• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

Trijicon Tenmile?

Sandstorm, have you noticed any advantage or disadvantage using the F.AS.T. feature on mirage? I have read a couple different sites posts about the Schmidt Bender 12-50 model being best at reducing mirage. So, I either save and buy a SB scope, or take a chance on the SV ED........I know each one has it's + & - features, but my use is specific, so some are moot points...rsbhunter
 
Last edited:
Actually there really is no real great scope for mirage...its always an issue in the summer.
from what I hear the March High Master 10-60 x 56 is a great scope in those conditions, but its not
a cure all...just better for some eyeballs. I have not looked through it yet.
The big issue is you can never try them all in all conditions....and what works for you may or may not
work for me...
 
True.....I wish that there was a g way to get to look through a majority of mid to upper tier optics in a field/range type setting. I'm sure alot of guys lose $$$ on buying a scope online and then finding out it doesn't fit there needs or eyes....like stated, everyone's eyes sees differently, so you spend the money and hope...rsbhunter
 
True.....I wish that there was a g way to get to look through a majority of mid to upper tier optics in a field/range type setting. I'm sure alot of guys lose $$$ on buying a scope online and then finding out it doesn't fit there needs or eyes....like stated, everyone's eyes sees differently, so you spend the money and hope...rsbhunter
I couldn’t agree more. I looked at starting a scope rental service but too many hurdles to be profitable.
 
Last edited:
I think the scope mfg's should get a large trailer and tour the U.S. Different state every 2 weeks, what stops they can make within each state, and have the capability to sell for drop ship each different brand. Bet there would be a decent amount of sales, and some impulse sales!!!! rsbhunter
 
Like mentioned earlier the 34 mil tube makes a big difference with dialing at distance and keeping a clear picture.
Agreed. 34mm just makes pictures brighter and sharper. Downside is weight. And unfortunately the SVSSED is heavier than some boat anchors! LOL!
 
I'm lucky in the fact that our matches are informal, weight, etc doesn't matter....I realize that we have a plethora (love that word) of choices that boast better glass, innards, and features than ever, and there is almost no excuse to settle for less than what you want.....but, marketing being what it is, we have to base purchases of thousands of dollars on the printed word, or video review of a (usually) invested individual.... Wish there was a easy solution..... rsbhunter
 
Not just brighter picture with 34mm tube, but your ability to dial out to a 1000
and still keep it in a usable sweet spot....your not maxing out and loosing clarity and picture
quality. You can put alot of strees on the internals when you run out or near the top of your elevation.
Agreed. 34mm just makes pictures brighter and sharper.
 
Actually there really is no real great scope for mirage...its always an issue in the summer.
from what I hear the March High Master 10-60 x 56 is a great scope in those conditions, but its not
a cure all...just better for some eyeballs. I have not looked through it yet.
The big issue is you can never try them all in all conditions....and what works for you may or may not
work for me...

Seems that many folks think that expensive glass makes mirage disappear. Quite the opposite. It makes the mirage visible in all its glory. I had one scope setup and looking down my driveway with the paralax set at about 200 yards. My neighbor had never seen the atmosphere move like a river. He still talks about it. The detail in a good scope is incredible.
 
I have two of the 5-50. Absolutely in love. It’s been the best of the last three scopes I’ve used. Meaning it’s taken all the things I loved from my last three plus fixed some things from each I didn’t like. Incredible scope for $1700. I’ll post my full review later this week I’m hoping.
Greetings John. What reticles or reticle are you running on your 10Mile?
 
Has any one else noticed that FFP scopes "seem" to be selling used more often? I don't have any ffp scopes, as being older, the reticle at lower powers is a challenge. I was hoping to shoot the new Trijicon in a match last week, but family obligations prevented it. The next match will be January 1st (if it is held) so I will report back on my impressions of the Trijicon....but I'm not expecting to be disappointed... rsbhunter
 
Has any one else noticed that FFP scopes "seem" to be selling used more often? I don't have any ffp scopes, as being older, the reticle at lower powers is a challenge. I was hoping to shoot the new Trijicon in a match last week, but family obligations prevented it. The next match will be January 1st (if it is held) so I will report back on my impressions of the Trijicon....but I'm not expecting to be disappointed... rsbhunter
FFP is very desirable in other disciplines such as PRS, NRL, etc. Lots of recreational target shooters also prefer FFP. Guys like sub-tensions that remain constant through the power range. For instance, the Tenmile is accurate on 40x only. That may be too much power for a lot of shooting situations outside of F-Class, BR, etc.

For instance, I was shooting this past weekend with lots of mirage, lots of wind, and I was at 12x at 700 yards shooting steel. The target danced around from mirage and wind if I turned much higher. I was able to make first round hits on 3/4 IPSC steels in 20-25mph wind using wind holds utilizing my reticle.
 
Agreed. 34mm just makes pictures brighter and sharper. Downside is weight. And unfortunately the SVSSED is heavier than some boat anchors! LOL!
It seems to me that a 34mm tube has little to do with brightness and sharpness. That is a function of the lens. The larger tubes do allow for more strength and more adjustments. Just my 2cents worth
 
It seems to me that a 34mm tube has little to do with brightness and sharpness. That is a function of the lens. The larger tubes do allow for more strength and more adjustments. Just my 2cents worth
Perhaps. I’m not a scope or glass manufacturer so I’m just going off of what I’ve owned. Would have to have two scopes with everything identical except for the tube diameter. But I don’t know if anyone makes two scopes with the tubes being the only difference? I have a Trijicon Tenmile 4-24x50 and the Trijicon 4.5-30x56, they might have the same glass and coatings, not sure...But the bigger 4.5-30 Triji glass is definitely superior, especially in low light. Even if the glass and coatings were the same between the two scopes, it’s hard to say if the larger 34mm tube is helping or not because that scope also has a larger 56mm front objective which we know helps to make a brighter crisper image in all lighting conditions.

I have some other 30mm scopes that have amazing glass. Tho in low light they still don’t compare with my 34mm Trijicon. But again, different tubes and objectives and probably different glass since they are made by a different manufacturer.
 
One just popped up. Great deal if you want the mrad
 
One big advantage the big tubes sizes have, 34mm, 35mm, 40mm is travel. It’s nice to have more vertical than you need and not so nice to run out of vertical.
 

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
165,842
Messages
2,204,284
Members
79,157
Latest member
Bud1029
Back
Top