• This Forum is for adults 18 years of age or over. By continuing to use this Forum you are confirming that you are 18 or older. No content shall be viewed by any person under 18 in California.

What’s all the fuss about seating with an arbor press?

I actually use my 21 Century more for setting up the Redding dies and debugging issues than production seating. Once I have the Redding dies and process right I use the Redding exclusively. I find the arbor a useful and valuable tool though and am glad I have it.
Can you please explain what you mean by setting up the Redding dies using the arbor press? How do you go about that?
 
I am not an expert...

I bought the k&m with force pack with Wilson dies to prove to myself that my case prep is at least consistent. The force pack will tell you immediately if one round is way off compared to the others as far as seating force.

I was using forster micrometer seater die [very flimsy bullet seating stem] and my cbto would vary a lot [more than 0.01] with Wilson die they are all within 0.002 cbto.

Average round is much straighter. And those really crooked rounds don't happen anymore.

I've really enjoyed the switch over and i know my ammo is better.
 
Maybe I should have said "defining the process in using Redding Dies on a Redding T7" I have Wilson dies and the 21st Century but found I can produce as straight of ammo using the Redding dies once I have the right nose punch, expander dies, right tension from the bushing, right lube inside the necks etc. This I can detect using the 21st Century and force measurements. Right now, most of my ammo's runout is under .001" when produced on the T7. RCBS single stage no but the T7 will. Interestingly, I have quit neck turning and annealing as much as I used to since I went to no-turn neck diameters. Now my scores and test groups sizes haven't changed much if at all.
 
Thank you for all the responses guys, I appreciate your input. So the force required to seat the projectile is much more evident with the arbor press. Got it. But does that “feeling” or sensitivity translate into better groups in the end? Do you sort them according to “light, medium and heavy” feeling resistance?

Yes. It does.

Absolutely.
 
Get you an arkco machine press and keep the threaded dies. You can feel scratches in the neck seating bullets and feel the machining marks on turned necks when sizing. No arbor press is as good plus its just one piece of equipment thatll fit in a loading box drawer
 
Thank you for all the responses guys, I appreciate your input. So the force required to seat the projectile is much more evident with the arbor press. Got it. But does that “feeling” or sensitivity translate into better groups in the end? Do you sort them according to “light, medium and heavy” feeling resistance?

I use a 21st Century Hydro Press. It is portable and doesn't require mounting, which is an advantage in the hotel room while loading for the match. The PSI gauge lets me know if any rounds have some sort of inconsistency so I can set them aside as sighters. That's all I do in terms of sorting, set aside those that are outliers.

I can't directly show causation, but I am shooting smaller and smaller groups at 1000 yds.
 
I use a 21st Century Hydro Press. It is portable and doesn't require mounting, which is an advantage in the hotel room while loading for the match. The PSI gauge lets me know if any rounds have some sort of inconsistency so I can set them aside as sighters. That's all I do in terms of sorting, set aside those that are outliers.

I can't directly show causation, but I am shooting smaller and smaller groups at 1000 yds.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I also use the 21st century press and this is exactly what I do. I refuse to leave any points on the reloading bench when I'm the one making the ammo.
 
Wow, I just checked out the Arkco . I like how it uses both kinds of operations in one machine. And it has a built in click adjuster. Great, after I’ve already bout 8 of Whidden’s click lock rings for $52/apiece! Lol
 
Thank you for all the responses guys, I appreciate your input. So the force required to seat the projectile is much more evident with the arbor press. Got it. But does that “feeling” or sensitivity translate into better groups in the end? Do you sort them according to “light, medium and heavy” feeling resistance?
Yes, more or less like that. I add some more categories though: Light-Minus, Light, Light-Medium, Medium, Medium-Heavy, Heavy, and Heavy-Plus. "Light" is my normal "feel seating", because I have neck-turned to achieve that perceived feel pressure. Out of a 100-200 round batch, a few might reach "Medium", yet I've been surprised with a "Heavy" a couple of times!

My seating technique is to adjust the arbor press head so that the seating arm is at about 45 degrees downward when the seating ram rests atop the die with a bullet/case to be seated. I grasp the press arm so that the ball of the handle is at the back of my palm, with thumb and forefinger resting around the turning axle and elbow resting on the bench. Seating is by a slow downward wrist flex.

I think that it helps for long range elevation and peace of mind? You can say what you want about using "hand feel", but one thing that I'm assured of though, the statistical possibility of having a light seated cartridge followed next by a hard seated cartridge out of the loading box is eliminated (for good or for worse?).


 
Yes, more or less like that. I add some more categories though: Light-Minus, Light, Light-Medium, Medium, Medium-Heavy, Heavy, and Heavy-Plus. "Light" is my normal "feel seating", because I have neck-turned to achieve that perceived feel pressure. Out of a 100-200 round batch, a few might reach "Medium", yet I've been surprised with a "Heavy" a couple of times!

