I get asked a lot about these two units so I decided to make a video showing all the differences good and bad for each. Enjoy...
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1- Because I canI don't understand why you guys like these fancy expensive trimming tools
The same guy is on sniper's hide telling people if you don't use a vibratory scale capable of 0.002 gr accuracy, you suck and can't load a low ES. I believe he's just a troll.1- Because I can
2- Speed. I can trim/ deburr 100 rounds in about 6 minutes or less with a Giruad
3- So you’ll have something to complain about
This thread made your prediction come true, John.I get asked a lot about these two units so I decided to make a video showing all the differences good and bad for each. Enjoy...
Boyd if you take a case 1.757 measured case head to case mouth and trim it on a Wilson or on a Giraud to 1.750 measured case head to case mouth they will both have the same .007 taken off the case mouth. I am not trying to put down either method. The Giraud and the Hendersons are both nice machines and certainly faster, but the case head or shoulder datum precision argument is falsePutting strips of paper aside, there is variation in shoulder bump, more on un-annealed brass. Those variations mean that if you index off of the case shoulder to trim the end of the neck, that the differences in shoulder to head will cause corresponding differences in case OAL. Whether any of this will show up on a target has yet to be determined.
Not if the shoulder to head dimensions are different for each case. (In the same lot of cases, sized with the same die and setting, shoulder to head dimension will vary, particularly if the cases are not owner annealed.) If you have two cases with identical trimmed OALs, and their shoulder to head measurements vary after sizing, and then you make their shoulder to case mouth dimensions by using a trimmer that locates the cut from the shoulder, the OALs will vary by the difference in shoulder to head dimension...but this can be deceiving because when they are fired they are knocked forward in the chamber, resulting in the case extension past the CHAMBER shoulder being uniform, which is the more important uniformity.Boyd if you take a case 1.757 measured case head to case mouth and trim it on a Wilson or on a Giraud to 1.750 measured case head to case mouth they will both have the same .007 taken off the case mouth. I am not trying to put down either method. The Giraud and the Hendersons are both nice machines and certainly faster, but the case head or shoulder datum precision argument is false
What’s the problem with annealing, getting a perfect bump when sizing, then trimming perfectly? I mean if I do a crappy job in any of the early steps it’s not gonna improve in later steps. All steps matter?Not if the shoulder to head dimensions are different for each case. (In the same lot of cases, sized with the same die and setting, shoulder to head dimension will vary, particularly if the cases are not owner annealed.) If you have two cases with identical trimmed OALs, and their shoulder to head measurements vary after sizing, and then you make their shoulder to case mouth dimensions by using a trimmer that locates the cut from the shoulder, the OALs will vary by the difference in shoulder to head dimension...but this can be deceiving because when they are fired they are knocked forward in the chamber, resulting in the case extension past the CHAMBER shoulder being uniform, which is the more important uniformity.
Agree. That assumption is the issue . . . at least it was for me and why I chose to leave my Wilson and go to a Giraud. I figured it was more important for me to get as consistent distance from shoulder datum to case mouth than the cases OAL. And to do that, I needed to index off the shoulder. As I've refined my annealing and sizing operation, I find I get such a small variance in case base to shoulder datum, that indexing off the case's base isn't going to make any difference on my cartridges performance. But I very much like the time savings of powered 3-way trimming over my tedious Wilson trimmer.The distance from the shoulder datum to the case mouth will be the same on each assuming both were sized correctly and had the same amount of springback.
They probably should figure out the bump issues. That’s like saying ya can’t measure powder to within a half grain but worried about seating depth. To me at least….If someone is worried about inconsistent shoulder bump impacting their trim, couldn't they just trim before sizing?
They probably should figure out the bump issues. That’s like saying ya can’t measure powder to within a half grain but worried about seating depth. To me at least….