I am used to using the ejector flow as a sign of pressure. What about a CRF action with the manual ejector?
Will I see brass flow into the slot as a pressure sign?
Will I see brass flow into the slot as a pressure sign?
How much growth am I looking for - is any bad?By the time you see ejector marks you are OVER pressure by 10,000 psi or more. A better measure is mic case head before and after.
The ship has sailed.No more than .0005" and new brass must be used.
Only if you use the same case which is what I do , my first firing for the day is the same case every time .Ackley quotes Vernon Speer as saying in 1956, when writing a load book, work up to brass change and then back off 6% powder charge.
I wanted to work up to long brass life. When I reloaded, I was looking for primer insertion being too easy. This threshold is inexact. That threshold could vary by more than a grain of powder. But if I measure the extractor groove all the way around with dial calipers before and after firing.... this threshold is repeatable down to a small fraction of a grain. The groove may bulge in one spot and have no effect on primer insertion, but it is a precursor.
I don't back off 6%. My variations in components and process are much smaller. My main concern is with temperature. I have not been characterizing temperature effects on powder, but using other's data.
By its vary nature looking at primer or brass variations is testing to the limits of those components which should never fail at normal SAAMI.It's been done to death. There are no pressure signs that work to stay within SAAMI limits. The standard fairly recent example is all the advanced hand loaders who published data on the Shooting Times Westerner based on pressure signs. That published data based on seeing pressure signs and backing off turned out to be almost invariably 10K over. There was a long and visible dispute between Bob Hagel and Ken Waters over the usefulness of case head measurement in their respective writings. Found in Pet Loads and in Bob Hagel's articles and books. Fun to read. The bottom line to repeat myself is that by the time pressure signs show up pressure is way too high by SAAMI standards. The only reliable indication is velocity of substantially the same components in very similar rifles.
And the trail to the top of Mt Everest does not meet county code for staircase construction.By its vary nature looking at primer or brass variations is testing to the limits of those components which should never fail at normal SAAMI.
Completely on point.By its vary nature looking at primer or brass variations is testing to the limits of those components which should never fail at normal SAAMI.
Years ago a calculation was done by someone at Lawrence Labs at Berkeley to estimate the pressure that would be required for hard bolt lift. Conservatively that pressure was estimated to be around 70kpsi.
In reality, looking at conventional pressure signs ignores the only real data that we have for pressure which is the published load data. Short of instrumenting and calibrating our rifle velocity is the only way to link our actual data to compare to published test data and infer peak pressure from that information. In doing so it’s also important to account for barrel length. This is especially important when comparing data from 24” test barrels to 20” and shorter barrels.
I've always had a problem with work up till you ruin several pieces of your brass, and over pressure your rifle a few times then go back and all will be fine. I have not found a way to sneak up on too much pressure but would love to.
I'll add GRT and to also consider learning to strain gage to this list.QuickLoad and a good chronograph.
There can be two reasons for this.I've always had a problem with work up till you ruin several pieces of your brass, and over pressure your rifle a few times then go back and all will be fine. I have not found a way to sneak up on too much pressure but would love to.