the entire circumference of the neck.

When I sent these results to F-Class Products, with a polite query if there was anything else I could try, I was met with silence.

I’d be happy to be told I’m an idiot. That I obviously don’t know how to form .30 BR brass. Or clearly I’m a klutz with a micrometer. Something. Anything. But nope. Just silence.

I think the kids call it ghosted, these days.

Our shooting world is blessed with many one-man shops and small, family-owned businesses. The products and services we receive from those many small outfits brings much richness to our sport. I wish Bryan and his team nothing but the best. I genuinely mean that.

But I’m left with the inevitable conclusion that the IDOD/AutoDOD simply doesn’t work on .30 BR brass. Maybe it does with other calibers. Probably it does. Hopefully it does. But after destroying well over a hundred virgin 6 BR cases in the attempt, I think I’m done.

And much as posting this pains me, it pains me even more to think of the next guy down the line making the same mistake I did.

Three grand is a lot of money.
I talked to the owner about buying one and he talked me right out of buying it for use in Short Range score. Kudo's to him for not bullshitting me.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,107
Messages
2,189,814
Members
78,706
Latest member
unkindyam1975
Back
Top