jelenko
Gold $$ Contributor
I looked at what a stud is. What I found was a threaded rod shown with a nut at each end - another one showed a threaded rod screwed into a material on one end and a nut at the other end.Consider this like studs -vs- bolts.
That's what this is.
I believe you'll conclude that studs offer superior fastening, especially where the connection broadly challenges preload.
-With bolts, the first thread takes a third of the load, the first three threads take three-quarters of the load and the first six threads take essentially the whole load. Beyond the first six threads, the remaining threads are under essentially no load at all.
-With studs, the nut pulls ALL engaged threading into load -evenly.
Then there is direction of challenge (connection push/pull, tensile/shear).
Engine heads for example push apart from block, if not for fasteners holding their connection in preload.
This can be a lot of force, so studs, having greater loaded area, are preferred.
Racing engine heads are usually held down with studs (not bolts).
And I'll remind here that barrels also try to push apart from action.
I can think of nothing inferior with a stud connection, which is analogous to a barrel nut configuration.
Savage uses finer threading,, another plus.
Savages also shoot well,, another plus!
If that's what a stud is, how is it different than a barrel that is threaded into an action with a nut tightening it?
Thanks