The 280 Remington is an Excellent cartridge that really should have outsold the 270 Winchester.
Exciting Times! ! !Surprise! Look what showed up today.!View attachment 1483374View attachment 1483375
Al, this Browning Stock already has steel inserts in the stock that act as pillars. The front one is actually part. Of the steel insert cross bolt that bolsters up the recoil lug. It’s a ptretty fancy setup.Jackie, what's your approach going to be for the pillars and bedding? -Al
It might have something to do with the .270s 32 year head start and the endorsement of Jeff Cooper. Personally, I love my 1943 Erma Mauser 98 sporter in .270 WIN. It is my "do it all" rifle, even though I have dedicated rifles for hunting specific critters. It shoots 120-150 grain bullets with equal and excellent accuracy which accommodates most NA game.The 280 Remington is an Excellent cartridge that really should have outsold the 270 Winchester.
It was actually Jack O'connor who put the 270 Winchester into it's slot in History. It's a good round. But the 280 is a better one in my book, Mainly because of the bullet selection for 7mm.It might have something to do with the .270s 32 year head start and the endorsement of Jeff Cooper. Personally, I love my 1943 Erma Mauser 98 sporter in .270 WIN. It is my "do it all" rifle, even though I have dedicated rifles for hunting specific critters. It shoots 120-150 grain bullets with equal and excellent accuracy which accommodates most NA game.
You‘re right about that. It’s interesting that Remington was chambering as many 280s as 270s up until the 7 mag came out. It seems in hind sight the 280 could have been marketed effectively as a better 270, rather than the 7 mags little brother, but I was a teenager in the 80s and my perception of what happened in the 70s is based on the writers of the day and what was being rewarded. I am probably way off of what marketing efforts actually were.The 280 Remington is an Excellent cartridge that really should have outsold the 270 Winchester.
Remington brought out the 280 to originally be sold in that Auto Loader of the mid ‘50’s. They had to de tune it for obvious reasons. They then just about made it obsolete with their own 7mm Remington Magnum in the early ‘60’s.You‘re right about that. It’s interesting that Remington was chambering as many 280s as 270s up until the 7 mag came out. It seems in hind sight the 280 could have been marketed effectively as a better 270, rather than the 7 mags little brother, but I was a teenager in the 80s and my perception of what happened in the 70s is based on the writers of the day and what was being rewarded. I am probably way off of what marketing efforts actually were.
![]()
Sorry, had an old man brain fart!It was actually Jack O'connor who put the 270 Winchester into it's slot in History. It's a good round. But the 280 is a better one in my book, Mainly because of the bullet selection for 7mm.
I forgot all about the 280 and the auto loader and pump - that seemed like an odd pairing to a kid from Wyoming, but probably sold well on the left and right coasts and down south.Remington brought out the 280 to originally be sold in that Auto Loader of the mid ‘50’s. They had to de tune it for obvious reasons. They then just about made it obsolete with their own 7mm Remington Magnum in the early ‘60’s.
Then they changed the name, called it the 7mm Remington Express. Not too many noticed.
So they then just started calling it the 280 again. It had low to moderate popularity with new rifle sales.
I think it is the perfect 7mm for these old vintage actions. The 280 has the same .473 head diameter of the original Mauser chamberings. You can push a 140 grn bullet in the 2900 fps range while keeping the pressures just below 50,000 psi.
Or a 150 or 160 in the 2600 fps range and not hurt anything.
Will, it's been a long time since I've put anything under the barrel shank for bedding. It didnt seem to hurt those old Mausers...my thinking at that time was it might add a bit of stiffness to the action...spread the load out.I have never been too sold on the idea of bedding the shank of the barrel. There is enough surface ahead of the recoil lug to allow the barrel to be floated entirely. Bedding the barrel shank often produced a little vertical the barrel warmed. Others may disagree, and I'm OK with that! WH
I have always felt that bedding much of the shank would cause vertical. Couldn't prove it, but the logic feels sound.I have never been too sold on the idea of bedding the shank of the barrel. There is enough surface ahead of the recoil lug to allow the barrel to be floated entirely. Bedding the barrel shank often produced a little vertical as the barrel warmed. Others may disagree, and I'm OK with that! WH