brokeasajoke
Silver $$ Contributor
Not exactly disagreeing but that 44 mag with a 325 lfn/wfn will also penetrate full length at nearly any engagement angle. Foot pounds don't kill. Problem is controlling the big boomers recoil for just such a scenario. But conversely I too would prefer my rifle in most all circumstances.Yeah? Is that speaking from experience?
I’ve drawn a rifle on a bull moose coming my way up the mountainside and he wasn’t about to go around me. I backed off slowly as he advanced grunting and puffing about 10-15 yards apart from each other until I could get good clear of him while not having to turn my back. And I’ll tell you what, I wouldn’t have wished I had anything but the 338-375 Ruger rifle in my hands that I was packing that day. That is a massive animal. If he would have charged there’s no handgun I would have wanted in that situation over my rifle.
Same goes for grizzly bear. I’d much rather have a large hard hitting magnum rifle in my hands over any handgun. I definitely feel less safe thinking about encountering a pissed off grizzly bear during archery season when all I have is a handgun vs rifle season when I have my rifle with me.
The most powerful 44 magnum loads using 300-340gr bullets still only have a scant 1200-1600 ft lbs of energy at the muzzle. That pales in comparison to the 4,000-5,000+ ft lbs you can generate at the muzzle of a large magnum rifle.
Not exactly disagreeing but that 44 mag with a 325 lfn/wfn will also penetrate full length at nearly any engagement angle. Foot pounds don't kill. Problem is controlling the big boomers recoil for just such a scenario. But conversely I too would prefer my rifle in most all circumstances.
35 years of big game hunting and have taken a lot of game with handgun. That said I never took any of them defensively.
That has to be the dumbest rule I ever heard of! You can carry a revolver but not a pistol? Makes no sense at all!in Pa out highly intellegent leaders allow us to carry a semi (pistol)for concealed carry protection with a CCW permit while hunting or fishing but not lawful for hunting or "finishing off" an animal
so you have to carry a revolver for that.
or a sportsmans permit for revolver not concealed.
so ya carry the G22 on one side and the 686 on the other side lol. ?
guess it's so we can look cool?
In my Hunting day's S&W 657 41Mag. 210gr. JHPFor most of my life I have declined to carry any kind of sidearm when I go deer hunting, I considered it but always ultimately decided it was not worth the extra item to carry around. You know, got all those candy bars, and sammiches and mountain dew filling my pockets. I am thinking about it again and may change my mind, but I really dont have any handguns that are ideal for it. I have a couple full size 9mms and a compact Kahr cw45. No revolers, nothing in 10mm yet. My brother has used his carry guns in 9mm or 40 to finish off deer a few times over the years, and seems to think a handgun is worthwhile to have around.
Has anyone else seen a benefit to carrying a handgun? If so what? Or is it not needed?
If you did, between those cartridges what would you carry and what loads? Given my choices I am thinking of loading some hard cast 45s to plus p speeds.
welkum to Pa libeialismThat has to be the dumbest rule I ever heard of! You can carry a revolver but not a pistol? Makes no sense at all!
For most of my life I have declined to carry any kind of sidearm when I go deer hunting, I considered it but always ultimately decided it was not worth the extra item to carry around. You know, got all those candy bars, and sammiches and mountain dew filling my pockets. I am thinking about it again and may change my mind, but I really dont have any handguns that are ideal for it. I have a couple full size 9mms and a compact Kahr cw45. No revolers, nothing in 10mm yet. My brother has used his carry guns in 9mm or 40 to finish off deer a few times over the years, and seems to think a handgun is worthwhile to have around.
Has anyone else seen a benefit to carrying a handgun? If so what? Or is it not needed?
If you did, between those cartridges what would you carry and what loads? Given my choices I am thinking of loading some hard cast 45s to plus p speeds.
very accurate statement, picking a state or country for that matter certainly would be more helpful.The demographics are so diverse around the country that it may be prudent to define the mission prior to selecting the equipment needed.
For example, Mountain Elk hunters would require less personal protection whereas a local white tail hunter may feel safer staying at home.![]()
The OP didn't say for defense just against animals....It was who cares a sidearm.So then why are you even commenting on this thread? Nobody is discussing personal defense against people. But a rifle would make one hell of a club in close quarters. Lol.
I’m in New York State and carry a S&W m29 44 mag 6 shot revolver with federal 240 gr hollow points love the gun got a 6 pointer a few years backFor most of my life I have declined to carry any kind of sidearm when I go deer hunting, I considered it but always ultimately decided it was not worth the extra item to carry around. You know, got all those candy bars, and sammiches and mountain dew filling my pockets. I am thinking about it again and may change my mind, but I really dont have any handguns that are ideal for it. I have a couple full size 9mms and a compact Kahr cw45. No revolers, nothing in 10mm yet. My brother has used his carry guns in 9mm or 40 to finish off deer a few times over the years, and seems to think a handgun is worthwhile to have around.
Has anyone else seen a benefit to carrying a handgun? If so what? Or is it not needed?
If you did, between those cartridges what would you carry and what loads? Given my choices I am thinking of loading some hard cast 45s to plus p speeds.