I'm simply saying a discipline that isn't as heavily focused on equipment appeals to me more.
I have the same philosophy. When I first started shooting NRA competitive pistol in the 70's, I shot revolvers because I always enjoyed shooting revolvers even though in that discipline, it was a handicap in the time and especially the rapid-fire stages. But I wanted to compete, just to see how competitive I could be with a revolver. That's the way it started.
I got fairly good, qualifying as a Distinguished Expert (285x300) and made our club's Gold Team (top five shooters). I was having fun reaching that level with a revolver. However, my teammates encouraged me to switch to semi-automatics to boost the team's average. So, I caved into the pressure, and I did shoot a litter better, but it was as much fun anymore. I had lost the reasons I got into this sport.
I had to quit competitive shooting in the mid 90's due to an arthritic elbow but I still shoot my revolvers, albeit 2 handed these days but enjoy shooting for score just to measure myself. I approach my rifle shooting the same way, I shoot for score every range session but I'm shooting against myself, measuring myself.
What I learned in competitive shooting was that it was the comradery with teammates that was the most rewarding aspect. It's also difficult, at least it was for me, not to get caught up in the equipment race. So, by all means pursue a competitive discipline that appeals to you, have fun doing it, enjoy the interaction with fellow shooters, but don't fall into the trap I did of getting caught up in the equipment race.
One rifle discipline that you may find fun is hunter's silhouette shooting, shooting animal steel targets at various ranges. I shot this in the 80's, the pistol version and it was a lot of fun. I managed to qualify AAA, again with a revolver.