My seating technique is to adjust the arbor press head so that the seating arm is at about 45 degrees downward when the seating ram rests atop the die with a bullet/case to be seated. I grasp the press arm so that the ball of the handle is at the back of my palm, with thumb and forefinger resting around the turning axle and elbow resting on the bench. Seating is by a slow downward wrist flex.

I think that it helps for long range elevation and peace of mind? You can say what you want about using "hand feel", but one thing that I'm assured of though, the statistical possibility of having a light seated cartridge followed next by a hard seated cartridge out of the loading box is eliminated (for good or for worse?).

Well stated.
Lloyd
 
Yes, more or less like that. I add some more categories though: Light-Minus, Light, Light-Medium, Medium, Medium-Heavy, Heavy, and Heavy-Plus. "Light" is my normal "feel seating", because I have neck-turned to achieve that perceived feel pressure. Out of a 100-200 round batch, a few might reach "Medium", yet I've been surprised with a "Heavy" a couple of times!

My seating technique is to adjust the arbor press head so that the seating arm is at about 45 degrees downward when the seating ram rests atop the die with a bullet/case to be seated. I grasp the press arm so that the ball of the handle is at the back of my palm, with thumb and forefinger resting around the turning axle and elbow resting on the bench. Seating is by a slow downward wrist flex.

I think that it helps for long range elevation and peace of mind? You can say what you want about using "hand feel", but one thing that I'm assured of though, the statistical possibility of having a light seated cartridge followed next by a hard seated cartridge out of the loading box is eliminated (for good or for worse?).


A 40-50 PSI variance doesn't seem to show up at 1000 yds. That said, I set aside those with more than 20 PSI as sighters. Most of mine are within 10 if not 5 PSI.
 
I seat with wilson micrometer inline seater and k&m arbor press with force restoration pack and although my seating pressure is very consistant between 18 to 20ft pounds my loaded round runout is very dissapointing and varies between 2.5 thou all the way to 3 or 4 thousands
Verses 1 to 2 thousands when i seat with my 25 year old rockchucker press with a Redding comp seater
Could anyone who is seating .308 for ftr/ benchrest with The wilson micro seater and Arbor press share any info that helps reduce runout when seating also whats the prefered inside neck chamfer angle and tool that gives best results when using wilson and arbor press
For seating, Thanks.
I shoot 6 & 7 mm not 308 but of all the inside chamfer tools I have used the K&M has absolutely worked the best. I use a K&M arbor press with a force pack and I haven't had concentricity problems. One thing I do is seat slowly and watch the gauge when I feel the bullet move into the case I note the reading and stop with the bullet about half way in. I then turn the die 180 deg. and finish seating. According to an article I read on the daily bulletin this is supposed to improve concentricity. I can't prove it but like I say I have never had concentricity problems. Try checking the seater stem on your Wilson die. I normally take one bullet of the type I am using and lap the cone on the seater stem using lapping compound on the bullet.
I also have Redding competition seaters that I use in my rockchucker but I have generally gotten more consistent seating depths using the Wilson micrometer die.
 
I'm not shooting on the level of most of the people here but for 600 yard service rifle loads, I was using an arbor press and in-line dies (I guess because I had nothing better to do).

There was an article on Accurate Shooter by the US Army Marksmanship Unit that talked about bullet seating and loaded round run out. IIRC they achieved with standard dies in a standard press. run out equal to or less than in-line dies.

I tried the techniques from the article, which I had already been employing in varying degrees, and found I got both extraordinarily consistent seating depth and essentially no run out on a loaded round. I had never really measured before. I just assumed the arbor press and in line dies were better.

Of course seating force is a different issue.

edit to add; I was just searching for that article to add a link here but didn't find it and now the wife wants me to start doing things for her :) . And also, one thing that did make an improvement in my process was, I honed the neck on my full length resizing die so that it barely touches the neck on a fired case. It only sizes the neck down about .001 inch. I use it without the expander/deprimer rod. Next I both deprime and neck size in a Lee collet die.
 
Last edited:

Upgrades & Donations

This Forum's expenses are primarily paid by member contributions. You can upgrade your Forum membership in seconds. Gold and Silver members get unlimited FREE classifieds for one year. Gold members can upload custom avatars.


Click Upgrade Membership Button ABOVE to get Gold or Silver Status.

You can also donate any amount, large or small, with the button below. Include your Forum Name in the PayPal Notes field.


To DONATE by CHECK, or make a recurring donation, CLICK HERE to learn how.

Forum statistics

Threads
166,235
Messages
2,214,502
Members
79,485
Latest member
bhcapell
Back
Top